It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

I want to be a CHEMTRAIL DEBUNKER

page: 14
25
<< 11  12  13    15  16  17 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 4 2013 @ 07:39 PM
link   
You can't because it's not possible...
On a related note, have you seen the RIDICULOUS pictures of chem trails just hovering over the oceans of the world. Areas where there are no commercial routes? The notion of the chems being formed over land and following the jet stream out to sea isn't a viable theory as contrails don't exist long enough to make the 8 hour journey.




posted on Mar, 4 2013 @ 07:40 PM
link   
reply to post by BrainWasher
 


Wait.

It all makes sense, welcome back profundus!

You didn't wait long to come back and start your misinformation campaign again did it?



posted on Mar, 4 2013 @ 07:43 PM
link   
reply to post by BrainWasher
 


You attack a person to make your point.
No. I attacked no one to make my points. I "attacked" you because of your pointless rants.


Like i said, most scientists are led to believe they're doing a service to better mankind; when in reality, they're only helping tptb fulfill their goals and agendas.
Like I said, you don't know anything about the science being done or the scientists doing it.


Tell them to find a cure for cancer
Ooo. Bad try. Guess what? They cured me. Twenty six years ago.


My attack is on government and anyone involved with it's corruption.
Your attack began when you ran out of logical arguments about why "chemtrails" are nothing other than contrails. Why is that? Why do have to jump into statements about 911 and "mad scientists" instead of discussing the topic? Wait. I was wrong. You started your attack before you presented any logical arguments about why "chemtrails" are nothing other than contrails. You have no rational argument do you? Just, "those are 'chemtrails'".


I'm sure someone is making big bucks from these geoengineering tactics.
What geoengineering tactics? You have provided no evidence that anything is being done.
edit on 3/4/2013 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 4 2013 @ 08:30 PM
link   

Originally posted by Chadwickus
reply to post by BrainWasher
 




Excuse me, Sir, but, is there a reason why you talk down to people??? Is there a reason why you ridicule people? It doesn't make for a healthy debate


Why aren't you upset with your friend bluestorm for talking down and ridiculing people?


Example:

Originally posted by bluestorm

Originally posted by BrainWasher


If times are so hard, where is everybody going???


according to phage there are various reasons for planes to "fly in circles", falling under the category of "holding patterns".

LOL


Maybe because he's never insulted me? It seems like all the contrailers do is force their scientific knowledge on people. If people say something that doesn't coincide with their indoctrinated scientic minds, they're idiots, stupid, crazy and don't know what they're talking about. Here's the thing. None of you know anything about me, so please, don't assume. If you want to have an intellectual conversation or debate, leave out the disrespect and name calling. It's not very mature, and it doesn't make your point any more concrete. It actually make YOU look like a fool who knows nothing.



posted on Mar, 4 2013 @ 08:46 PM
link   

Originally posted by Chadwickus
reply to post by BrainWasher
 


Wait.

It all makes sense, welcome back profundus!

You didn't wait long to come back and start your misinformation campaign again did it?
Misinformation campaign? I'm not misinforming anyone. I have my reservations about gov't activities hidden behind the word, "science". There's more questions to this topic than there are answers. That's what the real problem is.

FYI, i'm a regular fellow, not a gov't employee, who saw all the BS 12 years ago. I've been coming to ATS alot longer than some of you veterans. I'm not new to this place. i've been around for about 6-8 years, maybe longer, can't remember. Posters on ATS are the reason why i decided to go down that rabbit hole and wake up. There's nothing i haven't seen and nothing i haven't heard or researched. I'll be honest and say this...some of you old schoolers, that have been around for a while, i've seen get away with T&C violations and never get their quotes blocked, nor do they get reprimanded. Just makes you wonder, WHY? I'm SURE i'll get banned again, FOR NO REASON! Some of the staff here have a problem with "newcomers" making the veterans look FOOLISH.



posted on Mar, 4 2013 @ 08:51 PM
link   
reply to post by Phage
 


Ok I will bite on this one.
What was flying at these altitudes in 1919? We are still talking about jet level flight and by looking at the available options for flight from that time it would seem pilots would have a hard time keeping worm and breathing.
Sir?
………………………………....Painfulhead



posted on Mar, 4 2013 @ 08:54 PM
link   



posted on Mar, 4 2013 @ 08:55 PM
link   

Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by BrainWasher
 


You attack a person to make your point.
No. I attacked no one to make my points. I "attacked" you because of your pointless rants.


