It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
If someone is forced to do something, then it's not from their heart, and it becomes fake. Forced religion is fake belief, then there are a bunch of liars in the movement, for their self interests like, not getting killed.
Originally posted by wildtimes
reply to post by logical7
Its sick to prey on ignorant people just because they desperately need money!!
Yes, it is.
But to impose sick, backward, destructive beliefs on unsuspecting people who didn't ask for it is arguably even WORSE!
It's one thing to screw people over for money - it's quite another to RUIN THEIR LIVES and POISON THEIR MINDS.
They are monsters. I'm sorry, on behalf of America, that this is one of our countries "exports."
Heaven forbid. Really.
Heaven?? *knock knock* ARE YOU PAYING ATTENTION??!
edit on 20-3-2013 by wildtimes because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by wildtimes
reply to post by LittleByLittle
not sure what to make of your post, Little.
Thanks for participating, though. Could you clarify a bit on how "they are paying attention"?
And who is "shining"? So that I might address your thoughts more pertinently...
EDIT:
Ah!!! Yeah, I agree. She gets it. Thanks for expounding on your thinking!
edit on 21-3-2013 by wildtimes because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by wildtimes
reply to post by heyitsok
Sorry, not seeing your point.
Could you please clarify?
I don't see ONE TINY THING about the religious-right zealots' exportation of their rabid "beliefs" and hatred that is noble or humane.
War, the organized conflict of nations for Hegelians, is only the visible outcome of the clash between ideas. As John Dewey, the Hegelian darling of the modern educational system, puts it:
"War is the most effective preacher of the vanity of all merely finite interests, it puts an end to that selfish egoism of the individual by which he would claim his life and his property as his own or as his family's."
(John Dewey, German Philosophy And Politics, p. 197)
Above all, the Hegelian doctrine is the divine right of States rather than the divine right of kings. The State for Hegel and Hegelians is God on earth:
"The march of God in history is the cause of the existence of states, their foundation is the power of Reason realizing itself as will. Every state, whatever it be, participates in the divine essence. The State is not the work of human art, only Reason could produce it."
(Philosophy Of Right)
For Hegel the individual is nothing, the individual has no rights, morality consists solely in following a leader. For the ambitious individual the rule is Senator Mansfield's maxim: "To get along you have to go along."
Compare this to the spirit and letter of the Constitution of the United States: "We the people" grant the state some powers and reserve all others to the people. Separation of church and state is built into the U.S. Constitution, a denial of Hegel's "the State is God on earth."
Yet, compare this legal requirement to the actions of The Order in the United States, The Group in England, the Illuminati in Germany, and the Politburo in Russia. For these elitists the State is supreme and a self-appointed elite running the State acts indeed as God on earth.
Originally posted by wildtimes
reply to post by nenothtu
I'd like to see that movie!
Have you perchance seen "The Mission", with Jeremy Irons and Robert deNiro?
Another excellent view of the Jesuits this time, in tribal south america.
My husband was in the Army National Guard as a Military Police Officer for years, and he was assigned duty in Panama, where they were trying to build schools. His job was to protect the people while this was done from the insurgent guerillas. He tells a story about how the 'natives' there could chop a tree down in one stroke with a machete - and they did so to help the soldiers get their Hummer unstuck at one point. But make no mistake, they could easily have hacked a man in half as well....
so it was a mixed signal of sorts to the "troops" there.
What you say is so true and important, neno. I think that simply going and helping, with NO ULTERIOR MOTIVE of preaching or "saving" souls, would be a better approach. With real charity, there is no "now you have to do this" - no expectation of anything 'in return' for the service or help. Using charity to push an agenda is what troubles me.
Originally posted by AfterInfinity
Perfect example of why I disapprove of Judaism. When you're dragging guilt and self-reprimand around like a rock, how do you ever expect to fly on the wings of forgiveness? It's actually quite genius:
Until you accept forgiveness from the outside to offset the guilt swelling within, you will forever be burdened with self-incrimination. As long as you condemn your own nature, you'll have no choice but to seek forgiveness and sell your soul for salvation. It's a perfect psychological trap.
