It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by intrptr
reply to post by _BoneZ_
Your posts are way to long to prompt any further interest from me on here. Maybe if you took it one or two points at a time instead of carpet bombing the whole page...
regardless, have a nice thread... I'm out.
If you're going to do a comparison, you have to show a fire-induced collapse of a steel-structured highrise and how it compares to the collapses on 9/11.
Everyone knows Scott Forbes who came forward in 2004 about the power down on the weekend before 9/11. Another gentleman by the name of Gary Corbett came forward in 2010 with his proof of employment at the WTC, and he also confirmed the power down on the weekend before 9/11.
"Because United 93 was intended to hit WTC 7 and when that plane got taken out of the sky above Pennsylvania prematurely they had to continue there plan and bring WTC 7 down.
You cant have a building loaded with explosives just sitting there when the insurance agency sends their people in to assess the damage. So they had to 'pull' the building.
Or how about the NANO thermate found in all the dust samples - only made in one or two places at best?
And then there is the FACT that one of the planes that hit the WTC was NOT a passenger plane at all, but a military plane.
Originally posted by samkent
Here [/url] ya go.
And it started with a little old vending machine fire.
Originally posted by samkent
Please explain what shutting down power and rigging a building have to do with each other?
Originally posted by samkent
Totally debunked. You must be reading older conspiracy rants on this subect.
Originally posted by JiggyPotamus
And then there is the FACT that one of the planes that hit the WTC was NOT a passenger plane at all, but a military plane. Countless people are recorder, there on the street as this was happening, saying that the plane was a military aircraft. People know what a passenger aircraft looks like, and what everyone saw was definitely not in that category.
Originally posted by br0ker
Give it a rest already. Everyone knows it was an inside job.. but it cant and never will be prooved or admitted. Do you really think they`d do that and selfimplode the country??? Immagine the repurcussions... staging a war like that by killing off your own citizens.
Originally posted by samkent
reply to post by Danbones
remember the kennedy bullet U-Turn?
They never said it did a u turn. Conspiracy people did.
"According to the Warren Report the missile hit JFK in the posterior neck, then without striking any hard object passed through the neck to exit at the front of his throat. It then entered Texas Governor John B. Connally's back at the right arm pit, sliding along his fifth rib, demolishing four inches of the rib before it exited his chest below the right nipple. The bullet then allegedly struck and shattered the radius of the right wrist on the dorsal side, then exited at the base of his palm and hit his left thigh just about the knee. The Report then asserts that CE 399 traveled about three inches beneath the surface of the skin, hit the femur and deposited a lead fragment on the bone. Then, sometime later, with a spasm of reverse kinetic energy it spontaneously exited the hole in Connally's thigh and neatly tucked itself under the mattress of a stretcher parked in a hallway of the Parkland Memorial Hospital that the Report asserted was linked to the wounded governor. There it rested calmly under the mattress waiting for its rendezvous with history."
Originally posted by ANOK
Millions of threads discussing this, but the smoking gun that WTC 7 was imploded is the FACT that the majority of the building landed in it's own footprint, evidenced by the outer walls being on top of the debris pile.
In a natural collapse the outer walls would be under the rubble, not on top, path of least resistance and all that. It takes timed controlled explosives to make the outer walls fold in on top of the rest of the collapsed building, exactly what an implosion demolition is designed to do.
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
Comparing a concrete-structured building to a steel-structured building is dishonest, misleading, and a form of trickery to the lay person who isn't versed in building construction or demolition techniques, and building collapse history.
Originally posted by wmd_2008
Can you show a natural collapse then video & (or) pictures
Originally posted by wmd_2008
Also the simple fact that the OTHER buildings you and others continue to compare the towers with are NOT 100+ floors high of a tube in tube design were floors can fall internally in the structure!!!
Originally posted by ANOK
Originally posted by wmd_2008
Can you show a natural collapse then video & (or) pictures
Can you?
Where is your vid and pics of a steel framed building that collapsed from fire and had the same outcome as WTC 7?
Can you demonstrate that sagging trusses can pull in columns?
Here is a vid of implosion demolitions, notice the similarities to WTC 7, the penthouse drops first, the outer walls lean inwards (the so-called lean of WTC 7), and the outer walls end up sitting on top of the rubble. Buildings do not collapse that way naturally.
Now can you find a multi story steel framed building that collapsed from fire, that falls like an implosion demolition?
edit on 4/8/2013 by ANOK because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by samkent
Interesting how you chose video from implosionworld when they explicitly state that 911 was not CD.