posted on Mar, 21 2013 @ 10:12 AM
As the chemtrail theory has evolved, many different scenarios have been suggested. One thing stands out. They all claim that we have been sprayed
for some time. The amount of time seems to differ. Some say it started in 1997, others are more hard core and claim it must have started with Wilber
and Orvil. All that is fine, but when you look at the sources the chemtrail crowd uses to perpetuate their myth, all you need to do is read.
How is it remotely possible that a 2011 budget proposes the study of fitting aircraft to spray for geo-engineering purposes? They should have fleets
of these planes all over the world.
“Existing aircraft are evaluated based on cost of acquisition and operations. An in-depth new aircraft design study and cost analysis was
conducted to determine the cost of developing and operating a dedicated geoengineering airplane type. Similarly, an airship design study and cost
analysis was conducted. Finally a survey of non-aircraft systems was conducted to determine how their costs compare to aircraft and airships. Yearly
costs of 1M tonne geoengineering operations for all the systems examined are presented in Figure 2. Some systems are easily written off due to
extremely high costs. Rocket based systems are not cost competitive due to the large number of launches required and the impact of occasional rocket
failures on required fleet size. A system based on 16Σ” naval Mark 7 guns was analyzed and compared to previous work by the National Research
Council.4 This system requires large numbers of shots increasing projectile costs and driving yearly costs over $100B. Gun costs become more
competitive if the projectile payload fraction can be increased from about 10% for a standard shell to 50%. With this and a few improvements over the
1940-era Mark 7 gun yearly costs are still in the $20B range….The primary vehicles examined to lift particulate to stratospheric altitudes and
disperse them at a predetermined release rate are airplanes and airships; rockets and other non- aircraft methods such as guns and suspended pipes are
also surveyed.” –Aurora Flight Sciences: Geoengineering Final Report (p.5)
The rest of that source is the same old chemtrail bullet points that have been spread over the years.
So in conclusion, how is it possible that we need to do a study on cost to build a spray plane if they already have them? Is it possible that the
whole thing is just in the discussion phase? Is it even remotely possible that those white lines behind planes that look and act just like contrails
might just be contrails after all?
edit on 21-3-2013 by network dude because: chemtrails are fantasy.