If you dont stop pitching for AGW bullcrap I'm going to remove Alex Jones from my crosshairs and replace it with you
19) Advertising: You will not advertise or promote other discussion boards, chat systems, online communities or other websites on the Websites within posts, private messages, avatars and/or signatures without prior written permission from TAN. You will not choose a username that is the same as a website domain, subdomain, URL, organization, or business for which you are associated. Doing so will result in removal of your Post(s) and immediate termination of your account.
1) The climate change is real, and there is more to it than CO2 and 'global warming' - it is all extremes.
2) The entire solar system appears to be changing simultaneously.
3) The magnetic changes on earth began hundreds of years ago, and need to be tracked more effectively.
4) Weather modification appears to be implemented, and IMHO it is a zero-sum game.
Fact vs Opinion: The 'Weather Modification' segment contains many statements of my personal opinion on the negative aspects of the various applications. I have nothing but my humble opinion on those matters; humans survived this event before, and we can do it again now.
HAARP comments are meant to help focus our efforts to properly identify these various machines of modification. While auroral modulation has it's benefits, my negative comments about weather modification applies to HAARP as well
Originally posted by Phage
We cannot detect Solar flares on the far side of the Sun.
That is a CME. CMEs do not have a classification system.
He's making things up.edit on 3/5/2013 by Phage because: (no reason given)
but could we try to guess whether a CME on the backside is produced by a filament eruption or a flare? Also, can we estimate the size of a possible flare judging on how big or fast the CME looked on the backside?