Like i said, most scientists are led to believe they're doing a service to better mankind; when in reality, they're only helping tptb fulfill their goals and agendas.
Like I said, you don't know anything about the science being done or the scientists doing it.


Tell them to find a cure for cancer
Ooo. Bad try. Guess what? They cured me. Twenty six years ago.


My attack is on government and anyone involved with it's corruption.
Your attack began when you ran out of logical arguments about why "chemtrails" are nothing other than contrails. Why is that? Why do have to jump into statements about 911 and "mad scientists" instead of discussing the topic? Wait. I was wrong. You started your attack before you presented any logical arguments about why "chemtrails" are nothing other than contrails. You have no rational argument do you? Just, "those are 'chemtrails'".


I'm sure someone is making big bucks from these geoengineering tactics.
What geoengineering tactics? You have provided no evidence that anything is being done.
edit on 3/4/2013 by Phage because: (no reason given)
Hey Phage...me and you have gone through these battles EVERY TIME the word CHEMTRAIL is posted on ATS; and it always winds up with the same results. Me beating you in a debate, which leads to me getting banned. You say "contrails" and i combat you with geoengineering and cloudseeding FACTS. I'm tired of debating the same ole corny topic that leads to me getting banned. Tell the mods to stop playing favorites and i'll debate you ONE FINAL TIME.

You can play the meteorology card if you want to, but you still can't PROVE that there is nothing in either chemtrails or contrails. You can only give so-called "facts" but your facts only prove how clouds are made. Nothing more!



posted on Mar, 4 2013 @ 09:08 PM
link   

Originally posted by Painfulhead
reply to post by Phage
 


Ok I will bite on this one.
What was flying at these altitudes in 1919? We are still talking about jet level flight and by looking at the available options for flight from that time it would seem pilots would have a hard time keeping worm and breathing.


They were early fighter aircraft operating at 20,000 feet or a little above by the end of the war, and yes, the pilots did have a hard time breathing and did suffer from cold.

However experimetnal oxygen equipment was being used - eg in the fokker D-VII - this aircraft had a service ceilingof 6000m - about 19,600 feet - but note that this is not the maximum height it can go - it is the height at which, under specified conditions, teh rate of climb is only 100 feet per minute - so it could actually go higher - especially on a cold day when the air is denser and so providing more lift for the wings and power for the engines.

the Spad 13 had a service ceiling of 6600m - almost 22000 feet, hte Albatross D-V, SE-5a and Sopwith Snipe all had service ceilings of 18-19,000 feet, the Fokker Triplane (Dr-1) got to 20,000 feet, and Snoopy's Sopwith Camel could get to 21,000 feet.

these altitudes are a little on the low side compared to the normal altitude of contrails today - but that altitude makes contrails unusual, not impossible, and the small number recorded is a reflection of this.



posted on Mar, 4 2013 @ 09:08 PM
link   

Originally posted by bluestorm
reply to post by Phage
 


www.guardian.co.uk...



Yep - the proof that it is not happening at the moment is all over the place.



posted on Mar, 4 2013 @ 09:18 PM
link   
reply to post by Painfulhead
 

While it would be very cold at 26,000 there is no reason to think that the aircraft wouldn't have had some provision for heating and warm clothing would certainly have been in order. Supplemental oxygen was available at the time. For reference, in 1862 a ballooning record was set at 39,000 feet.

In 1916 an aircraft altitude record was set at 26,083 feet in an French bomber. In 1920 a new record was set at 33,113 feet in an American plane.



posted on Mar, 4 2013 @ 09:21 PM
link   
reply to post by Aloysius the Gaul
 


thanks for the fast response. good info.
.............................Painfulhead



posted on Mar, 4 2013 @ 09:24 PM
link   
reply to post by BrainWasher
 


Me beating you in a debate, which leads to me getting banned.
Sure.


You say "contrails" and i combat you with geoengineering and cloudseeding FACTS.
What geoengineering facts? You haven't presented any which indicate SRM is being done. What does cloud seeding have to to with "chemtrails"?


Tell the mods to stop playing favorites and i'll debate you ONE FINAL TIME.
I don't tell the mods what to do. You have not participated in a debate, you have evaded questions and presented no evidence.


