Exposed: Secret Presidential Chemtrail Budget Uncovered – Congress Exceeds Billions To Spray Popul

page: 1
6
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join

posted on Mar, 21 2013 @ 09:33 AM
link   
Exposed: Secret Presidential Chemtrail Budget Uncovered – Congress Exceeds Billions To Spray Populace Like Roaches.


This is well worth looking into. The link is here [url=http://intellihub.com...].




posted on Mar, 21 2013 @ 09:40 AM
link   
reply to post by fireyaguns
 


link not working.
"THEY" must have gotten to it first.



posted on Mar, 21 2013 @ 09:43 AM
link   
reply to post by fireyaguns
 


But wouldn't they be spraying themselves, their children, their cousins, their friends and nieces and nephews and other people they potentially care about?

I've never understood this part... And what for?



posted on Mar, 21 2013 @ 09:45 AM
link   
reply to post by network dude
 

link works fine for me.
i've quote some of the text just for you, dude!

As an introduction to this article, we will first cover information to familiarize the uninformed readers as to the core facts and information so that a more complete understanding is possible, given this complex issue.



edit on 21-3-2013 by tinhattribunal because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 21 2013 @ 09:47 AM
link   
One hell of a misleading title that they put on that article. This whole thing is nothing but regurgitated information from the past, slapped together into a "new" article. All sense of credibility went out the window when I saw that they were sourcing their data from the Carnicom Institute.

"Hey, these are the chemicals they are spraying, and the amount over allowable ...", sure thing boss. How do you know this? Same data presented as before, still no information as to how they come to that conclusion.



posted on Mar, 21 2013 @ 09:49 AM
link   
reply to post by fireyaguns
 


If you copy the entire URL then click the link button and enter what you want the link to look like, then right click and paste the URL into the link, it will look like this for example.



posted on Mar, 21 2013 @ 09:52 AM
link   
reply to post by binkbonk
 

maybe they are immune to it.
maybe they have an agenda that we are unaware of.
maybe they have an antidote for it.

whatever the case may be, i don't consider ignorance (or ridicule, i know it's coming) to be a persuasive argument against geo-engineering by chemtrails.



posted on Mar, 21 2013 @ 09:55 AM
link   
Drum roll for sarcasm.....

Chemtrails do not exsist they are contrails....


Hi hat.



posted on Mar, 21 2013 @ 09:55 AM
link   

Originally posted by tinhattribunal
reply to post by binkbonk
 

maybe they are immune to it.
maybe they have an agenda that we are unaware of.
maybe they have an antidote for it.

whatever the case may be, i don't consider ignorance (or ridicule, i know it's coming) to be a persuasive argument against geo-engineering by chemtrails.


It just gets tiring to see the older information molded into a different form and shoved into a new article, only to be paraded around like something shockingly new. There is absolutely *NOTHING* new in this article.



posted on Mar, 21 2013 @ 09:56 AM
link   
Got the link to work.
But am I missing something? I don't see the budget numbers for a spraying operation. I see the same Chemtrail arguments with no proof, then I see this?


“Existing aircraft are evaluated based on cost of acquisition and operations. An in-depth new aircraft design study and cost analysis was conducted to determine the cost of developing and operating a dedicated geoengineering airplane type. Similarly, an airship design study and cost analysis was conducted. Finally a survey of non-aircraft systems was conducted to determine how their costs compare to aircraft and airships. Yearly costs of 1M tonne geoengineering operations for all the systems examined are presented in Figure 2. Some systems are easily written off due to extremely high costs. Rocket based systems are not cost competitive due to the large number of launches required and the impact of occasional rocket failures on required fleet size. A system based on 16Σ” naval Mark 7 guns was analyzed and compared to previous work by the National Research Council.4 This system requires large numbers of shots increasing projectile costs and driving yearly costs over $100B. Gun costs become more competitive if the projectile payload fraction can be increased from about 10% for a standard shell to 50%. With this and a few improvements over the 1940-era Mark 7 gun yearly costs are still in the $20B range….The primary vehicles examined to lift particulate to stratospheric altitudes and disperse them at a predetermined release rate are airplanes and airships; rockets and other non- aircraft methods such as guns and suspended pipes are also surveyed.” –Aurora Flight Sciences: Geoengineering Final Report (p.5)


No, why in the hell would we need to study how much it might cost to develop a spraying plane if they have been spraying us since 1997?

