It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by arpgme
reply to post by smithjustinb
Will is desire and acting on the desire.
If you do not have a will then another person or power will have one for you. Those who do not have an inner dream are nothing but slaves to their surroundings.
"Will always infringes on freedom in some way."
If you are following your will and allowing another to follow theirs then how is freedom infringed? As long as one's will is not forced upon another or their property without agreement it is not "infringed", right? and if not how?edit on 3-3-2013 by arpgme because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by SeekerofTruth101
But what if your freedoms collide and cause pain to his freedoms or vice versa?
What is your view on all of this?
Originally posted by arpgme
More and more people are buying into this idea that "freedom from desire" is true freedom, but these people seem to be the same ones talking about "surrendering/accepting" and allowing anything to happen. This is slave mentality.
Originally posted by arpgme
There is a purpose for these human emotions and desire to be occurring this is what gives PERSONALITY to the human body - without it , the human body would be nothing but a dead zombie. Look at all of the life in nature and how each different species acts in their own way.... the birds, the squirrels, they are living NATURAL like we used to following their hearts (emotions/desires).
@ [color=gold] By having this rule as a basis to not force on another's will - it will help solve many conflicts, but as long as we are aggressive and controlling of other people rather than our OWN choices and life - then there will be more conflict than necessary.
Originally posted by arpgme
The only difference is that we are human and we have the intellect to find a way to maximize peace and minimize pain and we can do this by having one basic rule "do what you will and do not force your will upon another or their belongs without their permission". You may think of Aleister Crowley, but I am NOT saying this is how people should live their life, I am saying this should be the BASIS and from there people are able to choose their way of life whether it be "Service to Self" or "Service to Others" or "any other philosophical view" (as long as it isn't forcing others to live by it).
@ [color=gold] So this my view "do not force your will upon another - therefore do not be aggressive/controlling of others".
Originally posted by arpgme
To me, true freedom is independence, being able to support yourself and not relying on another for anything and not letting people keep controlling or relying on you; and "free-will" is simply "being able to make own's choices without another person's threat". For example, if a person says you have "Free-will" while putting a gun to someone's head saying "give me your money or die" that is NOT free-will, that is control and threatening, TRUE free-will does NOT have consequences of another person's threats but only NATURAL consequences, for example, if you put your hand on a stove you get burned.
What is TRUE freedom?
Originally posted by BlueMule
blah, blah, I demand freedom from your semantic knee-jerk nit-picking.
Maybe that's true freedom.
What is TRUE freedom?
Unless you believe in a Spirit/Soul, Death is not freedom because once you're dead you can't make ANY choices for yourself.
How is that freedom? That is not any from of individualized expression at all. Without choices one is frozen/stuck, I'm not sure how that can be seen as freedom...