It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
It was a month before the girls were returned to their parents, after a Maricopa County Superior Court judge ruled the photographs were in fact harmless and a medical exam revealed no signs of sexual abuse.
Originally posted by Creep Thumper
People shouldn't be taking naked pictures of their children in the first place.
Originally posted by Thurisaz
reply to post by ollncasino
pathetic really when you consider the amount of reports that are sent in of real pedos and nothing is done.
Originally posted by Superhans
Originally posted by Thurisaz
reply to post by ollncasino
pathetic really when you consider the amount of reports that are sent in of real pedos and nothing is done.
Exactly how many are sent in that nothing is done about?
Originally posted by SpaceJockey1
On another note, it always surprises me that often when I watch Americas Funniest Videos, there are numerous clips of naked children (often peeing accidents) that even though they have been blurred for TV, the originals must be pretty explicit....strange but I never seem to hear anyone going on about those clips?
Not only that but based on today's overly PC world, there are plenty that would appear to border on child abuse / endangerment.
For that matter, it won't be long before someone decides to go through Youtube clips, as there are no doubt plenty of similar like to AFV ther, and have those removed...
Originally posted by Wide-Eyes
The fact that they had a 'medical exam' is most disturbing to me...
I assume you have no children of your own. Only people with no kids could be suspicious of pics like that.
Originally posted by shapur
reply to post by ollncasino
I have heard from a friend of mine that there are some sites which expose children and they make tons of money by selling the pictures and movies to their clients!...You cant blame people to be a little suspicious of nude kiddy pictures.
Oh be quiet. You haven't seen the pictures either, idiot. But the judge has, and deemed them innocent. But you know more than a judge, right?
Originally posted by Char-Lee
Originally posted by wingsfan
Just when you think you finally seen it all in another thread, then you get this. What flipping planet does someone come from that doesn't know about these types of family photos? We can assume the wal-mart worker was of suspect IQ, that goes without saying, but law enforcement actual carrying out medical exams for abuse? And then putting them on the registry?
All involved should be sued to hell in back, then sued again for ruining our country with this endless insanity.
When did YOU see the photos in question? Now all of you are judging the worker and her bosses and the child protective persons all in the wrong and YOU never saw the photos in question!
Again, you obviously don't have kids , or you wouldn't be making such a ridiculous observation. I'm guessing you're about 14.
Originally posted by Creep Thumper
People shouldn't be taking naked photos of their kids. It's weird.
What is the purpose? A picture with their clothes on isn't good enough?