reply to post by Kantzveldt
OK - I thought mentioning them to be appropriate here because you did hint me here with a link in your answer.
I didn't want to disturb other readers (here!) to much and because of that I called them FL so that no one would right away know who I revered to but
Look at it as some advertisement if you want - but you are right - in a way - that I like to stir up some comfy conventions.
If you feel not drained by them and won't bring them up here it's obviously fine with me.
Everyone has an individual threshold of endurance.
I've thought about the thread about the tree that you suggest here to me, I can't deny it.
After reading some terrible "information" around here at ATS.
But there is sooo much they don't know that they shouldn't be disturbed this way - and it's not their fault.
They do their best to their knowledge.
Their biggest mistake instead is to BELIEVE what they READ.
But only finding the difference between AK's and the reformer's versions won't get anyone anywhere (pun intended) and only the newest physical
M-theory equates this 11 dimensional model as a modern model.
This is very close to your portal thinking and patterns you are used to.
It was info for you.
They wouldn't know what to make of it.
For you it could be a new step I thought but no hustle...
For what I could tell them there would be no possible "quotes" (but eating the vomit of forerunners is not considered healthy where I come from!) in
their part of the world.
They are not used to LOOK for themselves.
This is WHY I only mentioned the DAATH in the Tree and AK.
You won't find the mistake I referred to in any literature I think.
One has to discover it with his/her own eyes. The later "reformers" thought that they CORRECTED a mistake in HIS work what was so OBVIOUS to THEM
that they didn't even mention it and then they messed it all up with best intentions in mind.
So only by looking - and not at the literature - you can decide to discard all who came after AK because his work was the model all others used later
- to derange and "reform" away the essence of it.
In the (ATS) world the parameters I work with are not known and there could be no discussion.
So no - I won't do such a thread here.