It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Since it isn't time that's changing, what causes the different rates that exist in the measurements.
at first I was addressing you about you bringing up the year and gps satellites
Yes, I get it.
Originally posted by Phage
Get it? Relativity and stuff.
And, what is the US Navy supposed to tell us? That they calibrated the GPS clocks in the opposite direction predicted by relativity?
Originally posted by Angelic Resurrection
Lol pl chk with the us navy since Von Braun is no longer with us, the history of gps.
Here's an example:
Originally posted by DenyObfuscation
If a GPS clock is not adjusted for orbit then the clock simply does not keep time accurately. It doesn't matter whether it's running too slowly or too quickly, it doesn't go off into the future or fall back into the past.
Originally posted by DenyObfuscation
reply to post by ImaFungi
at first I was addressing you about you bringing up the year and gps satellites
The duration of the period is not important. What matters is that regardless of what the displays might indicate due to improper calibration for the conditions, the clocks will experience contemporaneous periodicity.
If a GPS clock is not adjusted for orbit then the clock simply does not keep time accurately. It doesn't matter whether it's running too slowly or too quickly, it doesn't go off into the future or fall back into the past.
I'm left to wonder what exactly is meant by "change in the rate or flow of time".
For the satellite in orbit compared to a ground reference, the difference would be 38 microseconds a day times the number of days in 15 years
Correct. They don't time travel. But they do return to Earth aged a bit more than us groundbound types. But there's really no way to demonstrate that.
They don't drift into the future or the past.
They are there, and measurable, but not noticeable. Correcting form them is the reason for the GPS calibration...so the true travel time (and therefore distance) can be calculated by the receiver.
Where are the communication delays beyond time for transmissions to travel?
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by DenyObfuscation
Correct. They don't time travel. But they do return to Earth aged a bit more than us groundbound types. But there's really no way to demonstrate that.
They don't drift into the future or the past.
They are there, and measurable, but not noticeable. Correcting form them is the reason for the GPS calibration...so the true travel time (and therefore distance) can be calculated by the receiver.
Where are the communication delays beyond time for transmissions to travel?
edit on 3/5/2013 by Phage because: (no reason given)
They are there, and measurable, but not noticeable.
So wouldnt the astronauts age less then on earth, because they are traveling relatively faster then us ( which means relatively closer to the speed of light)?
You are saying, regardless of what people and clocks are doing right now, there is a steady moment of now that governs them all; moment to moment all objects in the universe that exist, exist.
You are only considering special relativity. The effects of general relativity must also be taken into account. This has been pointed out more than once.
So wouldnt the astronauts age less then on earth, because they are traveling relatively faster then us ( which means relatively closer to the speed of light)?
Sorry. There is no change in the delay. That is determined by the distance alone. It is the measurement of that delay which becomes problematic because of the effects of time dilation on the orbital clocks. The only way to measure the delay is by knowing when the signal is transmitted. And there is the rub.
There is a delay in transmission equal to the speed of light plus the daily differential multiplied by the number of days ISS has been in orbit?
I'm not even sure that velocity itself is a factor in the process.
Originally posted by DenyObfuscation
reply to post by ImaFungi
So wouldnt the astronauts age less then on earth, because they are traveling relatively faster then us ( which means relatively closer to the speed of light)?
I would think they would age more up there due to the stress caused by all those alien ships so many think they see flying around the ISS. But yes, I thought faster travel meant slower aging.
I'm not even sure that velocity itself is a factor in the process. All motion outside of thought experiments occurs within a gravitational field. I think the gravity may be the cause of altered physical process rates. Velocity in a gravity free environment MAY have no effect on process rates at all.
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by ImaFungi
You are only considering special relativity. The effects of general relativity must also be taken into account. This has been pointed out more than once.
So wouldnt the astronauts age less then on earth, because they are traveling relatively faster then us ( which means relatively closer to the speed of light)?
The difference in gravitational potential puts the satellite in a different frame of reference from the surface.
How exactly does the GR tie in?