Possible Developments for next The 'Big One' SoCal on San Andreas Fault Line!

page: 2
24
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join

posted on Mar, 11 2013 @ 12:10 PM
link   
Magnitude 5.2
Date-Time

Monday, March 11, 2013 at 16:55:42 UTC
Monday, March 11, 2013 at 09:55:42 AM at epicenter

Location 33.506°N, 116.476°W
Depth 0.1 km (~0.1 mile) (poorly constrained)
Region SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
Distances

19 km (12 miles) ESE (107°) from Anza, CA
25 km (16 miles) SW (221°) from La Quinta, CA
26 km (16 miles) SSW (202°) from Palm Desert, CA
36 km (22 miles) S (172°) from Palm Springs, CA
102 km (63 miles) NE (38°) from San Diego, CA

earthquake.usgs.gov...

Possibility stronger to come in S California ..

R-M




posted on Mar, 11 2013 @ 12:14 PM
link   
reply to post by MariaLida
 


Felt it a little out here in San Diego, heard the windows rattle.

I'm in north county Escondido



posted on Mar, 11 2013 @ 12:15 PM
link   
Im here in Downtown LA and i definitely felt something. My desk lamp shook. It was more a swaying movement.



posted on Mar, 11 2013 @ 12:25 PM
link   

Originally posted by MariaLida
Magnitude 5.2
Date-Time

Monday, March 11, 2013 at 16:55:42 UTC
Monday, March 11, 2013 at 09:55:42 AM at epicenter

Location 33.506°N, 116.476°W
Depth 0.1 km (~0.1 mile) (poorly constrained)
Region SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
Distances

19 km (12 miles) ESE (107°) from Anza, CA
25 km (16 miles) SW (221°) from La Quinta, CA
26 km (16 miles) SSW (202°) from Palm Desert, CA
36 km (22 miles) S (172°) from Palm Springs, CA
102 km (63 miles) NE (38°) from San Diego, CA

earthquake.usgs.gov...

Possibility stronger to come in S California ..

R-M


Of Course........downgraded to

Magnitude 4.7
Date-Time

Monday, March 11, 2013 at 16:55:42 UTC
Monday, March 11, 2013 at 09:55:42 AM at epicenter

Location 33.506°N, 116.476°W
Depth 0.1 km (~0.1 mile) (poorly constrained)
Region SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
Distances

19 km (12 miles) ESE (107°) from Anza, CA
25 km (16 miles) SW (221°) from La Quinta, CA
26 km (16 miles) SSW (202°) from Palm Desert, CA
36 km (22 miles) S (172°) from Palm Springs, CA
102 km (63 miles) NE (38°) from San Diego, CA



posted on Mar, 11 2013 @ 12:30 PM
link   
However just today this new swarm. Lots of small ones

