It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Operation Thunderdome: How The US Will Unravel. And Soon. (Important)

page: 12
121
<< 9  10  11    13  14  15 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 14 2013 @ 10:54 AM
link   
reply to post by kronos11
 


The only thing we have to fear is wetting our pants laughing at how afraid the unprepared are.

Other than that, what do you think of this Honey Boo Boo phenomenon?



posted on Mar, 14 2013 @ 11:12 AM
link   
reply to post by neformore
 


maybe for some, it is a partisan issue...but to me, and i'm sure a lot of us, it's just a continuation of something that's been in the works for decades..

this is bigger than bush1, clinton, bush2, obama, or those who came before them..obama is just the latest puppet in place to keep up the illusion, and continue the conditioning of the people..

do i completely believe everything in the op? no.

do i believe the U.S. Federal government is bought, paid for, and is nothing more than a show anymore, and no longer represents our interests? absolutely.

am i willing to completely rule out any theories simply based on politics, or my personal opinion of how odd they may sound? absolutely not.

that's the essence of denying ignorance..



posted on Mar, 14 2013 @ 11:19 AM
link   
reply to post by kyviecaldges
 


Your right about the ammo for the military, but what he's talking about is a stockpile of 3 billion rounds by DHS not the pentagon. Why does DHS need 10 rounds for every Citizen?



posted on Mar, 14 2013 @ 11:19 AM
link   

Originally posted by InverseLookingGlass
reply to post by MRuss
 


Obama supporters have infiltrated the internet! chuckle...

Come out of the bunker already. 150,000,000 people voted for him. The people "against" Obama are against the United States as defined in the Constitution. Maybe you don't like the outcome? fine but defecating on the country when the election doesn't turn out the way you want makes you a whiny narcissist, not a patriot.

Try living life and enriching your spirit instead of gargling with poison every day.


perhaps you should town down the rhetoric, and your belittling tone...

if you actually believe 150 million people voted this piss-poor leader back in for a second term, i've got some prime everglades real-estate i'd love to give you a hell of a deal on.. did you happen to vote for him?

simple fact of the matter is that while there is a large section of the population who is stupid enough, and gullible enough, that they would vote for a second term for this liar, the sad truth is that voter fraud exists, and has existed for quite a long while... presidential elections are no longer fair, or honest. it's all a show..



posted on Mar, 14 2013 @ 11:22 AM
link   
Interesting OP, star and flag!
I read a great deal and also have found myself becoming more of an "observer of life" as I have much to lose if this all plays out as described.

People are fed up.

Everywhere I go, no matter the demographic or state or gathering,people are conversing, discussing, womdering,and honestly? They are MUCH more aware than I've ever experienced before, especially the "Baby Boomers" among us! I have never heard such informed and consistant conversations with disregard to political-preference, everyone is disgusted.

Many of us have worked damnned HARD for what we have and we're not going to continue to allow the "whittling away" of our resources to continue much longer.

I don't have answers but absolutely sense and realize that "change" IS coming and I sure hope that it won't be as dire as this OP...I truly believe that when the TOTAL fiasco that is "Obamacare" hits, a tipping-point will be met.
They have no intention of helping ot manage and maintain the "health and well-being" of the US people but from what I read (and the documents are out there), it's an outright "grab" of even more resources, complete with threats, fines, taxes, and all manner of political-voodoo intended to scare many people into submission.

I don't see things going much past this point one way or another, people will react.

Personally? the fact that Michelle Obama is on the cover of "Vogue" magazine (April 2013) with an accompaning article about the "influence of the Obama's" is freaking me out...



posted on Mar, 14 2013 @ 11:23 AM
link   
reply to post by coltcall
 



With a comment like this (the whole "laughing" thing) it makes me wonder just how well our society will do on the other side of the "event" when its only hope are the heartless like you. With all the time and resources that have clearly been at your disposal over the years, have you thought about saving any other butt than your own? If you do make it, you don’t deserve to. It is this sort of isolation from our humanity that got us in this situation.

By the way, take a look at my avatar. You're asking me if I know Chaos Theory? Do you think I picked it because I thought it was pretty? It is you who needs to understand the theory better. Again, I (at least I) understand the science behind the “event” (known “knowns”, known “unknowns”, and unknown “unknowns”) but what’s the science in preparation? Where do you start? What’s the estimated minimum? If one has the funds, how does one prepare? Why can’t you (for the sake of thought experiment) assume there is at least a year left?

Oh, and thanks for the advice. You can't even try, can you? By the sound of it, you're wanting it to come, if only for the entertainment value. You know, I think you might be sick.

edit on 14-3-2013 by Philodemus because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 14 2013 @ 11:26 AM
link   

Originally posted by MRuss
reply to post by Tw0Sides
 


I'm not talking numbers here, my friend.

Who said anything about numbers?

My point is something entirely different.

Does it disgust you to see what's really happening in the world, or are we going to sit here and talk about numbers?

