It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Witness reports on Twitter claim that Iraq's armed forces shelled the border checkpoint at Al Ya'robiya on Friday night.
really RT has to be the worst news outlet of them all
I think we should give every country in the Middle East 2 dozen nuclear weapons and then slowly back up.
Originally posted by rockymcgilicutty
reply to post by aarys
Reminds me of what happen in Iraq. The U.S didn't get rid of the foreign fighters, or al Qaeda. The people of Iraq did. The tribal leaders got tired of car bombs and civilian deaths banned togther and killed or ran them out.
Let the leaders of Islam handle their own problems. But let's not forget that the people of Syria, wanted change we should support them.
Not the radicals and terrorist that came into Syria later.
Originally posted by Hopechest
I think we should give every country in the Middle East 2 dozen nuclear weapons and then slowly back up.
They will all either become very respectable or blow themselves up.
Either option is preferable to this constant fighting.
Originally posted by DarknStormy
As for the topic itself, good for Iraq. This is an interesting development considering the Al Nusrah front are the best fighters in Syria. Take those terrorists away and the Revolution is over.
Originally posted by rockymcgilicutty
The U.S didn't get rid of the foreign fighters, or al Qaeda. The people of Iraq did. The tribal leaders got tired of car bombs and civilian deaths banned togther and killed or ran them out.
Originally posted by Mr Tranny
Originally posted by rockymcgilicutty
The U.S didn't get rid of the foreign fighters, or al Qaeda. The people of Iraq did. The tribal leaders got tired of car bombs and civilian deaths banned togther and killed or ran them out.
Duhh.............
That is kind of self evident. The only people that can drive an unwanted force out of a country, is if the people that live in that country. As long as the population tolerates the unwanted group, they will never leave.
An outside force can help facilitate the local people removing them, but they can’t do it if the local people don’t take the initiative.
Originally posted by SLAYER69
Originally posted by DarknStormy
As for the topic itself, good for Iraq. This is an interesting development considering the Al Nusrah front are the best fighters in Syria. Take those terrorists away and the Revolution is over.
I'd like to hear more. I'm not disagreeing just like to hear more of what you think on that angle.
Care to expand on this?
Originally posted by Agent_USA_Supporter
reply to post by DarknStormy
I had seen such type of users before on the guardian and before on CNN if they dont agree with you they will start verbally insulting you and bullying in front of the global audience.
This is not surprising, has ATS being over ran by some bot users?
Originally posted by Sek82
Let me see if I have this straight.
The country we just spent a decade transforming into a US ally is attacking the same group we are currently funding in order to overthrow another country?