1.2 21km SW of La Quinta, California 2013-03-11 17:26:21 33.507°N 116.444°W 7.9
1.6 20km ESE of Anza, California 2013-03-11 17:26:05 33.516°N 116.454°W 13.4
1.4 20km ESE of Anza, California 2013-03-11 17:25:39 33.515°N 116.463°W 12.3
1.7 3km S of Winchester, California 2013-03-11 17:24:41 33.675°N 117.083°W 0.2
2.0 19km ESE of Anza, California 2013-03-11 17:23:51 33.510°N 116.468°W 11.2
2.0 13km SSW of Cathedral City, California 2013-03-11 17:23:34 33.676°N 116.546°W 2.4
1.6 20km ESE of Anza, California 2013-03-11 17:22:59 33.511°N 116.460°W 14.2
2.0 19km ESE of Anza, California 2013-03-11 17:22:06 33.507°N 116.472°W 9.4
2.0 20km SW of La Quinta, California 2013-03-11 17:21:54 33.519°N 116.450°W 14.9
1.4 20km ESE of Anza, California 2013-03-11 17:21:30 33.505°N 116.460°W 11.4
2.0 20km ESE of Anza, California 2013-03-11 17:19:30 33.509°N 116.466°W 12.4
2.0 21km SW of La Quinta, California 2013-03-11 17:19:03 33.505°N 116.445°W 8.7
2.0 20km ESE of Anza, California 2013-03-11 17:18:37 33.507°N 116.456°W 10.0
1.4 21km SW of La Quinta, California 2013-03-11 17:17:01 33.501°N 116.445°W 12.0
1.4 9km ESE of Aguanga, California 2013-03-11 17:15:07 33.410°N 116.768°W 11.0
1.5 11km SSE of Aguanga, California 2013-03-11 17:14:57 33.350°N 116.817°W 7.0
1.6 22km SSW of La Quinta, California 2013-03-11 17:14:27 33.480°N 116.427°W 11.3
1.5 20km ESE of Anza, California 2013-03-11 17:14:14 33.507°N 116.461°W 8.7
1.5 20km ESE of Anza, California 2013-03-11 17:13:53 33.508°N 116.459°W 13.4
2.3 21km SW of La Quinta, California 2013-03-11 17:13:17 33.509°N 116.450°W 8.7
2.4 16km SW of La Quinta, California 2013-03-11 17:13:12 33.558°N 116.429°W 24.3
2.2 18km SW of La Quinta, California 2013-03-11 17:12:53 33.525°N 116.428°W 9.3
1.7 20km ESE of Anza, California 2013-03-11 17:12:44 33.506°N 116.457°W 11.8
1.8 19km SW of La Quinta, California 2013-03-11 17:12:31 33.523°N 116.431°W 8.0
2.0 21km ESE of Anza, California 2013-03-11 17:12:09 33.498°N 116.448°W 11.8
2.1 20km ESE of Anza, California 2013-03-11 17:11:16 33.503°N 116.463°W 11.0
2.2 17km SW of La Quinta, California 2013-03-11 17:11:07 33.532°N 116.418°W 21.9
1.8 20km ESE of Anza, California 2013-03-11 17:10:50 33.499°N 116.460°W 7.5
1.8 15km S of Borrego Springs, California 2013-03-11 17:10:26 33.117°N 116.406°W 7.0
1.9 19km SW of La Quinta, California 2013-03-11 17:10:16 33.526°N 116.440°W 11.0
1.9 20km ESE of Anza, California 2013-03-11 17:09:55 33.514°N 116.461°W 12.4
2.0 19km SW of La Quinta, California 2013-03-11 17:08:54 33.522°N 116.440°W 9.0
2.4 19km ESE of Anza, California 2013-03-11 17:08:01 33.512°N 116.466°W 12.2
2.0 21km SW of La Quinta, California 2013-03-11 17:07:28 33.508°N 116.446°W 11.6
2.1 13km W of Oasis, California 2013-03-11 17:07:09 33.464°N 116.245°W 16.9
2.3 9km ESE of Mecca, California 2013-03-11 17:07:01 33.529°N 115.986°W 8.2
1.3 20km ESE of Anza, California 2013-03-11 17:06:57 33.515°N 116.456°W 16.3
1.6 18km ESE of Anza, California 2013-03-11 17:06:31 33.484°N 116.495°W 0.9
1.7 20km SW of La Quinta, California 2013-03-11 17:06:23 33.514°N 116.448°W 14.1
2.0 7km ESE of Aguanga, California 2013-03-11 17:05:32 33.414°N 116.792°W 39.7
1.5 20km SW of La Quinta, California 2013-03-11 17:05:11 33.514°N 116.446°W 13.9
1.5 20km ESE of Anza, California 2013-03-11 17:04:23 33.515°N 116.454°W 12.6
1.8 21km ESE of Anza, California 2013-03-11 17:03:31 33.504°N 116.454°W 12.9
1.9 8km SSW of Cathedral City, California 2013-03-11 17:02:40 33.712°N 116.507°W 19.2
2.0 21km ESE of Anza, California 2013-03-11 17:01:32 33.491°N 116.458°W 9.8
2.1 20km ESE of Anza, California 2013-03-11 17:00:43 33.505°N 116.458°W 10.2
2.4 19km SW of La Quinta, California 2013-03-11 17:00:12 33.527°N 116.437°W 11.5
1.0 19km ESE of Anza, California 2013-03-11 16:58:30 33.512°N 116.475°W 12.6
4.6 20km SW of La Quinta, California 2013-03-11 16:56:06 33.523°N 116.461°W 12.6
4.7 20km ESE of Anza, California 2013-03-11 16:55:50 33.503°N 116.457°W 12.1
4.7 19km ESE of Anza, California 2013-03-11 16:55:42 33.506°N 116.476°W 0.1
1.1 21km SW of La Quinta, California 2013-03-11 16:54:55 33.507°N 116.454°W 11.3
1.2 21km SW of La Quinta, California 2013-03-11 16:54:48 33.508°N 116.452°W 10.1
1.3 21km SW of La Quinta, California 2013-03-11 16:54:20 33.504°N 116.448°W 14.0
1.3 21km ESE of Anza, California 2013-03-11 16:54:02 33.499°N 116.451°W 9.3
1.5 21km SW of La Quinta, California 2013-03-11 16:51:47 33.513°N 116.451°W 14.6
1.9 20km ESE of Anza, California 2013-03-11 16:51:25 33.507°N 116.455°W 13.2
2.3 20km ESE of Anza, California 2013-03-11 16:51:09 33.503°N 116.460°W 9.1
2.3 21km ESE of Anza, California 2013-03-11 16:50:52 33.499°N 116.456°W 9.2
1.1 13km ESE of Idyllwild-Pine Cove, California 2013-03-11 16:43:13 33.698°N 116.587°W 27.8
1.2 21km SW of La Quinta, California 2013-03-11 16:39:02 33.504°N 116.451°W 9.3
1.6 21km ESE of Anza, California 2013-03-11 16:37:27 33.499°N 116.452°W 10.0
2.7 19km ESE of Anza, California 2013-03-11 16:36:



posted on Mar, 11 2013 @ 12:54 PM
link   

Originally posted by Observationalist
reply to post by MariaLida
 


Felt it a little out here in San Diego, heard the windows rattle.