This is NOT a democratic vs. republican debate.

Did you read my post?

It involves people on BOTH sides of the aisle.


[color=6699FF]I fiercely and thoroughly agree.

However, evidently the Ulsterman link is not the source of so many of your quotes which come from Hagman?

Could you please post a list of all the sources you used?

Would be greatly appreciated. I need to correct an email to loved ones.



posted on Mar, 14 2013 @ 11:31 AM
link   

Originally posted by Hopechest
reply to post by MRuss
 


A one world government simply is not possible. Its been tried numerous times and failed miserably. There are simply too many people with too many different values, religions, beliefs.......to all fit nicely under one set of rules and its impossible to enforce.


The only way to control the world is secretly from the shadows where nobody knows you are doing it. Those with just even a smidgeon of historical knowledge know this.


= = = =

[color=6699FF]Wellllllllllllll

Almighty God disagrees . . . see the books of Daniel, Ezekiel, Revelation, Mat 24 etc.

The satanic globalist oligarchy WILL be in OVERT rule over the whole planet for at least 3.5-7 years. Christ WILL destroy all the evil doers at the literal Armageddon.

Satan and his fallen angels have been working toward the great END TIMES DECEPTION for many thousands of years. Using the fallen angels as all powerful critters from space will cause the world in great chaos to jump at order, peace, food, even
!CONTROL!

BTW, I don't know what percentage of naysayers on such threads are likely paid oligarchy/Obama . . . agents . . . to be polite . . . but I suspect that on ATS, the percentage has to be pretty high.

.

edit on 14/3/2013 by BO XIAN because: fix tags



posted on Mar, 14 2013 @ 11:39 AM
link   

Originally posted by MRuss
reply to post by kaylaluv
 


But I'd have to gently ask you to put THREE good years of study, of reading, of thinking, of talking to others, of going to the library, of putting on a serious thinking cap..

before you discount something you seem to know so little about.


I've studied globalism for more than 45 years. Your OP has got to be fairly close to accurate.

Actually, one could just take the Biblical prophecies and extrapolate from Israel becoming a nation in 1948 . . . and figure out how the satanic globalists would have to advance things in order to have it completed in one generation or less. The evidence has been hidden in plain sight for many decades.


This list of quotes is a good place to start:


twoday.net...



posted on Mar, 14 2013 @ 11:41 AM
link   

Originally posted by MystikMushroom

Originally posted by solomons path
reply to post by MRuss
 


Isn't this old . . . like at least a couple months?

I read this "interview with the informant" before. Once before the election and then another after the 1st of the year . . . all the same info.

I'm even pretty sure there is another thread somewhere around here that posted when the latest interview appeared on the blog.


I knew I couldn't be the only person that swears they've read this before.

In regards to the OP...

Lets do some simple math:

The population of the United States is roughly 313,914,040. According to globalsecurity.org, the entire military has about 3,017,414 personel. That number includes reservists and guard memebers.

That would be one service member for every 104 Americans. I don't know about you, but with those numbers I don't see how the government could have enough manpower to exercise complete martial law. Remember, that not everyone in the military is fit for a combat role either.

Now, with the technology that the US military has at their disposal it might make crowd management easier, but to have 104 souls for every single person employed by the military? That's a big stretch.

When you do the math and look at it logically, the only way that the OP's scenario would work is with foreign troops.
edit on 13-3-2013 by MystikMushroom because: (no reason given)

>implying every single person would be capable of taking on soldiers.

How many of those 313,914,040 are old people, small weak people with no weapons, women, children and physically/mentally handicapped people?

Your point isn't really valid, because every single one of those 104 people to every 1 soldier you mentioned isn't necessarily capable of striking back.



posted on Mar, 14 2013 @ 11:42 AM
link   

Originally posted by coltcall
reply to post by kronos11
 


The only thing we have to fear is wetting our pants laughing at how afraid the unprepared are.



LOL

You're quite funny if you think you can defend yourself (and family) against a properly trained and organized military. Iraq and Afghanistan has proven that quite adequately. The people in those countries have been in hot war for literally centuries.

The likeliest thing to happen shortterm is that China will cash debts, Europe will follow and the world will sit and watch while the Americans tear themselves apart. End of problem.



posted on Mar, 14 2013 @ 11:47 AM
link   
reply to post by Philodemus
 


The lamestream mainstream media and the federal government has performed masterfully in lulling socialists into a false sense of security. All this hoopla about being 'My brother's keeper,' doesn't include we have to take care of your brothers. We take care of our brothers.

Is it heartless? No. It's nature. It's reality. It's social Darwinism at its most strategic.

It's all about crime and punishment. The crime is that socialists fell for the claptrap. The punishment is that they have become victims of their own fate.

We never feel guilty about the decisions other people make for themselves. When you play, you eventually must pay.



posted on Mar, 14 2013 @ 11:49 AM
link   
reply to post by callousbastard
 


We're very friendly with our military and we have nothing to fear from our military.

