posted on Mar, 20 2013 @ 06:22 PM
If he was anything but a Veteran then the liberals would be up in arms. A mother with cancer would have been a liberal crusade.
Most people support increasing VA funding. Liberals, however, do not.
For the liberal it is "end the war" and screw the vet. To them people engaged in patriotism are nothing more than baby killers who deserve to be spat
on. Yes, soldiers still get spat on.
Who, after all, comes out with all the vitriolic words about vets? Liberals.
Now that this vet is dying and he said something bad about Bush, the liberals get all excited because they want to mold it into another "blame Bush"
narrative, but ignore that for all their faux compassion they couldn't give a # about a vet who didn't get the care he needed.
This vet's anger is his to own and he is entitled to it. The liberals try to make it the point, ignoring the shoddy treatment he got.
Let's ask questions to all the liberals: would you be OK with slashing the other government social welfare programs and put it under the single
veteran welfare program? This vet ultimately has succumbed to his war injuries and did something to earn compensation. Can you say the same for the
recipients of government phones or school dinner programs?
I already know liberals will duck the question saying things like "cut defense".
Posted Via ATS Mobile: m.abovetopsecret.com