It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
If you want "the indescribable" to be your God, then you are free to see it in that way.
If you want something "imaginable" to be your God, then you are free to see it in that way.
Surah 112-Say: “He is Allah, the One and Unique; (1) Allah, Who is in need of none and of Whom all are in need; (2) He neither begot any nor was He begotten, (3) and none is comparable to Him.” (4)
Originally posted by 1PLA1
The op's presentation of the one as childish and tribalistic and the other as mature and compassionate creates an instant combative stance by the reader. His/her tone is dismissive and insulting.
Originally posted by BlueMule
Originally posted by 1PLA1
The op's presentation of the one as childish and tribalistic and the other as mature and compassionate creates an instant combative stance by the reader. His/her tone is dismissive and insulting.
Tribalistic? In my way of thinking, we are all one big happy tribe in the Kingdom of God. Despite the coincidentia oppositorum divisions, there is unity underneath. In my way of thinking no one is going to be tortured in hell for all eternity for not having the correct mainstream orthodox beliefs. God would be incomplete if even one person went to the orthodox idea of "hell".
Oh sure I don't have a very high opinion of fundamentalists. I don't hide it. So sue me.
But at least I consider them family.
The reverse isn't true. In mainstream orthodox exoteric thinking, there are really only two tribes of Humanity. There is a tribe of Holy elite that is going to Heaven and there is a demonized unholy tribe of the damned. Guess which one the fundamentalists in this thread would put me in.
That's the real elitism. That's the real tribalism.
edit on 9-3-2013 by BlueMule because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by 1PLA1
One sides with God or one doesn't.
The op's presentation of the one as childish and tribalistic and the other as mature and compassionate creates an instant combative stance by the reader. His/her tone is dismissive and insulting.
Originally posted by BlueMule
reply to post by logical7
I have a great deal of respect for the sufi tradition. Too bad that many muslims regard sufism as an unacceptable distortion of Islamic beliefs and way of life.
There was once a free-spirited
shepherd who possessed neither
money nor the desire for it. All he had
was a pure and kind heart, a heart that
beat with the love of his Lord. All day
long he wondegreen with his flock through pastures, plains, and fields,
singing and talking all the while to his
Beloved God: “Oh, dear Lord, where are You to whom I dedicate my life?
Oh God, for whom I live and
breathe, by whose grace I exist, I
would sacrifice my sheep for the
sight for You¦.” One day Musa ” the prophet Moses ”
was passing by a pasture on his way
to the city. He noticed the shepherd,
who was sitting by his flock with his
face tilted up to the sky, addressing
God: “Where are You so that I may sew Your clothes, mend Your socks,
and make Your bed? Where are You
so that I may comb Your hair and
kiss Your feet? Where are You so
that I may polish Your shoes and
bring You milk to drink?” Musa approached the shepherd and
asked him, “Whom are you talking to?” “To the One who has created us. The
One who is Lord over day and night,
earth and sky.” Musa became enraged with the
shepherd’s reply. “How dare you talk to God like that! What you are
saying is blasphemous. You should
stuff cotton in your mouth if you
cannot control your tongue. Then, at
least, no one would hear your
outrageous insulting words, which have poisoned the very
atmosphere. You must stop
speaking like that at once, lest the
Almighty punish the entire human
race for your sin!” The shepherd, who has arisen upon
recognizing the prophet, stood
shaken. With tears running down his
cheeks, he listened as Musa continued: “Is the Almighty God a mere human
being that He should wear shoes
and socks? Is He an unformed infant
in need of milk to make Him grow?
Of course not! God is complete in
Himself, needless of all! By speaking with the Lord as you have
done, you disgrace not only
yourself but all the rest of Gods
creatures. You are naught but a
deifier of religion and an enemy of
God. Go and ask for forgiveness, if you have any sense left!” The simple shepherd did not really
understand what he had said to God
that was so rude, or why the prophet
had called him an enemy. Yet he knew
that a prophet of God must know
better than anyone else. Barely able to contain his sobs, he told Musa, “You have set fire to my soul. From now
on my mouth is sealed!” With a deep sigh, he turned away from his flock
and walked toward the desert. Feeling proud that he had corrected a
wayward soul, Musa was continuing
on his way toward the city when the
Almighty addressed him: “Why did you come between Us and Our loyal servant? Why did
you separate the lover from the
Beloved? We have sent you so that
you could unite one to the other,
not break their ties.” Musa listened to the heavenly words in
awe and humility. “We did not create this world in order to profit from it; creation is for
the benefit of the creatures. We
have no need of praise or worship;
it is the worshipers who benefit
from it. Remember that in Love,
words are only the outer husk and mean nothing. We pay no heed to
the beauty of the phrase or the
composition of the sentence. We
look only at the inner condition of
the heart. In that way We know the
sincerity of Our creatures, even though their words may be artless.
For those who burn with Love have
burned their words as well.”
Originally posted by tovenar
Cataphatic exositors have some link to a direct, positive, experience of the Divine.
Anaphatic theologians have no link to any actual experience of the Divine; thus they deny that anyone ever did either.
Originally posted by BlueMule
reply to post by logical7
Thanks for your insights, isn't that a Rumi poem?
Yes a single person may have both. I keep saying, it's like how the Dao has both yin and yang to be complete, and so both kinds of theology are incomplete in-and-of-themselves. People need both to be enlightened.
Religious fundamentalists don't have both, because they are not comparativists or mystics. They have not be initiated into apophatic insight by the Holy Spirit.
Originally posted by logical7
Originally posted by BlueMule
reply to post by logical7
Thanks for your insights, isn't that a Rumi poem?
Yes a single person may have both. I keep saying, it's like how the Dao has both yin and yang to be complete, and so both kinds of theology are incomplete in-and-of-themselves. People need both to be enlightened.
Religious fundamentalists don't have both, because they are not comparativists or mystics. They have not be initiated into apophatic insight by the Holy Spirit.
I don't know if its a poem by Rumi.
I want to ask you, if God prefers mystics over others?
The story i posted shows otherwise.
I also don't know what you mean by fundamentalists. Do you mean the violent ones or just anyone who follows all fundamentals of their religion?
Originally posted by BlueMule
Originally posted by tovenar
Cataphatic exositors have some link to a direct, positive, experience of the Divine.
What's an exositor?
Experiences of the Divine come in more flavors than just positive. FYI
Anaphatic theologians have no link to any actual experience of the Divine; thus they deny that anyone ever did either.
I'm an apophatic theologian, mystic, and comparativist who has had actual experiences of the Divine, and I don't deny that anyone else ever did either. So I guess that makes me living proof that you are wrong.
edit on 10-3-2013 by BlueMule because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by tovenar
Originally posted by BlueMule
Originally posted by tovenar
Cataphatic exositors have some link to a direct, positive, experience of the Divine.
What's an exositor?
Experiences of the Divine come in more flavors than just positive. FYI
Anaphatic theologians have no link to any actual experience of the Divine; thus they deny that anyone ever did either.
I'm an apophatic theologian, mystic, and comparativist who has had actual experiences of the Divine, and I don't deny that anyone else ever did either. So I guess that makes me living proof that you are wrong.
edit on 10-3-2013 by BlueMule because: (no reason given)
Wow. Your knowledge is so air-tight that there's no room for additional information to get in.
Impressive. You certainly don't need anyone else's input. I'm surprised you even bothered to start a thread on this.
Just decided to help out the less-evolved, eh?
Or maybe just because you needed to demonstrate your superiority one more time; just to make sure it's still there.
.