posted on Mar, 12 2013 @ 05:14 PM
reply to post by smurfy
Well I agree that aircraft exhausts are not so innocent, though I would say not so harmless, as there is no intent in their creation beyond transport.
I also agree that lots of things have been and can be done with aircraft. They are very versatile indeed.
However I think that the small matter of contrails having been sampled, analysed and studied trumps any claims about what chemtrails 'might' be by
some excitable chaps on the Internet. I'm still waiting for the evidence that links 'trails' to GE. Seriously. Some guys reading about GE
dispersal proposals and theories, then looking at contrails and thinking it might look the same doesn't cut it for me. There are many reasons why GE
SRM techniques would look nothing like contrails at all. These include the dispersal of small particles 7 miles high. I don't see how anyone would
see that at all, much less an instant thick cloudy trail. Now, if the water content of the trail was to freeze immediately in super saturated air at
minus 30 degrees, I understand how that would leave a highly visible trail.
Do you see my position?.