It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by theMediator
With so many new, invented words coming out everyday I always found deadly suspicious that the now common word chemtrail isn't in any dictionary. Just that fact enhances the chemtrails conspiracy even more.
Originally posted by theMediator
The same thing yet, I don't exhale burnt petroleum. So it's not the same thing.
Originally posted by theMediator
This thread is about plane emissions causing shadows in google earth pictures not if chemtrails exist or not.
Originally posted by theMediator
You debating against me this way wasn't very productive imo.
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
Originally posted by TriForce
And theres no evidence that says that some "contrails" arent chemtrail sprays.
Every single trail in the sky is a contrail. That's the word that was created and chosen for those trails. If you want to make up words and call those trails anything other than contrails, you have to first get some physical evidence, and some scientific evidence.
Since there is neither, the word doesn't exist, and neither does the suggested theory.
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
Originally posted by smurfy
The popular form is derived in exactly the same way as the word contrails was formed.
The word "chemtrail" is neither popular, nor proper. It's a made-up word by the few fear-mongerers left who keep peddling the "chemtrail" disinformation.
Originally posted by smurfy
Nobody seems to mind too much about talking the science of contrails
That's because the science of contrails is a known and proven science. We know how they are formed, and how they can persist or not.
Originally posted by smurfy
but when it comes to chemtrails, all of a sudden there is no science, when in fact there is.
There never has been any repeatable, provable science. Ever. Has anyone gone up and tried to capture the "spray" from a "chemtrail" to examine the particles in a lab? Has anyone gotten any swabs of objects that sit outside all day and night under the "heavily sprayed" skies to see what's being "sprayed"?
If you have some repeatable, provable science showing that some contrails are "chemtrails", then please post it for us. We've been waiting for years for real scientific evidence of "chemtrails".
What are you waiting for?
Originally posted by clairvoyantrose
How did I know Phage was going to be one of the first posters here?
Originally posted by TriForce
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
Originally posted by TriForce
And theres no evidence that says that some "contrails" arent chemtrail sprays.
Every single trail in the sky is a contrail. That's the word that was created and chosen for those trails. If you want to make up words and call those trails anything other than contrails, you have to first get some physical evidence, and some scientific evidence.
Since there is neither, the word doesn't exist, and neither does the suggested theory.
Personally I dont really care one way or another, its just the arrogance of some people that try and absolutely say that something isnt happening, when you no more know the truth than the people that believe that chemicals are being sprayed.
As if you know even 1% of what the government, NASA, or some possibly unknown Black Ops organization does, about the same as I and 99% of the rest of the world.
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
Originally posted by theMediator
With so many new, invented words coming out everyday I always found deadly suspicious that the now common word chemtrail isn't in any dictionary. Just that fact enhances the chemtrails conspiracy even more.
So, because there's no physical or scientific evidence to even make up this new word, you're suspicious that a new word that has no basis to even exist, isn't in the dictionary yet? Now that is hilarious.
Originally posted by theMediator
I mean, Santa Claus is in the dictionary.
Originally posted by smurfy
I did say that you were correct in that you cannot tell a contrail from a chemtrail
Originally posted by smurfy
and since chemtrail is in the Oxford dictionaries it is now a word
Originally posted by theMediator
Santa Claus is a word in the dictionary
There is no physical evidence, no scientific evidence yet it's in the dictionary.
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
Originally posted by clairvoyantrose
How did I know Phage was going to be one of the first posters here?
Because he's a reliable source of information and chemtrails are bunk?
Definition of chemtrail
noun
a visible trail left in the sky by an aircraft and believed by some to consist of chemical or biological agents released as part of a covert operation, rather than the condensed water of a vapour trail:
conspiracy theorists have been going wild with speculation over the nature and purpose of chemtrails
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
Originally posted by theMediator
Santa Claus is a word in the dictionary
There is no physical evidence, no scientific evidence yet it's in the dictionary.
There's no basis at all for the word "chemtrail".
edit on 11-3-2013 by _BoneZ_ because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
reply to post by _BoneZ_
IMO it is irrelevant whther the word is in any given dictionary or not - that is jsut a measure of how common its useage is - no dictionary has the "power" to sday what is or isnt' a word.
dictionary or not - there is stil no actual evidence chemtrails exist, and everything that gets described as a chemtrail looks and bheaves exactly liek a contrail.
Originally posted by smurfy
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
Originally posted by theMediator
Santa Claus is a word in the dictionary
There is no physical evidence, no scientific evidence yet it's in the dictionary.
There's no basis at all for the word "chemtrail".
Why is there not?
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
there is stil no actual evidence chemtrails exist,
Originally posted by Phage
there is no evidence that "chemtrails" are anything other than contrails.
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
There never has been any repeatable, provable science. Ever. Has anyone gone up and tried to capture the "spray" from a "chemtrail" to examine the particles in a lab? Has anyone gotten any swabs of objects that sit outside all day and night under the "heavily sprayed" skies to see what's being "sprayed"?
If you have some repeatable, provable science showing that some contrails are "chemtrails", then please post it for us. We've been waiting for years for real scientific evidence of "chemtrails".
What are you waiting for?
Originally posted by Clairaudience
There is no such thing as "chemtrails". They are called contrails.
Originally posted by smurfy
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
reply to post by _BoneZ_
dictionary or not - there is stil no actual evidence chemtrails exist, and everything that gets described as a chemtrail looks and bheaves exactly liek a contrail.
I give you a star for that, much better than chemtrails/Chemtrails are bunk.
Originally posted by waynos
reply to post by smurfy
I would say because the word was only coined as a buzzword by the likes of Will Thomas And his cohorts as a means to promote sales of their cures without any actual, tangible, reason to say that chemtrails were being sprayed.
Geo-engineering is not chemtrails. Chemtrails are merely misidentified contrails, they do not require a second name.
Originally posted by smurfy
their are multiple patents which clearly describe a use in geoengineering,
Originally posted by smurfy
The expression Chemtrails was used "Quotes En Quote" on the Art Bell show prior to the Will Thomas book's release however, the first sentence in part is probably correct, the rest is as intangible as hearsay.
Second sentence, yet you too gave them a second name, "merely misidentified contrails" in your opinion,
all the while their are multiple patents which clearly describe a use in geoengineering, and military uses. More is needed.