You can play the meteorology card if you want to, but you still can't PROVE that there is nothing in either chemtrails or contrails.
There is ice and small amounts of combustion products in contrails. Since what people seem to be calling "chemtrails" appear to be nothing other than contrails I have no reason to believe they are any different. Did you know my neighbor's cat is a robot? Prove it isn't.


You can only give so-called "facts" but your facts only prove how clouds are made.
And you cannot provide any evidence (much less proof) that indicates that "chemtrails" are anything but clouds.




edit on 3/4/2013 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 4 2013 @ 09:24 PM
link   

Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul

Originally posted by bluestorm
reply to post by Phage
 


www.guardian.co.uk...



Yep - the proof that it is not happening at the moment is all over the place.
That's what they WANT YOU TO BELIEVE. They also want us to believe our eyes are lying to us. If they had ideas and talks about this topic 50 years ago, you telling me, there has been no advancement, since then? You're telling me, all this geoengineering talk is only hypothetical, being done on computer modulations, after 50 or so years? Does that even sound right? Common sense goes a long way.



posted on Mar, 4 2013 @ 09:28 PM
link   
reply to post by bluestorm
 

That article is incorrect and misleading.

The group which Gates helps fund does not lobby for large-scale geoengineering SRM.

Q. Does the fund support field testing of geoengineering?
A. FICER has not supported and will not support any field tests of methods that introduce new kinds of interference into the climate system (e.g., solar radiation management, ocean fertilization). We are in favor of field testing industrial processes that can remove excess carbon dioxide from the atmosphere.

keith.seas.harvard.edu...


edit on 3/4/2013 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 4 2013 @ 09:30 PM
link   
reply to post by BrainWasher
 


If they had ideas and talks about this topic 50 years ago, you telling me, there has been no advancement, since then?
50 years ago it wasn't known that global warming was occurring. 50 Years ago there weren't really any studies regarding SRM but there were studies of contrails.



You're telling me, all this geoengineering talk is only hypothetical, being done on computer modulations, after 50 or so years?

For the third time... Models. Computer models.
Yes, SRM studies (in the US at least, no idea what China might be messing around with but I don't think they're sending all those planes over the US) are being conducted only with computer models. Oh, some lab work as well to help refine the models.

edit on 3/4/2013 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 4 2013 @ 09:46 PM
link   

Originally posted by BrainWasher

Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by BrainWasher
 


You attack a person to make your point.
No. I attacked no one to make my points. I "attacked" you because of your pointless rants.


Like i said, most scientists are led to believe they're doing a service to better mankind; when in reality, they're only helping tptb fulfill their goals and agendas.
Like I said, you don't know anything about the science being done or the scientists doing it.


Tell them to find a cure for cancer
Ooo. Bad try. Guess what? They cured me. Twenty six years ago.


My attack is on government and anyone involved with it's corruption.
Your attack began when you ran out of logical arguments about why "chemtrails" are nothing other than contrails. Why is that? Why do have to jump into statements about 911 and "mad scientists" instead of discussing the topic? Wait. I was wrong. You started your attack before you presented any logical arguments about why "chemtrails" are nothing other than contrails. You have no rational argument do you? Just, "those are 'chemtrails'".


I'm sure someone is making big bucks from these geoengineering tactics.
What geoengineering tactics? You have provided no evidence that anything is being done.
edit on 3/4/2013 by Phage because: (no reason given)
Hey Phage...me and you have gone through these battles EVERY TIME the word CHEMTRAIL is posted on ATS; and it always winds up with the same results. Me beating you in a debate, which leads to me getting banned. You say "contrails" and i combat you with geoengineering and cloudseeding FACTS. I'm tired of debating the same ole corny topic that leads to me getting banned. Tell the mods to stop playing favorites and i'll debate you ONE FINAL TIME.

You can play the meteorology card if you want to, but you still can't PROVE that there is nothing in either chemtrails or contrails. You can only give so-called "facts" but your facts only prove how clouds are made. Nothing more!


Sir, you yap about him not being able to provide proof that there is nothing in the trails ... but you cant prove that there is. So where does that leave us at this moment, other than a he said/she said back and forth? The chemtrail believers are the ones making the claims that these persistent trails are in fact "chemtrails" rather than contrails. With that claim, they need to provide EVIDENCE of it. It gets said time and time again, and its getting said here again - the burden of proof is on the accuser.

