It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by sirhumperdink
reply to post by ollncasino
....and that is unfortunate how?
i believe that was kind of the point
cant really provide any jobs with all that money tucked away...... sure as hell makes it easier to lend though
so whats more important to you a job or loan? (and i realize it isnt so black and white but in practice those are essentially going to be the results)
the article doesnt really provide much information but if this is done correctly it can be very effective and have very few long term problems (there will be short term problems as the wealthy refuse to invest or provide jobs and try to kick and scream to get their way but they ultimately have little choice....they will comply or be replaced by a new generation..... and i sincerely doubt that anyone who has invested that much of themselves into acquiring power will be willing to give it up)edit on 18-3-2013 by sirhumperdink because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by ollncasino
My objection to the confiscating of bank deposits is that it is a tax on the prudent to bail out spendthrifts.
So, if the US was to go the Cyprus route, and begin impairing balance sheet liabilities to remark assets, there would be precious little space (with just $4.3 trillion in total other funding liabilities), before one would need to start eating into the deposit base, should Congress decide to implement a very "fair and just" financial asset tax in the US next. Will Congress do this? Obviously, nobody can answer that question now. However, it was "absolutely certain" as recently as 48 hours ago that Cyprus too would see no depositor "bail in" either. Then things changed rapidly. What is known, is that according to the same BCG chart we showed last night, the necessary debt-reduction needed in the US to reach a sustainable debt level, was over $8.2 trillion using debt numbers as of 2009...
Originally posted by Agit8dChop
In theory right, wouldnt much of the debt owed by nations be owed TO the rich?
So, effectively, if you take a 15% tax bite out of the rich, to pay off the debt you owe the rich arent the rich still rich?
edit on 18-3-2013 by Agit8dChop because: (no reason given)
When Greek government debt was written down as part of a deal in 2011, that wiped out a lot of the remaining value of Greek debt. Popular Bank lost 76 percent of the value of their Greek bond holdings in the deal.
How did the banks deal with losing all that money?
They didn’t, and, fearing the worst, the Cypriot government nationalized Popular Bank. The Bank of Cyprus requested assistance too.
Originally posted by Senduko
I'm having so much fun right now EU member myself,
I remember when news spread about Greece, and how people where saying well they got what they deserved those lazy people who don't deserve our money yada yada ya...
I remember watching the news and seeing this old Greek lady in tears and she screamed to the reported "All of you people from Europe, watch us, watch Greece we have become the guinea pigs of Europe"
Originally posted by Agit8dChop
In theory right, wouldnt much of the debt owed by nations be owed TO the rich?
So, effectively, if you take a 15% tax bite out of the rich, to pay off the debt you owe the rich arent the rich still rich?
edit on 18-3-2013 by Agit8dChop because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Lostmymarbles
This could be a 2 step disaster. If the "rich" (not sure how much would be considered rich) pull out all their money before the tax hits then it would cause the banks to almost fail in which point they would need a bail out.
Originally posted by sirhumperdink
reply to post by ollncasino
[...]
this is why we have inflation ....more money needs to be printed and at a lower value in order to decrease the value of assets that have been horded and allow for a percentage of that value to be reintroduced into circulation (this usually doesnt work out very well but thats another subject entirely)