Recycled water to be on tap after plan approved by Barnett Government, page 1


Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 4 times
Topic started on 18-3-2013 @ 12:05 AM by omega man

Recycled water to be on tap after plan approved by Barnett Government


www.theau stralian.com.au
HOUSEHOLDS across Perth will soon be drinking recycled waste water.

WA will be the first state to drink recycled water when up to 35 billion litres of treated sewage is pumped into our underground supply each year under a plan to be ticked off by the Barnett Government.

The Sunday Times can reveal the Water Corporation will recommend within weeks that treated waste from showers, washing machines and toilets be re-used to drought-proof the state.

Treated sewage has been quietly injected into Perth's aquifers during a trial that ended in December. WaterCorp will advise the Government t
(visit the link for the full news article)


Related News Links:
www.perthnow.com.au
www.theaustral ian.com.au
www.readersdigest.com.au


reply posted on 18-3-2013 @ 12:11 AM by Wrabbit2000
reply to post by omega man


Only down under can you find yourself having to drink what comes from ..well... down under.

I hope you guys do something about that. I believe they call it grey water up here and limit it's use strictly to landscape irrigation and such.

On that happy, yummy note... I'm hopping off to bed. Yikes..


reply posted on 18-3-2013 @ 12:15 AM by retirednature
reply to post by omega man



I don't get it.

People waste fresh water all the time, knowing that it is a limited resource. We take long showers, flush toilets, yada yada yada. Well, what do people expect when measures then have to be taken that allow for individuals to maintain consumption rates?

Go start washing in the river, pooping behind a tree next to a bush if you're really that concerned.

I guess my point is. Get used to it... recycled water will probably become the norm across much of the world. As techniques get better, so will the water. It's kinda scary to think that we're drinking waste water, but if done correctly... I've got no problem with it. Or maybe this is just the Illuminati gearing up for population control (conspiracy cheap shot lol)


reply posted on 18-3-2013 @ 12:21 AM by Aloysius the Gaul
reply to post by retirednature



Yep - typical small minded ATS attitude from the OP equating recycling "grey water" to "jackboots".

AS if the environment isn't already under enough strain - and remember Perth is a notoriously dry part of Australia - this muppet wants to screw up the natural water supplies for hundreds of miles around rather than practicing any form of sustainability or conservatoin.

Just wait until he realises that ....drum roll....Agenda 21 is about sustainability too...that should get the NWO nuts out in force....


reply posted on 18-3-2013 @ 12:21 AM by omega man
Originally posted by retirednature
reply to
post by omega man



I don't get it.

People waste fresh water all the time, knowing that it is a limited resource. We take long showers, flush toilets, yada yada yada. Well, what do people expect when measures then have to be taken that allow for individuals to maintain consumption rates?

Go start washing in the river, pooping behind a tree next to a bush if you're really that concerned.

I guess my point is. Get used to it... recycled water will probably become the norm across much of the world. As techniques get better, so will the water. It's kinda scary to think that we're drinking waste water, but if done correctly... I've got no problem with it. Or maybe this is just the Illuminati gearing up for population control (conspiracy cheap shot lol)
My point being, that under the Australian Constitution all matters must be put to a public referendum, like the imposed Carbon Tax, Julia Gillard imposed after saying she wouldn't. How do we know Micro-Organisms of deadly bacteria are not going to be present? West Australians should have a vote on whether it should be mandatory? Ironically Barnett didn't mention this before the recent (March 9 2013) WA state election. To me it sounds more like the implementation of AGENDA 21. www.jeremiahproject.com...


reply posted on 18-3-2013 @ 12:32 AM by BO XIAN
reply to post by omega man



Gives new meaning to . . .

"BOTTOMS UP!"

or maybe

"WHAT GOES AROUND, COMES AROUND."

or maybe

"YOU REAP WHAT YOU SOW."

or maybe

"Ask not what a good flush can do for you;
ask what your flush can do for your city."


or maybe

"L'eau de toilet by the glass."

or maybe

"GET YOUR MASSAGEd WATER HERE."

