It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Are you saying Gary Johnson is a liberal? Interesting
Do two wrongs make a right Seeker? I'd like a response from you on this.
where did I claim this?
"NO I DO NOT!"
Originally posted by Southern Guardian
reply to post by beezzer
I'm not interested in your little games. What I am interested in are these merits you speak of that O'Keefe's investigation produce again? Considering that you feel these merits outweigh the fact he mislead people? If you can let me know, I'd happily respond.
No they do not, clearly you understand this, then why bring up the 2008 voter fraud committed by ACORN staff members to excuse the fact O'Keefe was clearly misleading people through his investigation? hmm
Originally posted by Southern Guardian
reply to post by beezzer
Why not simply tell us the merits here? In this thread? Considering that the excuses of O'Keefe's actions so far have been that these supposed merits outweigh the fact he lied and mislead people.
If you really don't have much in the way of merit to show for his investigation then simply admit it.
A preliminary probe of now-disbanded community organizing group ACORN has found no sign the group or related organizations mishandled the $40 million in federal money they received in recent years, congressional investigators reported Monday.
A review of grants by nine federal agencies, mostly for housing issues, found problems with only one award -- and in that case, the separately administered ACORN Housing Corporation quickly provided a missing piece of documentation, the Government Accountability Office reported.
Following the publication of the videos and withdrawal of funding, four different independent investigations by various state and city Attorneys General and the GAO released in 2009 and 2010 cleared ACORN, finding its employees had not engaged in criminal activities and that the organization had managed its federal funding appropriately, and calling the videos deceptively and selectively edited to present the workers in the worst possible light.
ACORN has conducted large-scale voter registration drives since at least the 1980s, focusing primarily on registering poor and minority citizens. During the 2008 election season, ACORN gathered over 1.3 million voter registration forms in 21 states. Some of these registration forms were flagged by ACORN's internal auditors for review by election officials. It was estimated by Project Vote that 400,000 registrations collected by ACORN were ultimately rejected, the vast majority for being duplicate registrations submitted by citizens (which is also common at government voter registration services according to reports on the National Voter Registration Act by the U.S. Election Assistance Commission). An unknown number of registrations were fraudulent, but Project Vote estimated that only a few percent were, based on past years and samples from some drives in 2008. No official in states where voter registration drives were conducted have come forward with substantial numbers of fraudulent registrations. It was estimated by Project Vote that 450,000 of the registrations collected by ACORN represented first-time voters, while the remainder were address changes submitted by citizens updating their addresses.
Originally posted by Southern Guardian
reply to post by OptimusSubprime
ACORN is a money laundering menace to civil society.
And what sources, aside from evidently biased websites, can you cite for this? Because this is another accusation I've heard against this organization, and quick search to the source of these accusations always end up on rightwing blogs and websites. "Suspicious activity" isn't absolute proof of guilt, sorry.
As soon as O’Keefe and his partner-in-crime left the ACORN location, Mr. Vera called the police to report the entire incident. It turns out that Vera had been playing along with O’Keefe in an effort to ensnare O’Keefe and Giles whom Vera believed were in the act of breaking the law by proposing to engage in the importing of young women to become prostitutes.
O’Keefe and Giles received immunity from prosecution in exchange for providing the
full, unedited videotapes. As a result, we did not determine if they violated California’s
Invasion of Privacy Act when they recorded the ACORN employees. If the
circumstances meet the requirements of the Act, the ACORN employees may be able to
bring a private suit against O’Keefe and Giles for recording a confidential conversation
without consent.
Originally posted by seeker1963
reply to post by Southern Guardian
And again, where in the OP did I mention voter fraud in 2008? This thread is about O'Keefe smearing ACORN, it is not about the voter fraud committed by individual acorn staff back in 2008, so stop derailing the thread.
If the only thing you can point negatively against ACORN is the 2008 voter fraud committed by individual staff members, then this once again demonstrates that alot of other accusations hold little to no substance.
Why the deflection OP? More importantly, why are you defending an organization who committed voting fraud? Do we not as a society have the attitude that once a criminal always a criminal? Better yet!! Would you defend a right wing organization who committed voter fraud and got CAUGHT?
But in this case, you are defending an organization that WAS proven in a court to be violating the law! You are so blinded by partisan politics that you can't even see your own nose in front of your face........
Why do you want to make a thread about Strategic Allied Consulting?
But Acorn, unlike Strategic Allied Consulting, actually self-reported its canvassers' suspicious applications -- which it was legally obligated to submit nonetheless. The ones from Sproul's groups, on the other hand, were spotted by election officials.t