It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Sorry, but I'm a linear thinker. So bending my mind to find ways to fit theories does not compute.
HAARP has nothing to do with "chemtrails",
unless you believe in multiple conspiracies,
with all the players working together. This makes logistics all the harder.....more people, more meetings to 'bend their minds", and more chance for someone to mess up the security.
HAARP does what it is made to do, for the reason it was made for, and nothing else.
It's far too small to do what you claim.
It is also far from being a closed secret......
if you are in Alaska in the spring and summer, you can visit it. They even have open house events, complete with researchers to answer your questions. Heck, you can even email the people up there, when they are there, and ask them what is going on. During the winter, they have a local/locals go to the site everyday, unlock the building for a quick inspection to make sure the heat is still on. Hardly a big secret.
So why do you think otherwise? Conspiracy sites that speculate or real research from the people who work with it? I would only accept the latter.
Established in 1992, HAARP, based in Gokona, Alaska, is an array of high-powered antennas that transmit, through high-frequency radio waves, massive amounts of energy into the ionosphere (the upper layer of the atmosphere). Their construction was funded by the US Air Force, the US Navy and the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA). Operated jointly by the Air Force Research Laboratory and the Office of Naval Research, HAARP constitutes a system of powerful antennas capable of creating ‘controlled local modifications of the ionosphere’. According to its official website, www.haarp.alaska.edu , HAARP will be used ‘to induce a small, localized change in ionospheric temperature so physical reactions can be studied by other instruments located either at or close to the HAARP site’.
HAARP has been presented to public opinion as a program of scientific and academic research. US military documents seem to suggest, however, that HAARP's main objective is to "exploit the ionosphere for Department of Defense purposes." (quoted in Chossudovsky, op cit).
Without explicitly referring to the HAARP program, a US Air Force study points to the use of "induced ionospheric modifications" as a means of altering weather patterns as well as disrupting enemy communications and radar. (Ibid)
HAARP also has the ability of triggering blackouts and disrupting the electricity power system of entire regions.
An analysis of statements emanating from the US Air Force points to the unthinkable: the covert manipulation of weather patterns, communications systems and electric power as a weapon of global warfare, enabling the US to disrupt and dominate entire regions of the World.
Project Argus
This gigantic experiment created new (inner) magnetic radiation belts encompassing almost the whole earth, and injected sufficient electrons and other energetic particles into the ionosphere to cause world wide effects. The electrons traveled back and forth along magnetic force lines, causing an artificial "aurora" when striking the atmosphere near the North Pole.
The US Military planned to create a "telecommunications shield" in the ionosphere, reported in 13-20 August 1961, Keesings Historisch Archief (K.H.A.). This shield would be created "in the ionosphere at 3,000 km height, by bringing into orbit 350,000 million copper needles, each 2-4 cm long [total weight 16 kg], forming a belt 10 km thick and 40 km wide, the needles spaced about 100 m apart." This was designed to replace the ionosphere "because telecommunications are impaired by magnetic storms and solar flares." The US planned to add to the number of copper needles if the experiment proved to be successful. This plan was strongly opposed by the Intentional Union of Astronomers.
In a nutshell, this is the nucleus of the expertise just recently acquired to control the weather. By pouring measured energy that has been focussed into certain parts of the ionosphere, scientists can create all kinds of storms like hurricanes, thunderstorms, floods, tornadoes, and drought. In NEWS1198, "U.N. Treaty Proves Weather Control Is Real", we report news articles that Malaysia actually contracted with a Russian Weather Modification company to create a hurricane that would be directed close enough to clear the smoke and smog from Malaysia's cities
The above mentioned are the ones I mentioned in my Op and I believe that the high-frequency radio waves would need to bounce off of these metallic particles to accomplish the goal(s).
You'd better read that a bit more carefully, in relation to your statement about "air".
Copper needles aren't exactly particles, but the plan was to put them in the air. I'm sure REALE could make these needles however they specified.
Yes, you are trying to make a point based on unsubstantiated claims. You still haven't explained the theory of how HAARP can be used in conjunction with "chemtrail" particles to affect weather. You say that radio waves could be "bounced" off of particles but you don't say how that would be used to affect weather.
I've run out of characters, but I'm sure you get the point I'm trying to make.
Based on my knowledge, no. Radio waves don't work that way. Any effects that HAARP may have on communications would be by affecting the ionosphere and it doesn't need "spraying" to do that.
So, based on your knowledge, it would never be remotely possible to spread metallic or nano particles into the atmosphere (at whatever level) and have HAARP bounce off or charge these particles to create/destroy a storm or affect communications.
No. Because HAARP can only affect ions (charged particles). Below the ionosphere there are too few ions and too many neutral particles for HAARP to have any effect.
