Originally posted by curiouswa
BornOfSin, you might be right with the message you are receiving. Just found this prediction from another ATS thread today.
Year 2014 Little planet earth is slowly approaching and there is the possibility of colliding with the Earth, the existence of this small planet
affects issues arise concerning the sinking of mankind on earth.
Year 2015 Mid-November the world's average temperature likely to reach 59? Celsius, there are a lot of people die from the heat, thus the confusion of
the world getting worse.
Year 2016 Mid-April typhoon attacks, there was capital cities in China were damaged, some 1,000 people were killed. U.S. President George W. now Bush
going into hospital emergency room, his soul at death's door.
In 2018 On the issue of small planet to earth approach, the leaders of the world's governments gather mitigation meeting. Juce-lino in 2000 had to
predict, but it also tells the little planet's existence to NASA, on June 31, 2002 NASA officials are calling a small minor planet "2002NZT7". In 2019
Most likely solution would be to use the power of the results of scientific research, but if the earth collided with him, then it could result in 1/3
of the world population disappeared. Jucelino extrapolate small planet collided with the Earth by 60%. Sea area east Japan earthquake will happen
super large still more powerful than the earthquake that happened in the oceans of Sumatra, Indonesia.
Year 2025 Climatology experts rediscover small planet, it is very likely asking questions back to earth, the possibility of colliding at 80%.
Here is why I have issues with predictions like this. And I find it strange mainly because all it would take is just a little bit of research in order
to get the naming designations of celestial bodies correct.
But apparently no one, neither the person(s) making the predictions, nor those that propagate them through books or the internet, seem to bother with
any research at all in this area.
First, let's look at what you quoted:
on June 31, 2002 NASA officials are calling a small minor planet "2002NZT7"
The way Provisional Designation In Astronomy
works, is as follows:
An object is designated based upon the year and date that it was found, and then order in the case of multiple discoveries on the same dates.
There is a table in the link I provided that shows what the letters mean. I'll give you an example.
Say a minor planet was discovered on 22 Feb, 2013. It would be given the designation of:
If there had been something else discovered say on the 21st, then the designation would be:
If there were several objects discovered, then numbers would be used after the 2 letter designation. For example:
or 2013 DB17
The fact is, that the format is always the same: Year, 2 letters, followed by numbers.
The fact is, 2002NZT7 does not follow that format. There is a letter, "T" where it does not belong.
Okay, I'll give it the benefit of the doubt and say that it is a typo, and what they really meant was "2002 NZ 17"
Okay, that fits the format. However, there are 2 other problems. In your quote, it says that NASA used that name on June 31st.
Sorry, but NZ means Means between July 1st and 15th. Not June.
The only minor plant with a 2002 NZ designation is 2002 NZ 13, discovered on 4 July, 2002
List of minor planets
It's full name is 52014 (2002 NZ13). It has a orbital period of 3.8219 years (just under 4 years), and it has a MOID (minimum orbit intersection
distance) of 2.44 AUs, meaning it's not considered a threat. Only those objects tht have a MOID of less than 0.05 AUs are considered a possible threat
to our planet.
I'm not saying that they guy making this prediction is lying or making it up. What I am saying is I'm always dismayed at how people will take these
predictions at face value, believing what ever the person says without doing a single bit of research into the validity of the information, nor
asking these hard questions, like how did NASA announce a minor planet BEFORE it was even discovered???
edit on 26-3-2013 by
eriktheawful because: (no reason given)