This has nothing to do with spraying for mosquitoes, this has nothing to do with the low-level drops that happened in the 1950s, this has nothing to do with cloud seeding ... this is about the claims that those lingering trails coming from high-altitude planes are more than just contrails.



posted on Mar, 4 2013 @ 09:48 PM
link   

Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by BrainWasher
 


Me beating you in a debate, which leads to me getting banned.
Sure.


You say "contrails" and i combat you with geoengineering and cloudseeding FACTS.
What geoengineering facts? You haven't presented any which indicate SRM is being done. What does cloud seeding have to to with "chemtrails"?


Tell the mods to stop playing favorites and i'll debate you ONE FINAL TIME.
I don't tell the mods what to do. You have not participated in a debate, you have evaded questions and presented no evidence.


You can play the meteorology card if you want to, but you still can't PROVE that there is nothing in either chemtrails or contrails.
Did you know my neighbors cat is a robot? Prove it isn't.


You can only give so-called "facts" but your facts only prove how clouds are made.
And you cannot provide any evidence (much less proof) that indicates that "chemtrails" are anything but clouds.

I've participated in MANY debates with you. Do i need to get links to back up what i'm saying? Do you remember this thread: Is HAARP feeding SANDY? (The Conspiracy Side) That was my thread and you were QUICK to jump in on that, also. And, guess what? That was another BAN for me, for no reason. You may not tell the mods what to do...but, they certainly do play favorites. Everyone knows who you are, here on ATS. And, no one knows me. Catch is, i've been here longer than you! I also look at both sides of the coin, not just the 1; like you do! People look up to you, for advice, because they're too LAZY to search for themselves. I have ZERO respect for you simply because you THINK you're smarter than everyone else; and belittle anyone that tries to challenge you.

I know ALL of your tricks and tactics, which usually involves ripping apart people's sentences so you can make your point seem like "fact". Kinda like you've done with this comment and throughout this thread.

What PROOF do you have, besides "proof" or "facts" on how contrails and clouds are made??? NONE!!! NONE what-so-ever! Absolutely ZIP! You don't know and can't say definitively that they're not spraying stuff. I don't like using the word "chemicals"....so i'd rather use the word, stuff! No one but those in the "know" knows what's going on. So, do yourself a favor and stop acting like you're in the "know". You know as much as the rest of us! NOTHING!



posted on Mar, 4 2013 @ 09:53 PM
link   
reply to post by BrainWasher
 


I've participated in MANY debates with you.
A debate is not a matter of saying "you are wrong". A debate is a matter of presenting evidence to support your position and responding to questions directed at you.


I have ZERO respect for you simply because you THINK you're smarter than everyone else; and belittle anyone that tries to challenge you.
I don't really care if you have any respect for me. I don't think I'm smarter than everyone else but I have noticed that there are a lot of people who do very little actual research, relying instead on "chemtrail" sites and silly unsubstantated and ignorant claims about HAARP.


I know ALL of your tricks and tactics, which usually involves ripping apart people's sentences so you can make your point seem like "fact". Kinda like you've done with this comment and throughout this thread.
I don't rip apart sentences. I address the points made, or attempted to be made.


You know as much as the rest of us! NOTHING!
False.



posted on Mar, 4 2013 @ 10:05 PM
link   

Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by BrainWasher
 


If they had ideas and talks about this topic 50 years ago, you telling me, there has been no advancement, since then?
50 years ago it wasn't known that global warming was occurring. 50 Years ago there weren't really any studies regarding SRM but there were studies of contrails.



You're telling me, all this geoengineering talk is only hypothetical, being done on computer modulations, after 50 or so years?

For the third time... Models. Computer models.
Yes, SRM studies (in the US at least, no idea what China might be messing around with but I don't think they're sending all those planes over the US) are being conducted only with computer models. Oh, some lab work as well to help refine the models.

edit on 3/4/2013 by Phage because: (no reason given)
I'm not going to repost stuff i've already posted. Feel free to dig through my comments, under the name Profundus:So Maybe There Are Chemtrails or here: A serious question about chemtrails These are 2 of the topics we've debated. There's many more.

To think this stuff is only hypothetical and happening on a computer module is ABSURD! You might as well be using a dial up connection with a modem.




top topics



 
25
<< 11  12  13    15  16  17 >>

log in

join