Maybe they don't but why the free samples and what not. They put their name to every prescription they prescribe. I dunno, do the drug stores throw
those in the trash when their done?
The free samples are for the benefit of the patients who can't afford the medications that they need, or for medications that aren't covered by their
insurances. Sometimes it is a better option then prescribing a generic.
Prescriptions are filled, and then logged into a database. The prescription must be tied to a physician; having the prescribing physicians name makes
it easy to authenticate, if the physician did not write the prescription it could be proven to be a forgery which is punishable by up to 5 years in
prison. If a prescription is called in, then the pharmacy needs many pieces of information, and sometimes a physician authentication number.
Just like the three consecutive doctors who have felt G's soft prostate since his diagnosis when it was hard and can't tell him at all "good job,"
"what did you do?" "keep up the good work," not one congratulations on saving your own life. Not one mention what did you do, they didn't want to hear
it. The 3rd doctor, who G never told he had been diagnosed with cancer after checking him out for infection, had the nerve to tell him directly to his
face that he didn't beat cancer after we asked him about the cancer and he said,"what cancer?" with a shocked face. We knew at that moment there was
no obvious signs of cancer and this was nearly six months after he cured himself. The doc left the office mad and came back in moments later with his
medical records from the other hospital and straight up told him to his face he didn't beat cancer. That was your caring doctor right there!
You're generalizing an entire profession based off of 3 individuals? Do you think that is fair? Imagine if an alien race visited 3 murderers? Would
they judge our entire species off of those 3 people? Is that fair?
Regardless, the last doctor was probably more annoyed that you lied about the patients history rather then the alternative treatment.
Ahh, here we go...the God-given natural plants of the earth are the bad guys now. lol. Good one.
I'm actually saying the exact opposite. Many chemical substances used in medications have been derived from plants. Do you know how many plants you
would need to consume to get the necessary levels in the body in these instances? How much of the consumed amount would be destroyed by the bodies
stomach acids? You might as eat an entire crop a day! Or you could just take a pill with the necessary extracts in a more effective carrier.
His most recent levels are lower than they were, but he is still having problems with enlargement, but how many men over the age of 70 aren't? And,
his prostate is still soft at his most recent physical two weeks ago. He still had no problems with pain either. Face it Doc, he cured himself without
a doctor...it is amazing isn't it?
Did he have a second biopsy? With a Gleason score of 7 I would be adamant about my loved one having a second biopsy to "confirm" your belief that he
has been cured. Having a needle biopsy is a much more accurate test then any subjective palpation testing. I know the testing isn't pleasant, but it
would make him and his family feel better.
This cure plan takes three weeks...just three weeks. What does someone have to lose if they already being told they are going to die? I recommend that
a person keep with the plans of whatever traditional route they take, but take the time first for this plan...just three weeks and see what happens,
it'll blow your minds. Accept it Doc!
The fact that you continuously call this a cure is mind blowing to me. You have no proof of a cure!
Also, if a person had an aggressive form of cancer, and they chose your route over traditional medications/treatment, then they could lose time. Time
they could spend with their loved ones, time the py could use to make peace with friends and family, time to see a wedding/birth/graduation, time
they could have stopped a cancer from metastasizing !
Throughout this thread you have referred to traditional medications as poisons, and the basis behind your entire cure is detoxification of the body.
So using logic wouldn't that defeat the purpose or your proposed "cure"? You've contradicted yourself.
You have done an excellent job improving your FILs health. You have not provided a cure for cancer. If you have cured cancer please provide us all
with the medical treatment plan that was done, as well as the biopsy report pre diet and the post diet biopsy showing that he was "cured".
Note: as stated previously, I am a medical student, please don't address me as doc until I have earned that rite.
Note 2: I saw where you believe that doctors receive a "kick back" from drug companies to prescribe their product. This has never been the case for
my grandfather (started practicing medicine in the 1960s), nor my father (who started practicing medicine in the early 90s). You just assume these
things are true without any verification or validation.
Note 3: my family has cared for close to 6 generations of people. My family runs a tight office, and we care about each and every patient. We answer
every single phone call that comes in, even after normal business hours. You don't know every doctor, nor the internal workings of the health care
Stop making bogus accusations
edit on 22-2-2014 by EnderMEM because: (no reason given)