It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by richard42smith
reply to post by Bluesma
It's a fascinating subject. Whether or not there is a collective unconscious is, in itself, very interesting to consider. Do all the human brains on the planet participate in some sort of collective activity? Have you heard of Rupert Seldrake's Morphogenetic Field Theory? I have no idea if it's right, but it is testable. Likewise, I feel we should pay more scientific attention to phenomena such as channelling/summoning - even if they are nothing more than a mental malfunction of some kind, that in itself would be interesting.
Thats your issue not mine i only provided simple evidence to show the possibility, and your only and continued argument is that it is not "science".
No, i didnt because i dont really care if we share the same perspective, and im not going to spoonfeed you anything, if you really want the info you know where to look.
the only reason i keep responding to your posts
For starters here is some info you are either missing or ignoring... Local Interstellar Cloud
The Solar System is thought to have entered the Local Interstellar Cloud at some time between 44,000 and 150,000 years ago and is expected to remain within it for another 10,000 to 20,000 years.
Diagram of the local clouds of matter that Earth's solar system is moving through,
Originally posted by this_is_who_we_are
reply to post by Bedlam
We are currently moving through it according to the Nasa link that I provided in my post. Go back. take a look.
Originally posted by stereologist
reply to post by TauCetixeta
The Sun's magnetic poles flip every 11 years on average. The Earth's magnetic field has not flipped in 700,000 years. The two are not linked. The Sun's magnetic field changes quickly, but the flip happens over an extended time, not a day.
Originally posted by stereologist
reply to post by RadicalRebel
Thats your issue not mine i only provided simple evidence to show the possibility, and your only and continued argument is that it is not "science".
That's right. My argument is that you challenged me with irrelevant evidence. Later you had the gall to claimit was science. It is not.
No, i didnt because i dont really care if we share the same perspective, and im not going to spoonfeed you anything, if you really want the info you know where to look.
More whiny excuses. You're wrong.
the only reason i keep responding to your posts
The real reason is that you can't admit being wrong. If you were actually interested in this other thread you'd have gotten right to the point.
Yeah...you got me, im wrong.
Now can we move on with the actualthread topic?
The word is that they will be this time.
We won't have to wait long. The latest SDO photos show magnetic lines jumping out of the suns
south pole right now. The north pole is next.
So it would seem to me after giving many opportunitiee to stay on topic you only wish to argue and derail the thread from its topic.
Ill not be responding to your posts any longer, since you dont understand me and only wish to argue to the last word please have at it just try not to intentionally misquote me again.
While we have been in it for a long time there is also an understanding that this "energy cloud" is not of a homogenious state, that its content and density varies throughout and science is showing that the region we are entering currently is increasing its effects on the heliospere and the solar system as a whole.
Originally posted by stereologist
reply to post by TauCetixeta
The word is that they will be this time.
We won't have to wait long. The latest SDO photos show magnetic lines jumping out of the suns
south pole right now. The north pole is next.
Magnetic lines always appear out of the Sun, the Earth, and all objects with magnetic fields. The complicated nature of the Sun's field is due to the equator of the Sun moving faster than the poles.
The Earth's field changes very slowly compared to the Sun's. The Earth's field is due to current in the liquid part of the core. The two are obviously separated as the Sun has reversed polarity some 60,000 times since the last time the Earth reversed its polarity.
BTW, i'm not so sure about that 60,000 number but it really doesn't matter.
Most reversals are estimated to take between 1,000 and 10,000 years.
Originally posted by RadicalRebel
You really need to go read the links and information provided by many people in this thread, your arguments are contrary to what is already known and published by "real" scientists, seriously....read more talk less....
Obviously the info isnt pertinant to your argument but if you were to actually spend some time reading the research information you would see its relevance clearly.
This has already been covered and links providing the information are given, your not even reading this thread...
Originally posted by tetra50
local "fluff?" I guess I should be reading this whole thread. If only the words "local fluff," appealed to my sciency side, no matter how stupid I am. What are the two of you going on about.
Does "local fluff," have anything to do with the concept of aether?
Originally posted by TauCetixeta
The word is that they will be this time.
We won't have to wait long. The latest SDO photos show magnetic lines jumping out of the suns
south pole right now. The north pole is next.
Originally posted by Bedlam
What's going on is that the OP posted some pseudo-science reference to a fictitious 'energy cloud' that's supposed to induce some sort of 'ascension', it's a throwback to 2012 fever. A number of posters are attempting to rationalize the 'energy cloud' as being co-identical to gas clouds that the system passes through, and one is also trying to ring in LaViolette's cosmic ray burst conjectures as ALSO being the same, while simultaneously arguing that it's the local cloud.
Not only are gas clouds NOT 'energy cloud of galactic wave' as described by 'Russian scientist' in the top of the thread, the cites being used clearly state that they are postulating effects that MIGHT be seen if we were to POSSIBLY hit some very dense gas cloud at some future time.
But hey, why waste a good chicken little article by reading it?
reply to post by tetra50
.. this poster didn't just answer your question (which seemed pretty clear to me) but took it as an opportunity to slam everyone else in this thread and twist their words, intents, motives, and thoughts!
His "chicken little" comment, at least, explains why such actions feel necessary to him- he finds this stuff scary.
I'll speak for myself- In examining other theories and concepts which might be "similar to" the elements described in that video, my intent is not to say "This is the "energy cloud"! It is going to do exactly what that video said!"
My experience in life has shown me that sometimes a correct intuition can become wrapped in nonsense
The "fluff" is written about and linked to as a possible reference. Whether or not it could trigger any sort of DNA changes hasn't been explored much because this poster has been very good at posing an obstacle to that. But at first glance it doesn't look like a reasonable candidate.
Originally posted by Bedlam
I'll speak for myself- In examining other theories and concepts which might be "similar to" the elements described in that video, my intent is not to say "This is the "energy cloud"! It is going to do exactly what that video said!"
You didn't above...
Think that might be why I "pose an obstacle to that"? And I'm speaking for sense, and factual evidence, but not 'everyone'.