That's also why I detest those brow-beating "altar calls". 99 % of the people who answer them are only doing it to be seen doing it, and to avoid the recriminations of "the faithful" if they refuse. Within a month, most of the time, they are back to living like hell all week long and expecting to get to heaven on a technicality because they go to church on Sundays.
"WHAT IN THE WORLD IS THE WORLD COUNCIL OF CHURCHES?" This
catchy question is also the title of a 1978 publication of
the WCC. It is an obvious attempt to answer some of the
vital questions and criticisms which are being raised by
those who love Jesus Christ and who value our cherished
American freedoms. However, far from answering such
questions and complaints, a discerning reader will discover
that the WCC actually confirms the charges of doctrinal
deviations and political radicalism.
We are concerned when we find so many true, Bible-believing
Christians who still hold membership in denominations which
are a part of the WCC (see complete listing of USA and
Canada member denominations on the last page). We also
believe that others, both within and without the church, who
believe in our free-enterprise system should be informed as
to how ecumenical church leaders are seeking to replace
capitalism with some form of socialism or communism under
the false label of the Kingdom of God.
THE POLITICAL RADICALISM OF THE WORLD COUNCIL OF CHURCHES isapparent. Just as in the case of doctrinal diversities, the
WCC boasts of its ability to hold together exact opposites
in the realm of politics. They say, "On other issues the
churches recognize strong differences of opinion and seek to
maintain a continuing dialogue among their own members.
These differences are not limited to trivial matters. For
example, THE WORLD COUNCIL OF CHURCHES INCLUDES PACIFIST MEMBER CHURCHES .... IT ALSO INCLUDES REVOLUTIONARIES. Both groups contribute insights to the WCC. They continue to try to influence each other. And the WCC INCLUDES BOTH WITHIN ITS FELLOWSHIP." There you have it in their own words.
"We're not going there to build homes, or give food.......
Let's start with the bad and ugly. The Brookings Institution issued a report last week that wasn't too kind to the Common Core State Standards, arguing that they will do nothing to help lagging student performance. Here's a sample: "The empirical evidence suggests that the Common Core will have little effect on American students' achievement. The nation will have to look elsewhere for ways to improve its schools."
Some lawmakers say the standards represent an intrusion of the federal government into a fundamental state and local prerogative. In Utah, some lawmakers want to make sure the state Legislature signs off on any federal directives related to the Common Core standards before they are implemented, to guard against "federal tentacles."
When you do people a good turn, without demanding a return on your investment, it frequently causes them to wonder what sort of a person would do that.
When they ask you, to find out, THERE is an opening.
Not "You like that new well? It's gonna cost you having to stay awake through a series of sermons you don't want to hear now".
If they never ask, well, that isn't your problem, because that's not why you did it to begin with.
As a matter of fact, requiring a trade will sometimes put your intended recipients off of the deal, and cause them to refuse the aid you had meant to give them.
You can't improve their lives if they refuse the assistance because they know you're just after something.
Also, were you aware that the Salvation Army is run by the infamous Rothschilds
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
It is too bad the Progressives are "overlooking" the activities of Sharia creeping ever so slowly into Western culture. You'd think it would mess up their secular program.
Originally posted by wildtimes
reply to post by ThirdEyeofHorus
Also, were you aware that the Salvation Army is run by the infamous Rothschilds
The Salvation Army is as far from actual "Christianity" as it can possibly be.
EDIT: ThirdEye, I'm amazed that you are participating here.
How rich are you, exactly?
I really have a lot of trouble following your way of thinking, but I know very well that it's hostile, angry, and defensive.
What is really up with that?
I'm not even sure why you decided to comment here.edit on 21-3-2013 by wildtimes because: (no reason given)