It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

A Stunning Defeat Has Been Handed to Senator Dianne Feinstein: Assault Weapons Ban Dropped !!!

page: 17
174
<< 14  15  16    18  19  20 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 21 2013 @ 10:14 AM
link   
reply to post by TruthxIsxInxThexMist
 





So, come on.... tell me why you need that assault rifle? I admit that it may look great but it has no use other than to kill or maim....

Yes, kill.
The weapons that Feinstein had on her bill, AK47's and AR15's are legal to hunt with in many states. They are the weapon of choice for many wild hog hunters.

Yes, hunters kill with rifles. It is a fact.



posted on Mar, 21 2013 @ 10:26 AM
link   

Originally posted by butcherguy
reply to post by TruthxIsxInxThexMist
 





So, come on.... tell me why you need that assault rifle? I admit that it may look great but it has no use other than to kill or maim....

Yes, kill.
The weapons that Feinstein had on her bill, AK47's and AR15's are legal to hunt with in many states. They are the weapon of choice for many wild hog hunters.

Yes, hunters kill with rifles. It is a fact.


You come on!

It is NONE OF YOUR BUSINESS why we buy our Colt rifles.

STOP sticking your nose in our gun cabinets! Get lost !!!

We don't need you looking over our shoulder when we purchase this rifle.




posted on Mar, 21 2013 @ 10:29 AM
link   
reply to post by TauCetixeta
 

I am a hunter, but I do not believe that the Second Amendment is in the Constitution for the purposes of hunting.

I support the 2nd fully.

I just get tired of hearing Feinstein and her ilk saying that we don't need 'assault rifles' for hunting. It is nothing but a lie!



posted on Mar, 21 2013 @ 10:42 AM
link   

Originally posted by butcherguy
reply to post by TauCetixeta
 

I am a hunter, but I do not believe that the Second Amendment is in the Constitution for the purposes of hunting.

I support the 2nd fully.

I just get tired of hearing Feinstein and her ilk saying that we don't need 'assault rifles' for hunting. It is nothing but a lie!


It is NONE of Feinsteins business what we do with our Colt rifles.

Thomas Jefferson

When the people fear the government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.



posted on Mar, 21 2013 @ 10:55 AM
link   
reply to post by TauCetixeta
 


Using those "people shot" as an argument for gun ban, as if there were no people shot by cops!

What a filthy reptilian lady!


A shame you've been having scum like this sitting in California for decades...



posted on Mar, 21 2013 @ 11:02 AM
link   

Originally posted by Echtelion
reply to post by TauCetixeta
 


Using those "people shot" as an argument for gun ban, as if there were no people shot by cops!

What a filthy reptilian lady!


A shame you've been having scum like this sitting in California for decades...


Progressivism: Central Planning Infrastructure

Intimidation,control,confiscation and re-writing the laws, one agency at a time.



posted on Mar, 21 2013 @ 11:24 AM
link   

Originally posted by Lichter daraus
reply to post by XGodofWar
 


Yeah maybe we do need to cut back on violence,but i don't understand why so many act like we are the lone violent nation in the world. I think the whole human race needs to back off on the violence a bit. Besides that i think most governments are more violent than the people. This is all just my humble opinion of course.



Socialists live in their strange world where they believe that grabbing their ankles in prison shower stalls will deter other inmates from being violent.

They want to sit back to let someone else protect them...without having the means to protect them.

It's kind of like giving them more welfare after the paper money runs out.

How, oh how, do we keep socialism alive in America if we listen to the advice of socialists??



posted on Mar, 21 2013 @ 11:27 AM
link   

Originally posted by butcherguy
reply to post by TauCetixeta
 

I am a hunter, but I do not believe that the Second Amendment is in the Constitution for the purposes of hunting.

I support the 2nd fully.

I just get tired of hearing Feinstein and her ilk saying that we don't need 'assault rifles' for hunting. It is nothing but a lie!



But....but...the Feinstein Wives say it's perfectly right to hunt human beings.

Maybe they mean with drones. I dun'no for sure what the Feinstein Wives are talking about when their lips are moving.

And don't forget that the Feinstein Wives have condemned military veterans as no longer being of sound mind enough to own a gun. It was okay when they carried a weapon into battle. But don't let them protect themselves at home.
edit on 21-3-2013 by coltcall because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 21 2013 @ 11:40 AM
link   
By the way...ever vigilant...

MILLER: U.N. threatens to override Second Amendment

Arms Trade Treaty puts American gun owners at peril


Read more: www.washingtontimes.com...
Follow us: @washtimes on Twitter



posted on Mar, 21 2013 @ 11:59 AM
link   
dont declare victory yet!

Obama has vowed To find the votes to pass a semi auto ban!

The dictator will get his way!

obamacare lacked the votes to pass but obama forced congress to votes yes!!



posted on Mar, 21 2013 @ 12:02 PM
link   

Originally posted by Dekard1138
dont declare victory yet!

Obama has vowed To find the votes to pass a semi auto ban!

The dictator will get his way!

obamacare lacked the votes to pass but obama forced congress to votes yes!!


The writing is on the wall.

President Clinton warned them. If they keep attacking the 2nd Amendment, they will

lose elections.



posted on Mar, 21 2013 @ 12:03 PM
link   
dont declare victory yet!

