It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Trillium
Originally posted by abeverage
Ya thing are heating up
here JPL info on it
ssd.jpl.nasa.gov...
Why? It is not an Earth Crosser and it is actually not a crosser on any of the inner planets...why worry?
Thrust me it not about the one they tell us I worry about
It the combination of all the other one why so many that 4 or 5 now for this year
Interesting time that for sure.
Originally posted by Trillium
reply to post by abeverage
Ya remember Heaven's Gate and Hale-Bopp
I'am 58 been looking up for quite a few year.
To me it just a passing interese. that I do every two week off work a month
Originally posted by thepolish1
I've said this in numerous threads, We do have a few comets in sight for this year. Comets tend to pick up bodies in space due their gravity. Comet Lemmon has already passed, Panstarrs you can see now. And supposedly Ison has at least 7 or 8 companions, that they can see. It's odd that those threads got 404'd. Next week an asteroid hits the Atlantic huh. Isn't that on the 20th or 21st???
Originally posted by thepolish1
Comets tend to pick up bodies in space due their gravity.
Originally posted by thepolish1
And supposedly Ison has at least 7 or 8 companions, that they can see.
Originally posted by thepolish1
reply to post by wildespace
Ok, I stand corrected, I had also stated that Ison "supposedly" had companions, and "I don't know" That is far from trying to make my comment seem like fact. But thank you wildespace.
Originally posted by ngchunter
Originally posted by wildespace
I see a very bright pixel following the comet (to the left and slightly lower), dimming out of view for a couple of seconds and then appearing again but fainter. If it's just a dodgy pixel on the sensor, it would be strange that it follows the comet. There's also a smaller (fainter) pixel to the upper left of the bright one, following in the same direction.
I'll ask around on astronomy goups.
The hot pixel will follow the motion of the telescope, which in this case was probably tracking the comet over time (either autoguiding on it or through external software). When he then went and made the gif animation he registered the images relative to the stars, not to the comet, thus the hot pixels follow the comet. I sent Mr. Lawrence a tweet and asked him to confirm this, will post his reply if he replies; he's fairly well-known in the UK and I'm sure quite busy.edit on 17-1-2013 by ngchunter because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by ngchunter
Incidentally, the photographer of OP's image, Pete Lawrence confirmed it was noise in the image (ie, hot pixels), and that the tracking drift of his telescope was coincidentally in the same direction as the comet over time.
"Pete Lawrence @Avertedvision
Originally posted by Insomniac
reply to post by mclinking
In that thread is a detailed explanation by a highly experienced astrophotographer confirming that the anomaly is in fact hot pixels followed by confirmation from the actual photographer of the image,
Here...
Originally posted by ngchunter
Originally posted by wildespace
I see a very bright pixel following the comet (to the left and slightly lower), dimming out of view for a couple of seconds and then appearing again but fainter. If it's just a dodgy pixel on the sensor, it would be strange that it follows the comet. There's also a smaller (fainter) pixel to the upper left of the bright one, following in the same direction.
I'll ask around on astronomy goups.
The hot pixel will follow the motion of the telescope, which in this case was probably tracking the comet over time (either autoguiding on it or through external software). When he then went and made the gif animation he registered the images relative to the stars, not to the comet, thus the hot pixels follow the comet. I sent Mr. Lawrence a tweet and asked him to confirm this, will post his reply if he replies; he's fairly well-known in the UK and I'm sure quite busy.edit on 17-1-2013 by ngchunter because: (no reason given)
and here...
Originally posted by ngchunter
Incidentally, the photographer of OP's image, Pete Lawrence confirmed it was noise in the image (ie, hot pixels), and that the tracking drift of his telescope was coincidentally in the same direction as the comet over time.
"Pete Lawrence @Avertedvision
Yes there was a lot of talk on FaceBook and ATS here
Even got the picture of when the first was ask here and facebook
Originally posted by Insomniac
reply to post by mclinking
In that thread is a detailed explanation by a highly experienced astrophotographer confirming that the anomaly is in fact hot pixels followed by confirmation from the actual photographer of the image,
Here...
Originally posted by ngchunter
Originally posted by wildespace
I see a very bright pixel following the comet (to the left and slightly lower), dimming out of view for a couple of seconds and then appearing again but fainter. If it's just a dodgy pixel on the sensor, it would be strange that it follows the comet. There's also a smaller (fainter) pixel to the upper left of the bright one, following in the same direction.
I'll ask around on astronomy goups.
The hot pixel will follow the motion of the telescope, which in this case was probably tracking the comet over time (either autoguiding on it or through external software). When he then went and made the gif animation he registered the images relative to the stars, not to the comet, thus the hot pixels follow the comet. I sent Mr. Lawrence a tweet and asked him to confirm this, will post his reply if he replies; he's fairly well-known in the UK and I'm sure quite busy.edit on 17-1-2013 by ngchunter because: (no reason given)
and here...
Originally posted by ngchunter
Incidentally, the photographer of OP's image, Pete Lawrence confirmed it was noise in the image (ie, hot pixels), and that the tracking drift of his telescope was coincidentally in the same direction as the comet over time.
"Pete Lawrence @Avertedvision
Incorrect.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
States quite clearly that there is an asteroid and confirmed by others on this thread. What you have quoted precedes the Italian image. Neverthless, time will tell.
Originally posted by Insomniac
reply to post by mclinking
The Italian image predates the OP image. The Italian image does have asteroids in it, the OP's image only has one unrelated asteroid a long distance from the comet. If there were asteroids following the comet they would be in all images.
Originally posted by mclinking
Originally posted by Insomniac
reply to post by mclinking
The Italian image predates the OP image. The Italian image does have asteroids in it, the OP's image only has one unrelated asteroid a long distance from the comet. If there were asteroids following the comet they would be in all images.
If so, where have they gone?