It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by arpgme
I see many conspiracy theories here and people are usually talking about "balance" and saying "it is what it is". This is redundant nonsense. In the past, when people were suffering or conspiracy theories had evidence they'll just deny it or say "I got Faith" in whatever spiritual authority they believe to be protecting them. Now, we have these so-called "New" age people saying "it is what it is" and talking about "balance". It is the same old message, be apathetic and hope that things get better. Now, I guess they are not even afraid to admit that it is all about control anymore since the popular words for spirituality nowadays seems to be "accepting" and "surrendering" and then some deceptive explanation about how "surrendering is freedom". Remember what the book 1984 said, they will trick people into believing that "freedom is slavery".
If you are not AGAINST pain and suffering, then you are FOR it. There is no "middle path" to allow people to suffer for no reason at all shows your "enabling" and "apathy" - you are NOT enlightened! How are you enlightened when your Heart/Compassion is not even working properly? If you are not helping others while they suffer, don't be surprised when nobody helps when you are in the situation. Apathy seems to be contagious.
...
Originally posted by watchitburn
I will try to explain my point of view.
Saying you are for or against something, means nothing. Actions are what count.
Originally posted by watchitburn
Is not someone who is against suffering and does nothing, just as culpable as someone who is for suffering?
There are actually people on this planet who thrive on suffering, it gives them a strange kind of peace for lack of a better word. Should they be denied the comfort they find in their suffering?
Originally posted by watchitburn
As was previously explained, the need for suffering to know the good when you find it.
There are people who are so sheltered/oblivious/self-centered they just can't comprehend the idea of others suffering.
Originally posted by watchitburn
My point that all these examples encompass, is that there are far too many perspectives and circumstances involved that just for/against is entirely too narrow a concept to address the topic.
Originally posted by watchitburn
From my perspective you may as well be saying you are for or against electrons.
Originally posted by WanDash
After seeing so much injustice, pain, hurt, greed, etc...for so long...one tends to learn to tune-it-out...unless it meets a certain set of criteria.
Going to take another blue pill, now... Everything will be better in the morning.
Originally posted by arpgme
...So to be consistent, you'd have to feel the same way when it comes to your suffering and those you love, otherwise it is hypocritical and a lie that your feelings are "tuned out" - more like selective caring.