It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Source
NBC News has learned the U.S. Navy is expected to announce that they intend to cancel the Blue Angels shows for all of April 2013. This includes a show scheduled for Tampa, FL.
The precision flight team wows spectators at air shows with their skills. Cancellations would also include shows in Texas, Georgia and South Carolina.
Source
The Pentagon spends $37 million for the Blue Angels, whose mission is to enhance recruiting for the Navy and Marines and to be their public goodwill ambassador. That's a fraction of the Pentagon's $926 billion annual budget, but that's not the point, critics say. They argue that lots of smaller programs will have to be eliminated to meet required spending reductions.
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
Make the cuts real and some trimming to demonstration teams makes sense. Make the cuts symbolic and political like this garbage is? I think it's unconscionable.
Originally posted by Aleister
reply to post by Wrabbit2000
This seems to be a calculated move to focus even more attention of the ongoing "battle" occurring within both U.S. political parties to fix the blame when the public begins to be effected by the automatic cuts. To cancel the Angels April schedule means, to me, that the Pentagon believes the two sides will have an agreement in place well before April, and the Tampa show (and the others) will go on as planned. The Blue Angels are now pawns in the game. (I've only seen them live flying over a city on the way to perform, they made at least two and maybe three passes).
edit on 1-3-2013 by Aleister because: (no reason given)
It’s official.
Late Friday evening, President Barack Obama signed an order – as required by the “sequester” legislation – to enact broad cuts to federal spending, according to a White House release.
Those cuts will now officially go into effect at midnight Friday.
Originally posted by Honor93
reply to post by Tardacus
not really, since government shutdowns have occurred 17 times since 1977, more often than not they do not last a full 2wks ... just long enough to rile the intended 'audience'
Originally posted by Tardacus
Originally posted by Honor93
reply to post by Tardacus
not really, since government shutdowns have occurred 17 times since 1977, more often than not they do not last a full 2wks ... just long enough to rile the intended 'audience'
but those shutdowns happened while they were still negotiating and trying to work out a deal, right? not after a deal was signed.
The US Air Force has awarded Lockheed Martin an indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity contract with a ceiling of $6.9 billion to upgrade the service’s fleet of F-22 Raptor stealth fighters.
yes and no ... no because there is no 'deal' signed.
Originally posted by Tardacus
Originally posted by Honor93
reply to post by Tardacus
not really, since government shutdowns have occurred 17 times since 1977, more often than not they do not last a full 2wks ... just long enough to rile the intended 'audience'
but those shutdowns happened while they were still negotiating and trying to work out a deal, right? not after a deal was signed.
But House Speaker John Boehner has said he's done negotiating. The House, Boehner says, has twice passed legislation that would undo the sequester, and should not have pass a third bill before the Democrat-controlled Senate "gets off their ass and passes it once." He has also stated that Republicans will not play ball on new tax revenue, telling the president, "You got your tax increase; it's time to cut spending here in Washington."
In a statement this morning, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., added: "We promised the American people that we would cut Washington spending, and the President signed those cuts into law. Republicans have offered the President numerous solutions, including the flexibility he needs to secure those reductions more intelligently. I'm happy to discuss other ideas to keep our commitment to reducing Washington spending at today's meeting. But there will be no last-minute, back-room deal and absolutely no agreement to increase taxes."
in other words, these are activities that the sequester/cuts may NOT directly effect.
What Activities Are Considered Directly Related to Protecting Life and Property?
An OPM memorandum from 1981, which remained in effect during the last government shutdown in 1996, provided the following determination of exempt activities: