posted on Mar, 15 2013 @ 12:39 AM
reply to post by Mizzijr
None here with me.
All my arguments, regardless the tone of delivery are utterly devoid of any personal emotional attachment.
Unlike some folk that visit this site and post, I don't get offended over little words on a screen.
Why would anyone? It's not like any one here is going to win some shiny sparkly prize for punching points on topic or off.
Sad that so many seem to lack the maturity of objective detachment where they thus embroil themselves into investing emotional bank into these silly
Back on topic though; We've discussed how the terms "playing god" and/or "unnatural" are entirely impotent since man is the epitome of
unnatural in all things and works done as well as being well schooled in playing god also since the dawn of mankind.
It's also been exampled that even IF souls were a valid point of argument, the existence of human Monsters throughout history, who all were born,
raised, educated, and grown to adulthood not very differently from their peers, all became Monsters of their own free will without the interference
of, or requirement for Science as explanation for their "souless" actions.
Thus, with or without soul has no meaning as it applies to GeneMods. Monsters are going to happen with or without souls, and with or without Genetic
We thus then come back to the argument of ego: People protest the idea simply because the idea personally repulses them for whatever, or even no
reason at all.
Barring any additional vectors of protest against Genetic modification, it's seen that all current protests are the stuff of selfish ego and
irrational paranoid fear while arguments supporting Genetic Modification tout benefit for any and all the development of the technology could serve.