posted on Mar, 10 2013 @ 05:44 AM
reply to post by AndyMayhew
Very true, a few pages back I repeated a question I have been asking on here for years, I am wanting someone to point out what links seeing trails in
the sky to ANY of the evidence that Chemtrail believers trust?
The way I see this particular theory is that some people, either through ignorance of aviation and genuine concern or through knowledge of how easily
a buck can be made from the gullible, pointed at thick visible aircraft contrails and started calling it a deliberate spraying operation. They then
tried to reinforce that claim by hauling in as 'evidence' reports of GE proposals that don't describe anything like contrails, rainwater and sludge
testing that seems to somehow prove that any particle that falls to earth can only come from a contrail, and patents that describe various proposals
for mechanisms without any evidence at all that any of them have been made and used, this is considered valid evidence despite there also being
patents for time machines and other unused and useable ideas by the thousands.
So what tangibly connects ANY of this evidence to actual trails in the sky apart from somebody claimed it or an assumption based on the believer
being unable to "accept" that regular flights can cause grids, crosses and persistent spreading trails?
So far, not one single reply to that direct question, I only hope it has resulted in some people questioning inwardly why they believe, and trying to
find the answer.
It's not even a matter of joing the dots. There are no dots, just disparate, unconnected items jammed together, in a sort of 'Frankentheory'.
Of course I've had the entirely transparent response that says that they know, but don't want to say, but we know what that really means. If I knew
the answer I'd be shouting it loud and clear.
edit on 10-3-2013 by waynos because: (no reason given)