It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The next logical question is what is causing the apparent increase in fireballs seen this month? The key word here is apparent. It could very well be that there is no increase at all, but rather a marked increase in the number of reported fireballs. Mr. Hankey has worked with the AMS in providing an easy way to report fireball sightings and the general public has responded with a record number of reports so far in January. If you look through the last five years that the AMS has available, you will see an increase in every year. The increase is certainly not as dramatic as January 10 vs. January 11, but that again can be attributed to the recent change in format. I am also confident that no matter the number of NEO's in January 2012, there were still be more fireball reports in January 12 vs. January 11. Interesting subject and I appreciate the contributions of Dirk, Mike, Wayne, and Carl!
Bob Lunsford
These are scientific figures.
Originally posted by Urantia1111
reply to post by Phage
It also doesn't mean there aren't more fireballs. Come on Phage. This tired old explanation again? That's total speculation. "Maybe its because the reporting methods have improved"...These are scientific figures. What else do you suggest we go by?
So when DOES observation of the natural world become "science"?
Maybe not all but there hasn't been a 500% increase in fireballs. I haven't seen a fireball lately. If there are 500% more of them I probably should have. Do you really think it's unlikely that there are 5 times as many people who are aware of the website than there were in 2005? You don't think it's likely that 5 times as many people are aware that they can file a report?
Of the 500% increase you're saying ALL 500 can be explained by the newness of a website?
Because there were few reports.
No one has answered yet my question as to why there were no reports of fireballs with concurrent sound in 2005 yet many in 2012,
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by PlanetXisHERE
Because there were few reports.
No one has answered yet my question as to why there were no reports of fireballs with concurrent sound in 2005 yet many in 2012,
Why were there no fireballs at all in 2004?
Or maybe it's because Planet X is here.
edit on 2/28/2013 by Phage because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by mclinking
Thanks.
I was specifically referring to the AMS database though.
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by Urantia1111
These are scientific figures.
No they aren't. They are voluntary reports using a relatively new system. It is not a scientific sample.
Tell me, when did you become aware of the AMS website? When did you become aware that you could report fireball sightings there? Now, if you saw a fireball before you knew about the website, how could you report it? But now you know about it so if you do see a fireball you can report it. See how it works? As more people learn about the website, more people are able to report their sightings. Multiply you by a lot more people and what do you get? More fireball reports but no real reason to think there are more fireballs.
edit on 2/28/2013 by Phage because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by PlanetXisHERE
Originally posted by Urantia1111
reply to post by Phage
It also doesn't mean there aren't more fireballs. Come on Phage. This tired old explanation again? That's total speculation. "Maybe its because the reporting methods have improved"...These are scientific figures. What else do you suggest we go by?
Sure, some people will just blame it on the website.
But anecdotal evidence seems to support the website's evidence.
Fireballs with sonic booms are big news today, they would have been big news 30 or 50 years ago. Newspapers, TV and radio love to get ahold of sensational stories like fireballs with sonic booms, it sells ad space, and whether or not there was youtube or smart phones such events have been reported in the media in the past, though the occurence was rare, not because of fewer people, no internet etc - but because these events used to be extremely rare.
Many of us over the past two years can recall reports on the news of booms in places like California/Nevada, Louisiana, the UK concurrent with sightings of daytime fireballs.
Let's not get off-track with the Orwellian distraction of "are we really experiencing what we are really experiencing", and discuss possible reasons for this hugely significant increase in fireballs, especially those with sound.
No one has answered yet my question as to why there were no reports of fireballs with concurrent sound in 2005 yet many in 2012, I think it might be important the fireballs with concurrent sound are on the increase.
edit on 28-2-2013 by PlanetXisHERE because: spellingedit on 28-2-2013 by PlanetXisHERE because: addition
Originally posted by Phage
I haven't seen a fireball lately. If there are 500% more of them I probably should have.