Obama has vowed To find the votes to pass a semi auto ban!

The dictator will get his way!

obamacare lacked the votes to pass but obama forced congress to votes yes!!



posted on Mar, 21 2013 @ 12:22 PM
link   

Originally posted by bknapple32
You all must be so happy! Now you can use those assault weapons to hunt.. err I mean, defend yourself against intruders. er I mean, defend yourself against the us government, oops no, that wont work either.

The Douche-asity of such comments is why you Lefty-Lunatics will continue to lose your grasp on this nation's real future. Please, submit here, your hobbies and interests, so that we may pick them apart, over-analyze and manipulate each one of them into a stereo-type, therefor insulting you to your core.

It can be done with anything, really. So, while you losers "make fun" of our interest in machines and mechanisms that are engineered well and represent an intricate history, we are waiting to hear from YOU, to show us how your interests, hobbies and time-spent is so much superior to ours.

Gehead. Wow us.

edit on 21-3-2013 by Eldensword because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 21 2013 @ 12:49 PM
link   

Originally posted by TruthxIsxInxThexMist
reply to post by TauCetixeta
 


So, you still believe assault rifles are needed for the ordinary Civilian to survive?

Some of these guys live in the City or Towns where Assault rifles aren't needed... are you going to allow those people to still have assault rifles?


You know...i'm getting really tired of seeing this stupid "Assault Rifle", and "Assault weapon" bulls**t every time i enter one of these threads....

an AR-15 is not an "assault rifle", and is not an "assault weapon"...it's just a rifle...albeit semi-automatic, it's still just a rifle, and no more dangerous than a "hunting rifle", which is, again, just another rifle...

i wish you all could just stop with the ignorant sensationalist bulls**t already..

and for the love of god, people, stop referring to box magazines as "clips"...more ignorant crap..

if you're going to have a conversation about something, or criticize, or debate it, at least use the right terms...anything less makes you look ignorant..



posted on Mar, 21 2013 @ 01:19 PM
link   
I hope the Feinstein Wives keep attacking us.

We're Gladiators. We need attackers to practice on for when the real problems arise.

The Feinstein Wives just aren't nearly as dangerous as the Stepford Wives.

But they'll do in a punch for shadow boxing to stay in shape.



posted on Mar, 21 2013 @ 01:20 PM
link   

Originally posted by Daedalus


and for the love of god, people, stop referring to box magazines as "clips"...more ignorant crap..





posted on Mar, 21 2013 @ 01:21 PM
link   
reply to post by Flux8
 


This is one reason I would never live in California. I have no use for the number of ultra liberal politicians there and their supporting puppets (not everyone in California is that way but it must be a majority to allow the politicians they do).

I have no use for most any politician, but those that want to get their nose in my business are likely to get it cut off.

Raist



posted on Mar, 21 2013 @ 02:32 PM
link   

Originally posted by Raist
reply to post by Flux8
 


This is one reason I would never live in California. I have no use for the number of ultra liberal politicians there and their supporting puppets (not everyone in California is that way but it must be a majority to allow the politicians they do).

I have no use for most any politician, but those that want to get their nose in my business are likely to get it cut off.

Raist


Let me be the first to explain and warn you. The problem in California is mob rule. If you look at the last election results, you'll see that San Fran, LA, and coastal is all blue....with the interesting exception of Orange County that is deep red along with the rest of the state. Basically, you have the city garbage and the wealthy elite keeping evil bitches like Feinstein, Boxer, and Pelosi in Congress.

Don't think it won't happen in your state eventually. Colorado has fallen and Texas is close to it. The good news is that with everything poised to collapse, I hope it will usher in a new wave of Libertarian/Conservative thought when it does. Wishful thinking I know.



posted on Mar, 21 2013 @ 02:40 PM
link   

Originally posted by bl4ke360

Originally posted by cornucopia
reply to post by bl4ke360
 


a computer and a gun are different, one allows me to communicate and the other was designed to kill life.


What they're "designed to do" isn't relevant, what is relevant is how the owner intends to use it. If I have a gun and don't kill anyone with it, why should it be taken away from me?


no,

only low consciousness species will create things that are intended to kill life.



posted on Mar, 21 2013 @ 02:45 PM
link   

Originally posted by TriForce

Originally posted by cornucopia

Originally posted by ManOfHart
What we do and say does make a difference.
Making a scene does work.
When they attacked our right we righted it.



lol..

the right is for militias, not for everyone to have a gun..

it's 2013, I think we can put down the guns and just take care of each other


or am I too ahead of the game?

lol

maybe I am, just planting seeds..

guns will not be needed in the near future


Militias were every citizen, farmer, baker or blacksmith that could stand.
The National Guard is NOT our militias, as some people try to claim.
We are our militia.


LOL

milities were so 1700's

you people are just looking to manipulate the piece of paper so you can have guns..

lol

talk about grasping at straws...

your bony fingers are all blue from holding your gun so tight!

LOL

what is the point?

protection?

from who?

LOL

like i said, EPIC waste of money and time...


you will NEVER need it.




top topics



 
174
<< 14  15  16    18  19  20 >>

log in

join