It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by MildCat
Originally posted by chishuppu
I love stupid people with one track minds, its like you are willingly stupid or maybe you just don't understand what a sanction is, or you don't know what a sovereign country means.
I love the rent-a-mobs who come to the defense of anyone claiming to be under attack from the west.
Originally posted by chishuppu
1. NK can carry as many nuclear tests as it wants within its borders, the US carries tests all the time yet I don't see anyone raising an issue.
NK is not the same situation as anyone else, not even Iran. NK is still at war with SK, and thus any testing can only be seen as aggressive. Plus, it is a disgrace that this state is funding nuclear weapons whilst the vast majority of its people are in a worse state than many african countries.
Originally posted by chishuppu
2. Dennis Rodman opened a channel for the Western people to know NK, but the govt and media shunned it. Instead of dialogue you would rather listen to people tell you about someone than from the person themselves. Its a tactic to keep the status quo, by refusing to acknowledge the other as normal you can keep them as an enemy or in case of old USA, blacks as slaves.
Good for him. Jane Fonda tried that once, didn't go well for her either. We have tried dialogue, for the last 50 years and it has gone absolutely nowhere. Unlike Iran, which now looks like it will comply with the UN, albeit after a long time.
Originally posted by chishuppu
3. A Sanction is an aggressive act which indangers the livelyhood of NK people therefore is an act of war, US embargo on Japan in 1940s was an act of war, sanctions are an aggressive act of war. Nothing pisses you off worse than being sanctioned by countries freely doing what you are doing claiming they are for peace when their coalition is invading other people.
A sanction is a display of the worlds anger and disgust at a certain action. This is what you agree to submit to as a member of the UN. Feel free to leave the UN if hearing people complain at the skewed priorities surrounding quality of life for your citizens in comparison to the militarisation dreams.
Originally posted by chishuppu
4. Leave NK alone, people don't know what is going on in their own cities govt, yet are knee deep in NK business.
No.
Originally posted by chishuppu
almost forgot, what is the difference between a Israeli preemptive strike threat and NKs strike threat?edit on 7-3-2013 by chishuppu because: (no reason given)
There is no difference. Both are outragous and both should be responded with by sanctions and embargoes. Both of these states have shown a deep disrespect for the international community.
Next.
Scheduled for June
Originally posted by dizziedame
You can bet your bippy many eyes are trained on NK. And all are just waiting for the word to take action.
Our military is the best in the world.. We can take out a target easily if we want to and with little damage to the area or civilians.
Is this not true?
I would be very scared if I lived in NK.
The USA will not advertize what it's real plans are and I have no doubt we have all possibilities covered.
By the way, is it possible to be a hawk and a dove at the same time?
Originally posted by BoogieMan911
Is America, Japan, and South Korea OK with this?
I personally don't think the US or NATO would or could respond to a north Korean nuclear attack, with nuclear weapons
The USA probably has a starwars satellite sitting right over N Korea and a few Photon Torpedos
ready to go.
Originally posted by Gazrok
reply to post by cavtrooper7
Might as well change the stars while we're at it....
NK launching a preemptive strike would be like Un slitting his own throat, and he knows it.
This is just more whining, hoping someone will give him a pacifier, though he's gone too far, and probably doesn't realize it.
China signing off on (instead of vetoing) the latest resolutions should have been his first clue....