posted on Mar, 9 2013 @ 02:17 AM
All I'm seeing here is a LOT of people drinking Kool-Aid...
The 'photos' in NO WAY support ANY of the rampant speculation as to exactly what this site supposedly represents.
You would think with this much specu-'Science' there would be more than a single photo being offered in this 'article'.
The single photo being offered doesn't really support much of anything.
It doesn't look like a controlled dig in any way, shape, form or manner. (Note the half rib cage. ).
Further, the positioning of the skeleton strongly suggests some form of innundation.
If anyone has any more info or links to other photos of the skeletons, it would be much appreciated.
The kind of nonsense being floated here strongly reminds me of the 'support' for Darwin's 'Theory of Evolution' supposedly existing in the
anthropological record... When in reality, it's something like three divergent points of data.
With a whole lot of Imagineering between the points.