posted on Mar, 12 2013 @ 06:49 AM
I've said it once, and i'll say it again: These acts will be the neccessary catalyst for governments to legitimize internet censorship and complete
internet control. Because of this, we should be asking why release these particular financial records?
We have automobile industries that use fear and murder in order to suppress alternative fuels and information regarding technology that can lead to
the average person saving money/time in their life. Hell, look what they did to the guy who invented the windsheild wiper!
We have big pharma who will stop at nothing to corrupt natural cures for diseases, namely cancer. So many examples of large industries that are doing
traceable crimes, which if brought to light in court would stand for justice.
Yet, these hackers - somehow skilled enough to get financial records of an attorney general and FBI director - decide to release information and use
their skills for purposes that ultimately lead to no power structure change in the very power structure people claim they are somehow exposing.
In the end, all these 'anons' and all these 'hackers', all the way back to Julian Assange seem to do nothing. Releasing no information that
creates a change in the system it claims to be exposing - yet at the same time committing crimes worth condemning the free use of internet and
Since that is the case, it is possible that most of these hackers and controlled hack groups, are either inside jobs or entirely controlled outside
jobs being used for a grand scheme of one day getting rid of the free internet.