reply to post by fireyaguns
I'll bite this one myself.
Is geo-engineering by planes leaving long, white puffy trails behind airplanes today? NO.
Why not? It is too risky to try, and for any kind of effect to take place, there would have to be many more planes all dedicated to spreading some
agent into the stratosphere. That is not something that can be hidden.
If you actually read and understand all the real
geo-engineering reports, not relying on other people's representation and cherry picking of
the information provided, you will see that the plan to have planes flying to stop global warming would have to be flying all the time. This is not
an operation that could be accomplished by a smidgen of chemical hidden in jet fuel, or tanks somehow hidden on planes.
There is no proof that either of these two scenarios exist, despite testimonials by anonymous people who differ in their story anyway. Which is why
they should not be believed. There are not planes built now to conduct the type of distribution of chemical needed, despite claims to the contrary,
which invariably show previously and definitively
debunked pictures of weight distribution flights or photos of planes set to sample the very
thing they are supposed to create. Which is why they should not be believed. There is no person/nation/organization that is able to do this an
operation of the size needed without being very obvious to anyone who works on or around airplanes. Which is why they should not be believed.
And the contrails now are most likely retaining heat, which is counter-productive. What would it profit (because that seems to be the main reason
"chemtrail" believers think it is happening) to do something that will knowingly give you the opposite effect of your goal? It doesn't make
The number one reason an operation to geo-engineer by airplanes is not happening now is that all the people who say it is are unable, not just merely
unwilling, to produce any evidence whatsoever. Patents are words on paper, not evidence. Anecdotal stories are words alone, not evidence. Pictures
of what is easily explained as contrails or clouds being declared "chemtrails" by eyesight are not evidence. Statements of persistence being a
visual clue are wrong, so are not evidence.
There has been nothing produced as evidence by "chemtrail" believers that cannot and has not been debunked or explained, so their words, beliefs,
and feelings are not evidence that anything they claim is happening actually is happening. And there has not been any attempt by the people who do
not understand that science to explain how the science is somehow wrong, except their suspicions and "feelings". Science is empirical and does not
change. If it is somehow wrong, prove it, don't just whine about the people who use it all sounding the same.