It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by jashn20002000
reply to post by TauCetixeta
Its good to see that someone besides rand Paul is actually bring up the obvious. That the politicians in these positions of enforcing unjust laws and bills never answer the real questions when asked. He had to goat it out of her and when he finally did she just resorted to lying. If you believe the these laws should not be held against certain areas or otherwise stated as certain books then why my good lady are you enforcing this ridiculous gun law that gos against the very constitutional rights that not only founded this country but the same constitutional rights that you "claim" to have a great respect for?
Thank God Senator Ted Cruz is there to remind everyone about the 1st, 2nd & 4th
Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
Originally posted by jimmyx
it's simple...ted cruz want no band on any firearm, no matter how powerful or deadly. feinstein wants military style weapons banned from the general public. i suggest that every neighbor around ted cruz's home be armed with bushmaster assault rifles, him, his wife and kids would obviously feel perfectly safe. also, every one of the people that have communicated with cruz, that may not like him or even hate him, also be armed with bushmaster assault rifles, all mentally ill people should be armed with bushmaster assault rifes. all parolees from prison should be armed with assault rifles......absolute IS ABSOLUTE.
"Lets just shred the U.S. Constitution and make the U.S. Supreme Court clean up our mess!"
Originally posted by benrl
I love how she dodges the question and goes for an emotional retort rather than address the real issue asked.
Emotions don't override the rule of law, the comparison of banned books and the first amendment to guns is spot on, you can't pick and chose what gets protected by the constitution randomly.
Originally posted by jimmyx
wrong, wrong, wrong...books with child porn are banned, which is totally against the 1st amendment...
Originally posted by TauCetixeta
reply to post by seabag
Yes, Senator Ted Cruz smoked out Eric Holder also!
He eventually received a "No." from Holder but it wasn't easy.
Clearly, there is a new sheriff in town and his name is Senator Ted Cruz.
Originally posted by seabag
reply to post by TauCetixeta
I think we may have found the antidote for the 2016 democrat ticket….
Rand/Cruz - Cruz/Rand or possibly Cruz/Rubio – Rubio/Cruz??
Hey, nobody knew Obama before the ‘anointed one’ took his throne. Cruz, Paul and Rubio are all making big waves and all have bigger national name recognition than Obama did in 2007.
Originally posted by seabag
reply to post by TauCetixeta
I think we may have found the antidote for the 2016 democrat ticket….
Rand/Cruz - Cruz/Rand or possibly Cruz/Rubio – Rubio/Cruz??
Hey, nobody knew Obama before the ‘anointed one’ took his throne. Cruz, Paul and Rubio are all making big waves and all have bigger national name recognition than Obama did in 2007.
Originally posted by TauCetixeta
Thank God Senator Ted Cruz is there to remind everyone about the 1st, 2nd & 4th
Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
I hope he lectures the progressives every week!
Looking offended didn't work for Senator Feinstein. Nice try. Answer the question!
You see, this is what happens when the Tea Party arrives in Washington D.C.
Why it interests me???
The 2nd Amendment sounds kinda important to many Americans. I am one of them.
Description of the content???
Senator Ted Cruz asks a simple question to Senator Dianne Feinstein.
Should we go after the 1st Amendment and the 4th Amendment the same way you
are going after the 2nd Amendment. That is what the video says.
Originally posted by thisguyrighthere
Originally posted by jimmyx
wrong, wrong, wrong...books with child porn are banned, which is totally against the 1st amendment...
Tell that to Jock Sturges.
Originally posted by jimmyx
Originally posted by benrl
I love how she dodges the question and goes for an emotional retort rather than address the real issue asked.
Emotions don't override the rule of law, the comparison of banned books and the first amendment to guns is spot on, you can't pick and chose what gets protected by the constitution randomly.
wrong, wrong, wrong...books with child porn are banned, which is totally against the 1st amendment...picking and choosing what gets protected by the constitution happens all the time...that's why ted cruz didn't get an answer, because it was such a ignorant question. and, for those of you on the first 2 pages of this thread in support of this nutball from texas, to not even be able to think this through using elementary reasoning skills, is beyond comprehension.
Originally posted by jimmyx
Originally posted by benrl
I love how she dodges the question and goes for an emotional retort rather than address the real issue asked.
Emotions don't override the rule of law, the comparison of banned books and the first amendment to guns is spot on, you can't pick and chose what gets protected by the constitution randomly.
wrong, wrong, wrong...books with child porn are banned, which is totally against the 1st amendment...picking and choosing what gets protected by the constitution happens all the time...that's why ted cruz didn't get an answer, because it was such a ignorant question. and, for those of you on the first 2 pages of this thread in support of this nutball from texas, to not even be able to think this through using elementary reasoning skills, is beyond comprehension.