It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

I want to be a CHEMTRAIL DEBUNKER

page: 9
25
<< 6  7  8    10  11  12 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 4 2013 @ 01:36 PM
link   
reply to post by clairvoyantrose
 

Did you read the link?

Fibers found in the sores are usually wisps of cotton thread, probably coming from clothing or bandages.

www.mayoclinic.com...



Why are there fibers and red goop coming out of incurable lesions on her body?
Is she bandaging those lesions? Is she scratching them?
edit on 3/4/2013 by Phage because: (no reason given)




posted on Mar, 4 2013 @ 01:38 PM
link   
reply to post by clairvoyantrose
 


Where are these cases happening that you have personal experience of?



posted on Mar, 4 2013 @ 01:38 PM
link   
reply to post by Phage
 


I know you to be a HAARP man so I yeild the floor to you sir
thanks..................Painfulhead



posted on Mar, 4 2013 @ 01:39 PM
link   
debunk this!! contrails my a$$$, please dont let them fool you , chemtrails are very real where i live!!!





posted on Mar, 4 2013 @ 01:41 PM
link   
reply to post by bluestorm
 




debunk this!!

Ok.
Those are contrails. Persistent contrails to be precise.

From 1970:

The spreading out of jet contrails into extensive cirrus sheets is a familiar sight. Often, when persistent conditions exist from 25,000 to 40,000ft, several long contrails increase in number and gradually merge into an almost solid interlaced sheet.
journals.ametsoc.org...
edit on 3/4/2013 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 4 2013 @ 01:48 PM
link   
reply to post by Phage
 


As a HAARP expert Phage aren’t Chemtrail some how related to it? Not in fact but as part of a proposal.. I thought one of the louder documents supporting Chems came form HAARP tech paperwork. Maybe I’m way off
Back to you sir………Painfulhead



posted on Mar, 4 2013 @ 01:49 PM
link   
reply to post by Painfulhead
 




Not in fact but as part of a proposal..

Not in fact. Not in proposal.
Only in the minds of the HAARPies and "chemtrail" crowd.



posted on Mar, 4 2013 @ 01:51 PM
link   

Originally posted by bluestorm
debunk this!! contrails my a$$$, please dont let them fool you , chemtrails are very real where i live!!!


What is it that tells you those clouds were chemtrails and not contrails? they certainly look like contrails.



posted on Mar, 4 2013 @ 01:51 PM
link   
reply to post by Phage
 


love the short answers that don't realy help me.
thanks...............Painfulhead



posted on Mar, 4 2013 @ 01:51 PM
link   
reply to post by Phage
 


No, and No.

And morgellons research has PROVEN that they are NOT cotton fibers or fibers from Bandages.

Carnicom Research



posted on Mar, 4 2013 @ 01:54 PM
link   

Originally posted by neformore
reply to post by clairvoyantrose
 


Where are these cases happening that you have personal experience of?


British Columbia, Canada.
Mainly the Vancouver/heavily populated areas.

rense.com...



posted on Mar, 4 2013 @ 01:55 PM
link   
reply to post by Aloysius the Gaul
 


hey lets not go into that again. yes a photo is a photo.
did you see my post to you making the correction about airline vs. airfield and what where your thoughts?
good to see you sir........... Painfulhead



posted on Mar, 4 2013 @ 01:55 PM
link   
reply to post by Phage
 


Persistent contrails, LOL seriously i like that, funny stuff you come up with, explain why i dont ever have plane traffic above my house expect certain mornings that this happens out of the blue, again there is no cross country flight paths above my house, why are you in denial? persistent contrail haa



posted on Mar, 4 2013 @ 01:56 PM
link   
reply to post by bluestorm
 


Yea contrails TOTALLY puff out into soupy skies...

NOT.

Contrails follow quickly behind the plane and everybody and their grandmother knows that. Even here in Canada where it reaches -40 degrees without windchills and even THEN do the contrails dissipate behind the planes. Chemtrails on the other hand, do exactly what your picture shows. I'm on your side bud.



posted on Mar, 4 2013 @ 01:58 PM
link   
reply to post by clairvoyantrose
 

Carnicom?
Are you talking about the red wine test? Or something a bit more scientific?

www.aromadictionary.com...



edit on 3/4/2013 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 4 2013 @ 02:01 PM
link   

Originally posted by bluestorm
debunk this!! contrails my a$$$, please dont let them fool you , chemtrails are very real where i live!!!





