The way I interpreted the OP's post was that he was asking people of faith how they feel about the discovery. As a person of faith (not speaking for
all people of faith), I feel it's an awesome discovery. There's no can of worms, no implication to my faith.
I'm using 'faith' without being specific because I feel that most with faith (regardless of type) probably feel roughly the same at the core...
They're all God's particles.
I sometimes wonder if folks with the perspective of the OP are trying to disprove God with science. Looking back in time, seeing very far, or seeing
things that are very small - doesn't disprove God. We're looking at His building blocks, we should be humbled (imo).
I've felt in the past, when considering the complexity of our universe, that there is no way it could maintain it's order without God. There would
be chaos everywhere, and nothing would exist.
Not to long ago I was watching The Universe on the History channel when a Scientist in a nut-shell stated that the more they learn, the more it's
starting to look like this universe was made by design. They equated the balance to all the beaches of the world - to remove one grain of sand would
cause nothing to exist. As though against all odds, the Universe seems purposefully custom tailored for Life. There was more to it than that, but that
was the gist.
I've seen examples like that both from the Scientific side, and the Faith side. They're talking, and finding common ground.
I don't plan to debate my opinion. Like I said, I sort of have a feeling the OP feels people of faith think the world exists by way of "Magic".
When the "trick" is discovered, you can't believe the Magician is Magic any more.
I understand the logic - but as a learned person with faith, I would be offended if you insinuated I thought the world was magic; and would propose
that you have a narrow world view. I'd suggest that you speak with other educated people with faith.. not to gain faith, but to learn how we actually
feel - instead of supposing it.
If I'm off on your underlying sentiment OP just disregard the above.
So that's how this person with faith feels about it... They're all God's particles, and they were and are, already all there. We're like children
in relation, learning / discovering something "new" - when in fact the particle is necessary for you to exist, so you can look for it in the first
place...
Kind of like nothing "new" was found, but we did confirm we were right about how we thought something works, that's been working since the dawn of
time.. How that relates to people's feelings about God seems to far removed to be debatable, or to even be a conversation. Here's what I mean:
If you were to say "I learned how to make pie, now how do you feel about high taxes!!" I'd assume what you really want to talk about is taxes; not
pie - and that you had a chip on your shoulder about high taxes from your approach. What it really boils down to is you want to tell me how you feel
about taxes. Not a worthwhile conversation to the other person, but they'd probably like to have some of your pie.
In short - the discovery is your proof, and it's mine. The more we learn, the closer that common ground gets. Eventually the two camps will be
neighbours, borrowing sugar from each other - it's inevitable, but a slow process - we're only human after all.