It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Source
A day after Woodward's claim that a senior White House official had told him he would "regret" writing a column criticizing President Obama's stance on the sequester, Lanny Davis, a longtime close advisor to President Bill Clinton, told WMAL's Mornings on the Mall Thursday he had received similar threats for newspaper columns he had written about Obama in the Washington Times.
Davis told WMAL that his editor, John Solomon, "received a phone call from a senior Obama White House official who didn't like some of my columns, even though I'm a supporter of Obama. I couldn't imagine why this call was made." Davis says the Obama aide told Solomon, "that if he continued to run my columns, he would lose, or his reporters would lose their White House credentials."
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
reply to post by burntheships
The White House does seem to operate as if they exist in a world where action doesn't matter and all can be spun or re-written later anyway. It's baffling because the real world outside Washington simply doesn't work this way. However, so much of what we're seeing happen right now makes no sense if they honestly believe they can or will ever be held to account for it. It's that 'above the law' attitude that gets me more than anything else.
But at the same time, a theme emerged that there was nothing unusual about a White House trying to intimidate reporters. Mark Halperin said "the Bush White House regularly would engage in the same kind of tactics." And Joe Scarborough and Andrea Mitchell shared stories of having been threatened by the Bush and Reagan White Houses, respectively. Andrea named names. Scarborough did not. - See more at: newsbusters.org... Read more: newsbusters.org...
Originally posted by KyrieEleison
reply to post by burntheships
So we're up to 3 now?
I'm starting to wonder if all journalists with access (aside from the boot-licking sycophants) are given this kind of "encouragement".
Originally posted by beezzer
Perhaps I'm wrong (most likely) but my tin-foil-hat-super-powers are telling me that the mask is coming off the "Obama Public Face" and we're getting to see glimpses of his "real" face.