It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
A Walmart employee, unhappy over the content of several bath time pictures, contacted bosses with concerns that they may have been images of child pornography.
Instead of receiving a batch of happy memories of a fun family outing, the couple were reported to the police and their children were placed into the care of the Arizona Child Protective Services Agency.
It was a month before the girls were returned to their parents, after a Maricopa County Superior Court judge ruled the photographs were in fact harmless and a medical exam revealed no signs of sexual abuse.
Daily Mail
Originally posted by marbles87
They put them on a sex offender list and all the people want is 75 large. If I was them I would be taking Walmart for everything.
It was a month before the girls were returned to their parents, after a Maricopa County Superior Court judge ruled the photographs were in fact harmless and a medical exam revealed no signs of sexual abuse.
Originally posted by shapur
reply to post by ollncasino
I have heard from a friend of mine that there are some sites which expose children and they make tons of money by selling the pictures and movies to their clients!...You cant blame people to be a little suspicious of nude kiddy pictures.
Originally posted by ollncasino
An Arizona couple are suing Walmart after they developed their vacation snaps & wrongly decided that some were of a pedophilic nature and reported them to the police. The couple lost custody of their 3 daughters for a month and their names went on a central sex offenders.
A Walmart employee, unhappy over the content of several bath time pictures, contacted bosses with concerns that they may have been images of child pornography.
Instead of receiving a batch of happy memories of a fun family outing, the couple were reported to the police and their children were placed into the care of the Arizona Child Protective Services Agency.
It was a month before the girls were returned to their parents, after a Maricopa County Superior Court judge ruled the photographs were in fact harmless and a medical exam revealed no signs of sexual abuse.
Daily Mail
The story is also reported here ABC News
The photos were simple childhood nudity taken on holiday. In particular a number were bath time photos and three were of the girls lying on a towel naked with their arms around each other. The Walmart employees decided that these were pornographic in some sense.
The couple are suing Walmart for damages and to recover $75,000 in legal fees they incurred defending themselves.
Apparently you can't take pictures of your own children in the bath anymore without running the danger of Child Protection Services seizing your kids and putting your name on a sex offenders register.
edit on 9-3-2013 by ollncasino because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by RadicalRebel
Originally posted by shapur
reply to post by ollncasino
I have heard from a friend of mine that there are some sites which expose children and they make tons of money by selling the pictures and movies to their clients!...You cant blame people to be a little suspicious of nude kiddy pictures.
You need to shut your mouth.
This incident went far beyond a "little" suspicion.
Maybe if these state authorities had done a little investigating before traumatizing these kids i could understand your argument, but as it stands...forget it, you obviously dont understand what your defending...
Originally posted by ollncasino
Originally posted by marbles87
They put them on a sex offender list and all the people want is 75 large. If I was them I would be taking Walmart for everything.
What is wrong and deeply worrying is that parent are presumed guilty until proven innocent.
Their 3 daughter were seized and they were put on a sex offenders register on the basis of bath time snaps. They then had to spend $75,000 getting their daughters back and clearing their name.
Walmart is to blame but so is the Child Protection agency that seized the girls on the basis of bath time snaps. Deeply worrying.
edit on 9-3-2013 by ollncasino because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Char-Lee
You don't assume anything... you protect the kids. Have you seen the evidence.
Originally posted by Wifibrains
reply to post by ollncasino
It was a month before the girls were returned to their parents, after a Maricopa County Superior Court judge ruled the photographs were in fact harmless and a medical exam revealed no signs of sexual abuse.
Unbelievable! The state intruded and molested the children to be sure they were not molested.
Originally posted by Char-Lee
You don't assume anything... you protect the kids. Have you seen the evidence.
You don't assume anything... you protect the kids.