It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Druscilla
No means NO.
If a person is incapable of saying NO, that also equals NO.
In my more controversial militant far-fetched and impractical musings, I sometimes consider how nice it would be were someone to design an effective communicable airborne high-mortality plague keyed to target anyone and everyone with a Y chromosome.
Thoughts like this are of course wrong as there's nothing wrong with most men.
Still, it's abstractedly amusing to consider burning most to the field down to the soil to destroy all the weeds where an entirely new culture could be cultivated in its place.
It'd solve more problems worldwide than just sexual violence.
The entire geo-political theater and global political infrastructure as well as what issues are important and how they're addressed would change with an overwhelming majority population of Women.
It's a Science Fiction scenario that won't happen, but, a 80-90% female demographic would very definitely be quite different.
I don't think the boys left over would mind so much either; surrounded by girls, every boy would have a constant stream of variety to pursue and enjoy.
edit on 19-3-2013 by Druscilla because: (no reason given)
Self protection and what not. Ie. do not go out dressed like a hooker and not expect to get negative attention men, DO not go to a party and over indulge in alcohol because this could happen, etc. etc etc
Originally posted by LoverBoy
reply to post by HumAnnunaki
I'm not "making excuses". I already said it isn't the victim's fault by any means. At the same time, why put yourself in a bad situation that could be avoided. And no, rape and driving a car are 2 completely different things.
I think it's ridiculous people are oblivious and expect that everyone is going to act the same way as you and me. Their are sicko's everywhere, in all walks of life, so if you want to "protect people" teach some common since like not drinking so much as to where you are completely incapacitated. Their have been numerous articles by rapists, and one major thing many of them all have in common is an easy target. Why make yourself completely defenseless? Because you think life is all daisys and tulips? Obviously what we are doing to try and stop rape isn't working by any means.edit on 20-3-2013 by LoverBoy because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by DoubleDNH
Okay, question for you .. I am playing Devil's advocate here btw.. I obviously agree that rape is an atrocity and is never acceptable.
There was a recent news story of a man who went into a strip club and got drunk. He then proceeded to spend $10,000.00 on dancers, drinks, whatever... he left without paying and claimed he was too drunk and they (strip club, strippers, etc) took advantage of him and bilked him for all this money. He went to court and the judge essentially said, you got drunk, it was your responsibility to maintain control of yourself, therefore you are liable for the expenses.
Fast forward to the party this girl was at, she got drunk and more than one person who was at the party (again, from the coverage, this came out) that said this girl was drunk as all hell and was horny.. the guys were obviously drinking as well... why is it hat the court determined the guy who went to the strip club was drunk but liable for his actions when the girl was drunk and not liable for her actions at the party.
Please know I am not advocating that its of for anyone to do anything to anyone else when they are under the influence but does anyone else see a legal double standard here or am I just being a loon?
Thanks.
Originally posted by DoubleDNH
Does it make a difference? The argument used by the prosecution in the Steubenville case stated that the girl was completely incapacitated and did not have the where-with-all to say no or put up a defense..similar to the situation of the guy in the strip club.
Liable for your actions when drunk = liable for your actions when drunk according to the law...
Originally posted by kimish
reply to post by DoubleDNH
Because there is a double standard when it comes to gender. And she was a kid, not an adult.