Sorry. But seriously, you ought to look up a book on meteorololgy in your local library. You may learn something and find that normal weather and atmospheric conditions aren't quite as scary. Those pictures are classic example of contrails ......

(nice pictures though
)
edit on 4-3-2013 by AndyMayhew because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 4 2013 @ 02:03 PM
link   
reply to post by clairvoyantrose
 


Even here in Canada where it reaches -40 degrees without windchills and even THEN do the contrails dissipate behind the planes.
You know that the atmospheric conditions 6 miles above the surface aren't the same as those on the ground, right?

You know that it is humidity, not temperature that determines whether or not contrails persist, right?

No. I don't guess you do know these things because you've never bothered to investigate them.



posted on Mar, 4 2013 @ 02:06 PM
link   
reply to post by bluestorm
 


explain why i dont ever have plane traffic above my house expect certain mornings that this happens out of the blue,
Because planes at that altitude don't just jump out at you...unless they are producing contrails.


again there is no cross country flight paths above my house
I think you are mistaken.


Not in the US? Can you give us a rough idea of where you live? If not, I understand. But I do live in a place where there are very few high altitude flights. I very rarely see contrails, persistent or otherwise. And I never see "chemtrails".

edit on 3/4/2013 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 4 2013 @ 02:07 PM
link   

Originally posted by clairvoyantrose
reply to post by bluestorm
 


Yea contrails TOTALLY puff out into soupy skies...

NOT.

Contrails follow quickly behind the plane and everybody and their grandmother knows that.


I think you are trying to say that contrails dissipate quickly??

Well no, they do not. And they never have. And the only people who "know" it are chemtail believers who have no idea about teh atmosphere.

Contrails are crystals of water. And jsut as cloud can hang around for days so can contrails. there are studies of contrail persistance from the 1970's, and accounts of contrail cloud sheets covering the skies from WW2.

and there are no studies showing otherwise. This particular idea is an invention by believers somewhere because otherwise there is no reason to beleive in chemtrails at all - it was necessary to create this false idea for chemtrails to be able to be pushed on an unsuspecting public.

But even chemtrail guru Michael J Murphy (creator of the 2 WITWATS movies) has been forced to admit that contrails can persist in the face of a direct public question, rather than be caught on video supoprting the lie:




Even here in Canada where it reaches -40 degrees without windchills and even THEN do the contrails dissipate behind the planes.


Temperature is only part of the equation - you also need to know the humidity athe contrail altitude to be able to predict persistence, as per the chart I posted earlier in this thread.

So yes - even at -40C contrails can dissipate quickly or hang around for ages - depending on humidity with respect to ice.


Chemtrails on the other hand, do exactly what your picture shows. I'm on your side bud.


The side of ignorance is not a good side to be on.
edit on 4-3-2013 by Aloysius the Gaul because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 4 2013 @ 02:15 PM
link   

Originally posted by Painfulhead
reply to post by Aloysius the Gaul
 


hey lets not go into that again. yes a photo is a photo.


Suer - but the guy says the photos aer of chemtrails and not contrails.

they look like contrails to me, so I am asking him (or her??) what it is about the photos that identifies them as chemtrails.

ther must be something that identifies them - otherwise why make the claim?



did you see my post to you making the correction about airline vs. airfield and what where your thoughts?


Evergreen is not a particularly large airline - it is a favourite fall-guy for conspiracies of all sorts because of its association with the CIA, especially at Pinal Airpark - where the CIA used to base its aviation operations.

In relation to chemtrails it is afavourite because it has a B747 water tanker- photos of which used to be posted as "proof" of chemtrails - which was, of course, just more arrant ignorance - but it took a few years for chemmies to understand why.

apart from that - so what?
edit on 4-3-2013 by Aloysius the Gaul because: (no reason given)




top topics



 
25
<< 6  7  8    10  11  12 >>

log in

join