It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by tide88
reply to post by Arken
The problem with you lizard picture is the tip of the head is actually part of the formation behind it and is not part of the "lizard" you claim. Once you realize this, you can easily see that is just a normal rock.
Originally posted by impaired
Originally posted by Soapusmaximus
Just to add Arkan, you would be more likely to find aliens by flashing a laser pen in the sky.
Why do you waste peoples time with this? Do you think they would release picture after picture with all kinds of Earth animals in them (as you keep claiming) and let the cat out the bag (of a presence on mars - refer to the Infra-red imaging done by the soviets I think- and the Phobos probe incident) as easy as that after all the years of denial?
Your stuff should start getting put in the hoax bin, its such a waste of time and effort.
He just believes what he wants to believe. Despite the fact that the evidence against him is right here for him, he refuses to acknowledge it - LIKE THE 3D IMAGES. That's the smoking gun that it doesn't even look like a lizard.
It's when people have cognitive dissonance and they can't change their position. In this case, it sucks because it's science, and it's being skewed and made a mockery of. It offends common sense. And like we've been saying - there is no ecosystem on Mars. That, the radiation, the atmosphere, the lack of LIQUID water. It's not likely. At all.
And yet ONCE AGAIN. We have 3D images that show these "creatures" for what they really are.
Arken will NOT respond to me about that and keeps dodging it.
And when I told him to go to this forum where the actual MSL team posts, he said he won't because 1: Some guy (The Science Guy?) runs it (who actually doesn't, but Arken still believes this and won't post - THE worse excuse I have ever heard from someone in a case like this).
2: He also says he won't post there because you can't discuss astrobiology. But you can still ask what those rocks are and how they got there. But he won't do even that.
There are so many things he could do but he won't. He just wants the attention - hence the multiple threads. He thrives off of the attention.
And that is why he won't look at the 3D images - because he knows that he will not like what he sees.
Hate me. Think I'm disinfo ( ). Think I'm a detractor. Whatever.
Just because I am showing proof that is in contrast to the OP...
So, yet again, I challenge Arken and anyone who takes his word for Gospel to check the 3D images. I do not (I can't) create them - someone else does. They are way too hard for me to pull off, so it's not like I am advertising my work.
I am advertising the truth and the motto "Deny Ignorance".
More 3D images are available if you folks want to check them out. I'll post the links again if you want. And you only need those old-school 3D Anaglyph glasses to see it (only about $3 USD).
Mars looks really cool in 3D, and the landscape looks completely deceiving as opposed to 2D. And like I said, Arken's creatures are just rocks. Shadows and other rocks in the foreground and the background are being called parts of these "creatures".
Please. Deny ignorance. I'm not here to bust your bubbles. I'm just here to show you what I see! Rocks! I challenge you to see for yourself.edit on 3/12/2013 by impaired because: Grammar.
Originally posted by AceWombat04
P.S. Or better yet, an alien riding a ram-like goat type creature. I'm not making fun. These are really things I saw in the picture. (Not that I believe that's what they are but I'm not pulling stuff our of my you-know-what either.)
Originally posted by Skywatcher2011
[
What the....???????
Oh man
Yeah, I could see an alien "riding" or even "tapping" the sheep.....bwahahahahahahahahahah
Oh this made my morning coffee experience even better! Thank you for the laugh.edit on 13-3-2013 by Skywatcher2011 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by impaired
I'm talking about the 3D images!!! That has NOTHING to do with Bill Nye!
Also - Bill Nye has nothing to do with Unmanned SpaceFlight.com. I don't even know where you got that connection from. I also fail to see the relevance.
You constantly skirt my questions and give feeble excuses.
AGAIN.
*snip*
Originally posted by LadyGreenEyes
Originally posted by impaired
I'm talking about the 3D images!!! That has NOTHING to do with Bill Nye!
Also - Bill Nye has nothing to do with Unmanned SpaceFlight.com. I don't even know where you got that connection from. I also fail to see the relevance.
You constantly skirt my questions and give feeble excuses.
AGAIN.
*snip*
Link? Source? The one link you posted some pages back didn't load at all, after several minutes. I can't locate any 3-D images on the NASA site, though I CAN locate the image from the OP there. So, exactly what real, credible source are we to use for these 3-D images?
Originally posted by ThinkingCap
Whenever I see your threads, I always ignore everything and look straight to the picture.
First thing I noticed was exactly as your title said: a damned lizard.
Great find.
New Mexico is one mysterious place, eh?
Originally posted by eriktheawful
Originally posted by jazztrance
I have a good question,,,,WHY WHY WHY are the pics so blurry and crappy. Seems like they would use atleast a 4 megapixel camera.
The original picture is not blurry and crappy:
However, if your crop and then over zoom in, like any picture, yes, it becomes blurry and crappy.