As for others, well, if you behave yourselves you might be okay. Alas, history shows you socialists don't know how to behave yourselves.



posted on Mar, 14 2013 @ 11:50 AM
link   

Originally posted by MRuss
I realize that this is interesting to debate, and I appreciate the interest.

But I do want to ask the folks who have a grasp on what's going on a few questions:

Has anyone else researched the infiltration of the web by this Obama group? I wrote the name of the organization in my OP. Is it worth looking into?

Has anyone seen any other references to March and April on any other sites?

Has anyone died lately (in the past few months) under suspicious circumstances?

Some of these points in my OP could reveal themselves if they were fleshed out.



No. I haven't and won't.

I do enough . . . as it is.

I have seen a few sources claim that something dramatic may happen in March or April. Some of those are personal net friend sources and some are run of the mill sorts of sites that talk about prophetic things.

I would suggest leaving the OB cyber troops alone. I don't think there's any way you can win that one.



posted on Mar, 14 2013 @ 11:52 AM
link   
reply to post by libertytoall
 


It's mystifying to me how folks can assert that being more than

[color=6699FF]$100 TRILLION in DEBT will NOT result in a collapse of any kind.

I realize it's all Monopoly money . . . but the Monopoly bankers are determined to crash the system. And they are well able to do it.



posted on Mar, 14 2013 @ 11:55 AM
link   

Originally posted by Hopechest
reply to post by Yngvarr
 


I wonder how many of those it would take to control 300 million people.

Quite a few I imagine.

Look at the Japanese internment. The government put around 110,000 in camps and basically couldn't control them. It wasn't violence that was the problem, it was logistics...keeping them housed and fed. The camps eventually became open so the people could fend for themselves.
. . .

Once they did you saw immediate changes in the communist system.

There is simply no way to outright go to war with the American populace and hope to win.


All the past tyrants the last 200 years have been experiments . . . they've been refining their methodologies, goals, strategies.

They'll exterminate or try and exterminate far more than are left to control . . . as far as their planning goes.

God will throw some monkey wrenches in their plans.



posted on Mar, 14 2013 @ 12:11 PM
link   
Okay so the quintessence of the article, and the only portrayed solution is twofold:

1. Stock up on Guns and Ammunition

2. Stock up on food and survival equipment


Reads to me like a custom tailored ad for gun and survival stores. And Obama and his mother are the masterminds and pulling the strings ? You've got to be kidding me. Alone the thought is beyond ridiculous.



posted on Mar, 14 2013 @ 12:12 PM
link   
reply to post by H1ght3chHippie
 


Everyone has the alternative not to stock up on food and ammo.

It's not like a mandatory thing, ya know.

Everyone makes their own decisions....and lives with their own consequences.



posted on Mar, 14 2013 @ 12:13 PM
link   

Originally posted by kaylaluv

Originally posted by FissionSurplus


Get rid of free nations, force people into restricted areas where they can be tracked and monitored, and, perhaps, throw a little eugenics in there to cull the herd, and you can then implement a world which belongs to a few rich creeps with ultimate control.


But even the few rich creeps don't agree with each other. Warren Buffet doesn't agree with the Koch brothers, who don't agree with Bill Gates. And then you have the Arabian oil-rich creeps, who may want their religion to be the religion of the world. Some of the other rich creeps won't like that.



From:


twoday.net...

.



86."Do not believe for an instant that the world's conspiring elite in every nation have so much as a serious quarrel among them. They have just one object: control through tribute. Your slavery, through tribute, and mine... Behind this attack are the self-styled elite, secure in their own power and riches... "To be effective we must direct our attacks on the real criminals, the wealthy, and powerful and secret elite of all the world--the conspirators laboring day and night to enslave us." Taylor Caldwell The Captains and the Kings 1974


Terminal head-in-the-sand habits

are NOT good survival habits.



posted on Mar, 14 2013 @ 12:17 PM
link   

Originally posted by callousbastard

Originally posted by coltcall
reply to post by kronos11
 


The only thing we have to fear is wetting our pants laughing at how afraid the unprepared are.



LOL

You're quite funny if you think you can defend yourself (and family) against a properly trained and organized military. Iraq and Afghanistan has proven that quite adequately. The people in those countries have been in hot war for literally centuries.

The likeliest thing to happen shortterm is that China will cash debts, Europe will follow and the world will sit and watch while the Americans tear themselves apart. End of problem.


i tend to disagree with that assessment. if afghanistan has taught us ANYTHING, it's that even a militia, consisting of farmers and goat herders living in caves, can defeat a properly trained and organized army. they bankrupted the russians, they've bankrupting us, we have not won in afganistan, and we never will...

nothing short of glassing the entire country will produce a "victory"

if the american people, even with our scary black guns were such a non-threat, why does the federal government feel it is imperative that they disarm us?



new topics

top topics



 
121
<< 9  10  11    13  14  15 >>

log in

join