It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Dasher
fallible it is to take a spiritual thing and force it into a literal understanding. is there really a sea where all the dead reside? can someone be "in" death? or are these things non-literal explainations of something beyond our understanding or simply hard to understand? thusly, how do we claim to understand something by reading only this one scripture? my prior arguements contained many verses to consider. they do not cancel out things such as "according to your own works," they divide the understanding further.
Gratuitous cut 'n' pastes snipped
Originally posted by defcon5
Dasher
Excellent post, I was already looking up the same quotes prior to reading your post. You saved me the trouble. I voted you up for that.
Lady V this relates to our last conversation, as to why not all Christians feel the need to preach endlessly to those that will not listen. If their Hearts are hardened to what you are saying, then this may be what God has chosen for them, or what God has chosen for them at this point in their life. What good does it do to show up at someone like that�s door every Sunday morning, you cannot change that persons heart, only God can.
Originally posted by zerotime
Let me throw my two cents on this one.
(Excellent post follows)
Originally posted by Majic
I'm not sure your post addresses my point. At least, I am not able to understand your position based on what you posted.
Does the Book of Revelation claim that all men will be judged by their works or not?
I request an answer in modern, non-King-James English, if that is at all possible, and "yes" or "no" would be ideal, with or without elaboration.
Originally posted by zerotime
Let me throw my two cents on this one.
God creates man and a morale doctrine that man should follow. God promises man that if he follows the doctrine that he will be rewarded and if he does not follow the doctrine that he will be punished. . . .
God makes it clear that anything against his morale doctrine is a sin, - evil. The definition of evil from the Bible is to rebel against God. If you knowingly commit evil acts you are rebelling against God.
Free will in itself does not lead to evil. Free will means making choices freely with full consent of the will and of the mind. The freedom to commit evil is always there but the freedom to never commit evil is also there. The original choice towards evil was simply a choice between oneself and God. Christians see evil similar to the actions of a bratty child � meaning God is in control, but �the child� wants to be in control so they rebel or lash out against God by creating evil.
That�s why they say God hates sin and not the sinner.
Originally posted by riley
Originally posted by bet555
I would have never understood that unless it was put just like that ... God is outside of the time spectrum ... So he sees things as they happen. That makes more sense to me then anything I have ever heard. Would that set up the fact that there are alot of spectrums of time ??? Different things happening on different spectrums or is that why people even question it. If god can see all the spectrums then why can't I kinda ideaology. hmm ... Maybe ... TTYL .. GREAT POST !!!! WHOEVER POSTED THAT AMAZING LITTLE SHORT AMAZING POST !!!!
Hmm. The thing about varying spectrums of time is that it would mean there would be no need for an actual begginning to all of creation and the universe wouldn't need a god to kickstart it.
Originally posted by zerotime
Dasher: It's good that you have such zeal for the subject, but I think you have a problem in one area. You have to learn to touch people�s hearts before bombarding Bible verses that are confusing to people and often pulled out of context. You seem to know your Bible verses very well, but I think you lack a real understanding for the meanings of the lines you quote. I don�t mean this as a flame to you and please don't take it personal. It is just something that I think you should think about to help with your future posts. If you want to move people to God then you have to talk to them in a down to earth voice that they can understand.
[edit on 4-11-2004 by zerotime]
Originally posted by Dasher
Originally posted by zerotime
Dasher: It's good that you have such zeal for the subject, but I think you have a problem in one area. You have to learn to touch people�s hearts before bombarding Bible verses that are confusing to people and often pulled out of context. You seem to know your Bible verses very well, but I think you lack a real understanding for the meanings of the lines you quote. I don�t mean this as a flame to you and please don't take it personal. It is just something that I think you should think about to help with your future posts. If you want to move people to God then you have to talk to them in a down to earth voice that they can understand.
[edit on 4-11-2004 by zerotime]
Gal 1:10 For do I now persuade men, or God? or do I seek to please men? for if I yet pleased men, I should not be the servant of Christ.
as i said. my beliefs are my beliefs. the only people my beliefs should be relevant to are those who believe in the bible. if you have a problem with the scriptures, then my views do not apply to you and that is completely fine. i am not speaking in order to argue people into agreeing with me. i argue in order to make the truth known. this shall be my departure unless there are reasonable questions asked. thanx for not flaming too hard.
daved
Originally posted by LadyV
What's this "free will" thing? How is it free will!? You are free to chose, but if you do, you get in trouble? How is that free will? Isn't that still a means of controlling what you think is free will?
free ( P )
adj. fre�er, fre�est
Not imprisoned or enslaved; being at liberty.
Not controlled by obligation or the will of another: felt free to go.
will ( P )
n.
The mental faculty by which one deliberately chooses or decides upon a course of action: championed freedom of will against a doctrine of predetermination.
The act of exercising the will.