It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The ship's roles are to:
•embark, transport and deploy an embarked force (Army in the case of the ADF but could equally be an allied Army or Marines), along with their equipment and aviation units, and
•carry out/support humanitarian missions.
Therefore the requirement is for a multipurpose ship able to operate in both these roles, but not necessarily simultaneously, owing to the differing configuration requirements.
The first LHD, named HMAS Canberra, is due to be commissioned in January 2014 and the second ship, HMAS Adelaide, is planned to commission in June 2015.
Originally posted by 74Templar
reply to post by Anonbeleiver77
HMAS Canberra
One of two LHD (Landing Helicopter Dock) the Australian Navy will have in service by 2015.
The ship's roles are to:
•embark, transport and deploy an embarked force (Army in the case of the ADF but could equally be an allied Army or Marines), along with their equipment and aviation units, and
•carry out/support humanitarian missions.
Therefore the requirement is for a multipurpose ship able to operate in both these roles, but not necessarily simultaneously, owing to the differing configuration requirements.
The first LHD, named HMAS Canberra, is due to be commissioned in January 2014 and the second ship, HMAS Adelaide, is planned to commission in June 2015.
There are no plans to place F35s on the LHDs, as the F35s we are receiving are the F35A, not the VSTOL F35B. The idea is to use the NH90, a combined Army/Navy heavy transport helicopter that replaced the Sea King HS1s, and the SH60s and whatever they use to replace them, which I think is the HH60 Romeo (I could be wrong about that one though). I think the idea is more rapid response to the island nations under our protection, such as Fiji and the Solomons, rather than a projected force. A true carrier would do no good for Australia, there's just too much coastline to protect to justify having a fixed-wing naval air wing like the US does. The Australian military's main goal always seem to be peacekeeping and home defense.
not to mention Australia has been involved in MOST wars if not all that the UK and the US have had. Even Vietnam, Korea, EVERYWHERE.
Originally posted by 74Templar
reply to post by Anonbeleiver77
Mind you, I'd love to see a pic of it sitting in the Williamstown docks right now.
As far as I know they are based on a Spanish design Juan Carlos I, and the Spanish Navy uses Sea Harriers from their decks, so that would explain the ramp, as its intention is to utilise V/STOL fixed wing aircraft. The F35B would certainly be able to operate from them, but Australia has no plans for anything other than F35As, which are the basic fixed wing version. The F35B has the central fan, allowing it to take off and land vertically, and the F35C is the navalised version the US Navy is looking at. The only other thing I have heard is they plan to use remote drones from the decks also, so the ramp would be useful for them also.
Basically the LHD is meant to be a floating can of whoopass, complete with vehicles, helicopters and troops that can go anywhere quickly and lend additional support to countries that need it. I can't see them trekking off to the Middle East anytime soon.
As for us and the U.S, We were allies in previous wars. It's only logical that we aide each other now as we did in the past.
Originally posted by tadaman
reply to post by Thecakeisalie
As for us and the U.S, We were allies in previous wars. It's only logical that we aide each other now as we did in the past.
yeah, I agree.....like if Australia was faced with a defense threat and /or need of resource acquisition, we would help as well.
edit on 8-3-2013 by tadaman because: (no reason given)