I figured this topic NEEDED a bit of bad puns comic relief.


reply posted on 18-3-2013 @ 12:34 AM by BO XIAN
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
reply to
post by omega man


Only down under can you find yourself having to drink what comes from ..well... down under.

I hope you guys do something about that. I believe they call it grey water up here and limit it's use strictly to landscape irrigation and such.

On that happy, yummy note... I'm hopping off to bed. Yikes..


Actually, the high desert state of New Mexico . . . is familiar with drinking such water.

And, My blood dad helped construct a new water treatment facility in Phoenix decades ago. Even then, he noted that they could put sewer water through the plant and it would come out pure. They didn't, at that time, do that but the cleansing process for the normal water sources was that good.



reply posted on 18-3-2013 @ 12:50 AM by occrest

People waste fresh water all the time, knowing that it is a limited resource
reply to
post by retirednature


I never really understood this statement, tho i hear it all the time. How can we waste water when we live in a closed system?






On topic tho, get a home water filtration system. Chlorine may kill all the bacteria, but you may still have particulates which you would not wish to consume.


reply posted on 18-3-2013 @ 01:13 AM by retirednature
reply to post by occrest



Sure, it's a closed system. But it's about the volumes that are being consumed and the transfer rates between stages outlined in your image.



Americans use large quantities of water inside their homes. The average family of four can use 400 gallons of water every day, and, on average, approximately 70 percent of that water is used indoors.


7 billion, divided by 4, multiply by 400 right? Might as well call it 100 gallons a person/day.

www.epa.gov...

If the world would consume at this rate, that's 700,000,000,000 gallons of water a day! You take this away from all the lakes or fresh water sources at this rate, it will never be returned in a fashion that respects any local ecology.

It's like saying, "A" gives volume of 10v to "B" and then "B" gives it to "C", and "C" then returns it back to "A", creating your closed model. Then introducing party "D" who wants any value, lets call it 1v, but this time, "D" has to be responsible, because that "1v" can't just be given to "A". Whatever "D" has, changes the cycles, and doesn't go right back into the system. Which is a terrible thing, because that 1v is held out, while at the same time "D" takes another "1v" as time progresses, now removing 2v from the system.

It's obviously not that cut and dry, but I think that should make sense lol.


So it's either, start recycling water(achievable), lower consumption rates(achievable, but not preferred), or say "screw it" and consume resulting in the destruction of the ecology of Earth.

Sure, there's a lot of water, but there's a lot of people and a lot of waste. All of this waste can't just be tossed back into the system, unless you disregard nature. At these volumes, the disregard of nature could result in our own demise in the end. Simply put I guess.


reply posted on 18-3-2013 @ 02:03 AM by Chadwickus
reply to post by omega man



Whilst I agree that this probably should have been mentioned before the election, I disagree with the rest of your stance. Which mirrors the stance of the Sunday Times as well, they clearly have an agenda, with a front page headline of POTTY PERTH being used, it sets a negative mindset.

Careful that you don't get caught in their rhetoric.


reply posted on 18-3-2013 @ 03:32 AM by Panic2k11
reply to post by omega man




How do we know Micro-Organisms of deadly bacteria are not going to be present?


The same way you know in other types of water plants, in that particular case you would probably even get better quality water since the precess starts with the presumption that the source water would kill everyone without proper treatment...
.
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



Norway To Open Century Old Package
  Posted 19 days ago with 127 member flags
Blame The Real Bad Guys - The Powers Behind Super Powers
  Posted 18 days ago with 65 member flags
19 Yr Old Hostage Gunned Down By Police While Escaping Captor
  Posted 8 days ago with 53 member flags
DHS Source: “It’s going hot”
  Posted 14 days ago with 49 member flags
Police Shoot Another 911 Caller In Her Own Backyard
  Posted 19 days ago with 46 member flags
The Oatmeal\'s Tesla Fundraiser Pushes Past $1.1M
  Posted 15 days ago with 44 member flags