It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I found this article on Popsci.
A Swedish man modified an RC airplane, stuck a camera on it, and then flew it to space and back.
By Kelsey D. AthertonPosted 03.11.2013 at 5:00 pm
A fascimile of Earth, as seen from an RC plane Photo stitched from 50 video frames captured by the GoPro2, carried aboard an RC controlled plane, at an altitude of roughly 18.5 miles. David Windestål, of RCExplorer.se
David Windestål of Sweden had a different idea. What if, instead of just sending a camera into space, he sent a drone? Well, technically an RC model plane. Here's how he did it:
Windestål picked the FunJet, an RC plane with enough interior space to hold the gadgets he wanted to add.
The video transmitter allows for first-person-view remote control flying.
The most inventive part of Windestål's design is the mechanism that releases the plane from the hydrogen balloon that carries it to space.
A Swedish man modified an RC airplane, stuck a camera on it, and then flew it to space and back.
By Kelsey D. AthertonPosted 03.11.2013 at 5:00 pm
Originally posted by silverking
This is so awesome! I bet the GoPro company loves this guy.
Do you need some kind of permit to do this?
Thanks for posting.
Originally posted by wmd_2008
reply to post by SilentE
A Swedish man modified an RC airplane, stuck a camera on it, and then flew it to space and back.
By Kelsey D. AthertonPosted 03.11.2013 at 5:00 pm
That piece of text is very misleading as you think the plane was flown under its own power up and back!
Also this image will do the same.
Some people will look at that the wrong way as well, if they don't read the link which a lot of members on here don't do,they will then jump to conclusions that are not true.
s&f for the thread this will get some interesting posts no doubt.
Originally posted by wmd_2008
reply to post by SilentE
I wasn't trying to say that you were trying to mislead us, I do read the links but as I said many other people don't then jump to conclusions and all sort of cr4p gets post.
I will give you an example on here someone posted a giga pixel picture thread with links, if you read the link the picture was taken on a computer controlled tripod using a normal DSLR camera, the people that didn't read the link posted comments about secret camera tech and why doesn't NASA have cameras like that etc etc.
Don't be surprised if similar things happen on this thread!
Originally posted by Shadow Herder
I think the point that is being overlooked is that people can send things into space without rockets. The U.s have been flying one man craft into space since the 50's. The switched over to super rockets to also fund the missile war plans against the russians.
Originally posted by wildespace
reply to post by SilentE
Pretty much what Felix Baumgartner had done. Problem is, what do you do once you're up there? The balloon will burst sooner or later, so the only option is jump. It's not like you can achive the orbital speed using just the balloon.
Originally posted by wildespace
reply to post by SilentE
Pretty much what Felix Baumgartner had done. Problem is, what do you do once you're up there? The balloon will burst sooner or later, so the only option is jump. It's not like you can achive the orbital speed using just the balloon.
Originally posted by StargateSG7
reply to post by SilentE
---
I might have a go at this...we've already got three Canon 5D's
(i.e. fully 1920 by 1080p at super-fast 60 fps video when modded)
and while our insurance company would an absolute
heart attack at sending such cameras to near-space,
I think this might make for an interesting project.
So while I won't send up the Canon 5D's or a Canon C300/C500,
I did notice that some Canon Powershot Rugged cameras
with REALLY AWESOME QUALITY HDTV VIDEO were
less than $500 each. They're not as rugged the GoPro,
but the colour rendition, sharpness and video quality is 3x better!
See this Canon PowerShot 12.1MP Digital Camera (G15) - Black:
www.futureshop.ca... 02
Put these cameras on a gyro-stabilized glider and let her rip!
As a suggestion, STACK multiple balloons and put HALF the
helium in it so that the balloon's gas-bag can expand MORE
before bursting. By using the multiple balloons, you can lift
the same weight BUT the balloons won't burst until you get
HIGHER than the earlier attampt. My guess is a balloon burst
at about 37,000 to 40,000 metres altitude.
If I knew the tensile strength, (PSI - Pounds per Square Inch)
before fabric failure of the balloon fabric and the initial helium
gas volume, we could calculate burst height pretty accurately.
This is ONE WAY to get a higher height without using booster
rockets as some high-altitude RC (Remote Rontrol) aircraft
explorers have done previously.