I'm in north county Escondido


Hope it will calm down and nothing stronger will come, we will see how situation will developed ..

Stay safe friend, anyway hard time for SoCal and this fault line ..

www.abovetopsecret.com...








edit on 11-3-2013 by MariaLida because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 11 2013 @ 01:33 PM
link   
An earthquake with a preliminary magnitude of 5.1 has shaken a wide area of Southern California.
11.03.2013










posted on Mar, 11 2013 @ 02:27 PM
link   
I'm impressed with your thread, information and certainly the timing!

My concern for this current swarm near the Sultan lake is the pattern. There seem to be numerous events, over a wide-spread area with various depths. So not your typical forshock, main and aftershock scenario. My impression is of an area breaking up.

Hoping this not the very pre-cursor you were talking about the past day or so, but man...it could be.



posted on Mar, 11 2013 @ 02:28 PM
link   



posted on Mar, 11 2013 @ 02:33 PM
link   
Isnt this how the movie Volcanoe started?

The quake swarms in cali have been a big concern for me after that whole solomons island thing.



posted on Mar, 11 2013 @ 03:24 PM
link   
reply to post by MariaLida
 


I don't know how you do it.... I guess it really doesn't matter how. Its a fact you can.


I do hope your feeling or "how to" is not accurate to a point of the BIG ONE coming, as these appear to be foreshocks.



posted on Mar, 11 2013 @ 03:41 PM
link   

Originally posted by westcoast
I'm impressed with your thread, information and certainly the timing!

My concern for this current swarm near the Sultan lake is the pattern. There seem to be numerous events, over a wide-spread area with various depths. So not your typical forshock, main and aftershock scenario. My impression is of an area breaking up.

Hoping this not the very pre-cursor you were talking about the past day or so, but man...it could be.



Hoping to0 friends, this EQ was around M 5.0 ..

Probably need stronger EQ - foreshock to locked area start to collapse-rupture but we will see in next days will this EQ make any reaction on fault line sometimes power is not that important like location is of foreshock etc ..

Also probably we will have more action in SoCal what we can expect after this one is hard to say, but next sign will be if in next days hit around M 6.2 (from around Mexcali to Parkfield area) on this fault line, then time is very close and need to be on greatest alert in 48 hrs or 72 hrs after that EQ ..

Anyway if "Big One" probably around M 7.4 don't hit after possible foreshock around M 6.2 in next dangerous days, then I'm positive in high % that will hit very soon after next EQ-foreshock around M 6.2 on posted location ..

Hope it is more simple now, so that's how I see things ..

Also hope this is and will be helpful for this area in future ..

R-M



posted on Mar, 11 2013 @ 04:04 PM
link   

Originally posted by MamaJ
reply to post by MariaLida
 


I don't know how you do it.... I guess it really doesn't matter how. Its a fact you can.


I do hope your feeling or "how to" is not accurate to a point of the BIG ONE coming, as these appear to be foreshocks.


Hope too, we will see soon and how situation will develop after this M 5.0 on fault line and all this aftershocks ..

earthquake.usgs.gov...

It's better for you if you don't know
believe me mo0m I can not even start to explain, also thx for your support in last 2 years ..

I'm only very disappointing how much people without clue writing about EQ and prediction end lead people in wrong way very wrong way for not-human purpose or how advertisement only their sites and youtube channels ..
edit on 11-3-2013 by MariaLida because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 11 2013 @ 04:12 PM
link   
reply to post by MariaLida
 


You are so welcome! Don't worry about what other people do... you just do what is right and thats what really matters.

Im glad you are able to figure things out in the EQ world and I cannot begin to understand how difficult it is putting it all together. Putting yourself out here like you have done time and time again takes a lot of guts. Of course there will always be those who try to discount your good intent efforts. Again, don't worry about those people, just concentrate on helping and everything will work out the way it is suppose to.... especially for you.


You have a big heart! I appreciate your efforts.

Do you see these earthquakes as being after shocks or foreshocks? Is there a way to tell? They do not appear to be your typical aftershock sequence nor are they localized.



posted on Mar, 11 2013 @ 04:45 PM
link   
DUDE or DUDETTE


You have come through once again.

You have scored a 12 out of ten on my personal impressme meter!!

