posted on Mar, 4 2013 @ 08:54 AM
reply to post by lawman27
I'm not a Policeman, I'm a lawyer (not CPS either), so my first instinct is to look for the explanation. If you read an article about the inquest,
you'll see the verdict is accidental death. Inquests are held by a coroner who is independent of the police and CPS and can and often does, order
further investigations. You'll also see that the accident happened at the Uddens Drive junction of the A31 in Wimbourne, Dorset, and the 'Special
Police' officer (ie a volunteer with minimal training, not an actual Policewoman) was emerging from Uddens Drive onto the A 31 when she collided with
the biker who had overtaken several vehicles. Looking at the road markings, the biker must have driven over the chevrons to do so. For those of you
unfamiliar with UK road markings, white Chevron markings mean 'do not cross' and are positioned where necessary to prevent accidents, usually at
junctions and right turns. The UK Highway Code also prohibits overtaking at a junction.
Ahhhh yeah, lets make excuses for her eh... If she did no wrong then why would she lie? Now surely you as a super smart lawyer can work that one out
So, granted she lied about her mobile, and granted she looks incredibly smug and self satisfied at Court, that doesnt make her a murderer. It may be
she didnt look when pulling out, but an equally plausible explanation is that she saw the approaching cars, judged she had sufficent time to pull out,
and didnt have time to react when the biker used his superior acceleration to blast past them on the chevrons.
Oh yeah... She lied and that and looks super happy at the hearing regarding a human being she had killed, but lets just put all that to one side, you
know... Forget about it... NO...
Who said she was a murderer? Now surely you as a super smart lawyer must know that murder is when you have intent and forethought... Which clearly
this was not the case and no-one said anything like what you insinuate...
Then you just go on to make a whole bunch of stuff up so that it takes away the guilt from your co-worker! And yes, she is your co-worker... The
reason I say that is because YOU are part of the system! Hell you profit nicely form the system! Of course you are going to defend the damn system! No
matter who the system harms or kills in the process! You sir couldn't give a damn just so long as you get your paycheck! You can make all the excuses
you like, but the issue is much larger than this one incident, just see my previous post!
Now before all the bikers start making death threats, I'm not saying that did happen, just that it is possible, that I have dealt with hundreds of
claims in similiar circumstances so I know it does happen, and that the biker had apparently ignored two road traffic laws which were there to protect
I'm not a biker but what exactly is the point of your made up story other than to defend your pig co-worker? Hmmm?
ATS is supposed to be about reasoned discourse-if you only want to post 'Jail her for life, she's a murdering pig fascist nazi' type comment, I'm sure
there are better forums for you.
Now, see here was me thinking that ATS was a place to deny ignorance but you display a fair bit of it so what gives? Which is right? You know what,
maybe we both are and it is just our opinion and neither of us are an "authority" (oh you love that word don't you? Make you excited does it?) on what
ATS should or should not be.
See my problem is that it is IMMORAL to initiate FORCE against anyone! But your crowd loves force doesn't it... Even your name, "lawman"... Oh you
just love the law don't you? More the merrier eh? Can anyone say KA CHING?
I'm ever so sorry if you do not like me or my tone, but just to let you know that it is completely fine as the feeling is very much mutual.
Btw you might want to look up "stockholm syndrome", could answer some questions for you...
edit on 4-3-2013 by mee30 because: (no reason