I think someone has got some splaining to do Lucy.



posted on Mar, 21 2013 @ 10:00 AM
link   
reply to post by binkbonk
 


I don't think they care at all. If they did the warning would be in advance and a trip out of the area is most likely the normal. Besides that, I doubt the trails are always only mass medication.



posted on Mar, 21 2013 @ 10:03 AM
link   
reply to post by tinhattribunal
 


Lotta maybes.



posted on Mar, 21 2013 @ 10:05 AM
link   
There is nothing wrong with hypothesizing and saying "maybe they are doing this" or "maybe they are doing it for this reason". The problem occurs when those people go from "maybe they are doing this" to "they ARE doing this". There's a big difference, and the line between the two often gets blurred by "chemtrail" believers. Without proof (beyond your ideas of what a trail might be), it just makes them look ignorant.
edit on 21-3-2013 by flyswatter because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 21 2013 @ 10:17 AM
link   
reply to post by tinhattribunal
 


I think the skies are being polluted to interfere with communication to GOD and they have been convinced that the benefits are worth the risk. They do this all for there sick master the ruler of the air.They have manipulated our minds with wireless frequencies and manipulated our eco system in the same manner all while weakening our connection with the only part of us that was ever any good. This kind of action is not cheap.
edit on 21-3-2013 by deadeyedick because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 21 2013 @ 10:28 AM
link   
This appears to be a rehash of the estimates for carrying out geoengineering if it were to be implemented plus all the usual stuff bolted on. That art historian even made it in there.



posted on Mar, 21 2013 @ 11:02 AM
link   
The naysayers won't believe that this is happening no matter how much evidence is given. I would be disappointing if the government wasn't testing this. The negative side effects seem to be overwhelming though. It is not the right approach though, lowering emissions worldwide is the right approach. Everyone using less fuels and buying less material things would be better. The solution will not be implemented though because of the negative effects on the fake economy which would be devastating. Sorry to spread doom and gloom saying that the problem is irreversible but that is the fact.



posted on Mar, 21 2013 @ 11:35 AM
link   

Originally posted by rickymouse
The naysayers won't believe that this is happening no matter how much evidence is given. I would be disappointing if the government wasn't testing this. The negative side effects seem to be overwhelming though. It is not the right approach though, lowering emissions worldwide is the right approach. Everyone using less fuels and buying less material things would be better. The solution will not be implemented though because of the negative effects on the fake economy which would be devastating. Sorry to spread doom and gloom saying that the problem is irreversible but that is the fact.


if someone grew a tiny pair of stones, collected enough money to rent a plane and test a contrail in the air, and cold show proof that it contained something other than ice crystals and aircraft exhaust, there would be no way to deny that evidence. You could expose the whole thing and demand answers.

Unfortunately, nobody on the chemtrails side is actually interested in the truth, they are much happier spreading doom porn.

Cost to film "What in the World are they Spraying" over $50,000.
Cost to sample a chemtrail - under $5000.

Do the math.



posted on Mar, 21 2013 @ 11:44 AM
link   
reply to post by deadeyedick
 


That, to me, is the cra..... Um well, that's probably the last reason. You do not send your prayers like radio signals. Even radio signals are not disturbed by the nothing or something "they" are spraying. God (if you believe in that kind of stuff) is in your being, you don't need to transmit through physical medium to communicate to a god that doesn't exist.



posted on Mar, 21 2013 @ 12:06 PM
link   
Great.

An article that's two years old and no indication of any "presidential budget."

edit on 3/21/2013 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 21 2013 @ 12:12 PM
link   
reply to post by Phage
 




budget

budgets are so like yesterday
A thing of the past only to be remembered as former constraints for the nwo





new topics
top topics
 
6
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join