Keep up the good work, and continue to update us quakers on this site of any future hot spots.

Heck.......! If you keep this up, we are going to see you on David Letterman sooner then later.


The sheer number of of quakes after the 4.7 is staggering! (100-200).

earthquake.usgs.gov...

My question or concern is.....where are the 3-3.5's

edit on 11-3-2013 by radpetey because: (no reason given)
edit on 11-3-2013 by radpetey because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 11 2013 @ 04:50 PM
link   
Top left hand side of Drudge. Drudge

One of the stories is saying Residents Urged To Prep For ‘Two Weeks On Your Own’ On Quake Anny This a just inc case article but when some on high alter because of today's EQ the timing seems odd.



posted on Mar, 11 2013 @ 05:23 PM
link   

Originally posted by MariaLida
We have many information that next 'Big One' at San Andreas fault coming in next years or even soon ..

This information coming from scientist and geo-seismic experts also from some ..

You all know how is difficult to predict 'Big One' for this area because fault line did not rupture more of 100 years for San Francisco area, 155 for Los Angeles to Parkfield area and 330 years for Mexicali to L.A area ..

This section of the fault from L.A. to San San Francisco has an earthquake-recurrence interval of roughly 140–160 years ..

At the time the population of Los Angeles was about 4,000, today Southern California is home to 23 million people and the fastest growing areas are near the San Andreas and other major faults also ..

If you look through historical available information this suggests that the big rapture sequence from south to north of San Andreas fault line because of movement Pacific Plate and the North American Plate in right-lateral strike-slip (horizontal motion) also time from last big EQ's on San Andreas fault line ..

So 'Big One' probably will be at area of around Mexicali to L.A. but not necessarily, also think is important to put maximum information about this "events" ..

Like I say is very hard to predict next exact time for 'Big One' here but think is possible developments for this events will be in many sings before EQ and then will not be a lost time, I spend years to understood what can helpful or useful..

I will put one of most important things how i see possible situation development and about foreshocks that can lead to 'Big One' ..

Think this can help a lot so people in this areas to have time to prepare mentally and physically in hours advance before 'Big One', think this time that period probably will be from 1 to 48 hrs or several days ..

So think very probably we will not have here 'Big One' suddenly, foreshocks will happen before and lead to big rupture and think most important EQ is area of central California around Parkfield area, EQ's in this area think over M 5.5+ and especially M 6.0+ can lead to 'Big One' in some 1-24 hrsd, EQ of M 6.0+ on San Andreas Fault Line! also can lead to 'Big One' in hrs advance ..

We had a similar situations but think now will happen like is described and will be nice if you put your opinion or similar, I will post more about this dangerous possible foreshocks and EQ's which can lead to next 'Big One' ..

I put some info only about time that come, 'Big One' is unfortunately inevitable and will come only is matter of time to release from long time this locked area ..


California, slip rates for faults range from 0 to about 38 mm/yr, though anything over 10 mm/yr is generally considered fast (a slip rate around 1 to 2 mm/yr might be considered average for a major, active fault).

The rate of slippage averages approximately 33 to 37 millimetres (1.3 to 1.5 in) annually across California


www.data.scec.org... ; en.wikipedia.org...


Geologists say an earthquake capable of causing widespread destruction is 99 percent certain of hitting California within the next 30 years.

Studies have said that a 7.8 magnitude quake could kill 1,800 people, injure 50,000 more and damage 300,000 buildings.


www.google.com...







Thank you R-M





MariaLidia I have a question for and not at all trying to be rude I'm just trying to figure out how you get your info? I notice you are new and I haven't seen any of your other posts yet. Do you work for an organization that has such info or something else?



posted on Mar, 11 2013 @ 05:57 PM
link   
reply to post by favouriteslave
 


No I don't work for any organization or similar also I'm in eartquekes all of my life so it's a lo0ng story

Also friend I'm not new
, people know me I use only some different names in past all other is a same ..
edit on 11-3-2013 by MariaLida because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 11 2013 @ 05:59 PM
link   

Originally posted by MariaLida
reply to post by favouriteslave
 


No I don't work for any organization or similar also I'm in eartquekes all of my life so it's long story ..

Also friend I'm not new
..


Sorry looking at your post count and registration date. I haven't followed the quakes too closely this year but people here seem to think you know your stuff and its comes to past indicating a good track record? That's why I asked.
edit on 11-3-2013 by favouriteslave because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 11 2013 @ 06:11 PM
link   
Good call on this Maria!
A question though, I claim no expertise but if the main 4.7 event today were a fore shock, wouldn't it
have been an isolated event? Like a "orphan" if you will.

Then after 48-72 hours, BLAMO!! a 6.5-8.5 (god forbid) strikes?

Seems as though this swarm is letting off pressure/tension slowly.





top topics
 
24
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join