On a side note, since we already know that contrails help to trap heat and HAARP supposedly can heat the ionosphere, wouldn't it be possible to use these bases to doubly heat the atmosphere over an area (even without metallic particles) to affect the weather?
In order to observe the individual particles in a solution, Prof. Madhavi Krishnan and her co-workers "entice" each particle into an "electrostatic trap." It works like this: between two glass plates the size of a chip, the researchers create thousands of round energy holes. The trick is that these holes have just a weak electrostatic charge. The scientists than add a drop of the solution to the plates, whereupon each particle falls into an energy hole and remains trapped there. But the particles do not remain motionless in their trap. Instead, molecules in the solution collide with them continuously, causing the particles to move in a circular motion.
2.8. Engineered inorganic NP
Engineered inorganic NP cover a broad range of substances
including elemental metals, metal oxides and metal salts. Elemental silver is used in many products as bactericide (Morones et al., 2005), whereas elemental gold is explored for many possible applications and its catalytic activity (Brust and Liely, 2002). The use of nanoscale zero-valent iron (nZVI) for
groundwater remediation ranks as the most widely investigated environmental nanotechnological application (Nowack, in press). Metallic iron is very effective in degrading a wide variety of common contaminants such as chlorinated methanes, brominated methanes, trihalomethanes, chlorinated ethenes, chlorinates benzenes, other polychlorinated hydrocarbons, pesticides and dyes (Zhang, 2003). Successful
results from field demonstrations using nZVI have been published, with injection of 1.7e
400 kg of NP into the groundwater (Elliott and Zhang, 2001; Quinn et al., 2005).
To date approximately 30 projects are under way where nZVI is
used for site remediation (Li et al., 2006a).
Nanoparticulate metal oxides are among the most used NP (Aitken et al., 2006). Bulk materials of TiO 2, SiO
2 and aluminum and iron oxides have been produced for many years.
Within the cells NP are stored in certain locations (e.g. in-
side vesicles, mitochondria) and are able to exert a toxic re-
sponse. The small particle size, a large surface area and the
ability to generate reactive oxygen species play a major role
in toxicity of NP (Nel et al., 2006). Inflammation and fibrosis
are effects observed on an organism level, whereas oxidative
stress, antioxidant activity and cytotoxicity are observed
effects on a cellular level (Oberdörster et al., 2005). Several
respiratory and cardiovascular diseases in humans are caused
by BC (Avakian et al., 2002; Morawska and Zhang, 2002;
Armstrong et al., 2004).
Same problem, HF radio waves are niether "bounced" nor absorbed by neutral particles.
Then, by laying out a path of chemtrails(not necessarily to "bounce" HAARP energy, but to absorb it),
Have you calculated the amount of power required to do that? Ignoring the fact that HAARP can't really affect neutral particles. Ignoring the fact that HAARP can only affect a region of the ionosphere above the installation.
you could focus pockets of heat in the atmosphere and, in essence, control the trajectory and intensity of storm systems.
Yes. In the ionosphere. At an altitude of 170km. Last time I checked that is space, not the atmosphere. Not a lot of weather up there.
And if you think this is just sci-fi, remember, the Navy recently used HAARP to create plasma clouds
Well, it was actually a laser beam and it wouldn't work with radio frequencies.
Scottish and Czech scientist just build a miniature tractor beam
I think it's fascinating but not so scary.
I know, it is scary, but everything will be fine.
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by drockEst1983
Same problem, HF radio waves are niether "bounced" nor absorbed by neutral particles.
Then, by laying out a path of chemtrails(not necessarily to "bounce" HAARP energy, but to absorb it),
Have you calculated the amount of power required to do that? Ignoring the fact that HAARP can't really affect neutral particles. Ignoring the fact that HAARP can only affect a region of the ionosphere above the installation.
you could focus pockets of heat in the atmosphere and, in essence, control the trajectory and intensity of storm systems.
Yes. In the ionosphere. At an altitude of 170km. Last time I checked that is space, not the atmosphere. Not a lot of weather up there.
And if you think this is just sci-fi, remember, the Navy recently used HAARP to create plasma clouds
Well, it was actually a laser beam and it wouldn't work with radio frequencies.
Scottish and Czech scientist just build a miniature tractor beam
I think it's fascinating but not so scary.
I know, it is scary, but everything will be fine.
The weather control theory of "chemtrails" doesn't really work too well, especially if HAARP has to be used.
edit on 3/3/2013 by Phage because: (no reason given)
Can you prove plasma clouds can be formed in space as you say?
Yes. Yes I did. And you quoted me saying it.
You did say yes to the navy recently used HAARP to create plasma clouds in space did you not?