It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
In 1913, prior to the passage of the Federal Reserve Act President Wilson's The New Freedom was published, in which he revealed:
"Since I entered politics, I have chiefly had men's views confided to me privately. Some of the biggest men in the U. S., in the field of commerce and manufacturing, are afraid of somebody, are afraid of something. They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they had better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it."
On November 21, 1933, President Franklin Roosevelt wrote a letter to Col. Edward Mandell House, President Woodrow Wilson's close advisor:
Originally posted by Zanti Misfit
reply to post by Hopechest
......." have it very wrong. Reading through some of the historical quotes from top level government officials over the decades, two thing becomes very clear. "
LOL , and you Actually Believe these Alledged " historical quotes" ? .....Guess Again , The LIE Is Almighty in Goverment , or are you that Nieve to see it otherwise ? .........
Originally posted by Honor93
clearly you've just skimmed the cream off the top of this endless pit but by all means, keep digging.
if you dare to go back to the beginning, check out the Treaty of Paris and then decide if it really represents a wartime victory.
then realize, that everything except the Declaration of Independence came after it.
if this idea confuses you, read the treaty again, only slower and then you'll begin to see a much clearer picture.
treaty
and here's another xSenator's view should you be interested ... www.hiddenmysteries.org...
and one more everyone should watch is Eisenhower's farewell speech in it's entirety.
spoiler alert -- it's the same "force" we never really broke away from originally -- the Crown.
Those who think high level figures in government are part of conspiracy have it very wrong.
Just a broad outline based on the speculation of a few quotes but I'll post more if this goes anywhere.
Originally posted by jude11
Those who think high level figures in government are part of conspiracy have it very wrong.
Just a broad outline based on the speculation of a few quotes but I'll post more if this goes anywhere.
So which is it?
Sounds like you make a solid statement and then leave it open "If it goes anywhere".
Peace