reply to post by Hopechest
Well I would disagree that its about control at this point in time.
Back up your disagreement with some facts and some references that it is not about "control"
The OP posted three videos supporting and substantiating his position and you reply with your "OPINION"
Thank you for taking the time out of your busy college class schedule to WEIGHT IN on the subject.
Consider that the recent gun ban simply was allowed to expire without hardly a whisper from anyone and how Obama never even mentioned it in his first
four years of office.
Prove by objective measurable (see, hear, touch, smell, taste) data and facts, that "OBAMA NEVER EVEN MENTIONED" it in his first four years of (in
sic) office. Did you record EVERYTHING that OBAMA said during the 1459 days he was in office, did OBAMA personally tell you or send you a memo stating
that he never even mentioned it in his 1459 days?
It doesn't seem to be an issue at the forefront of politicians agendas.
That is until some of the recent shootings happened. Now I see students at my university demanding guns be taking off the street and they are very
Not sure that I believe you that you "SEE students demanding guns be taking (taken sic) off the street and they are very vocal"
Correct me if I am wrong, you HEAR students demanding guns be taking (taken sic) off the street and they are very vocal (vocal meaning that an event
is being produced that stimulates the auditory nerves and not the visual nerves? Right.
If you, who are attending college, cannot differentiate between the different events that stimulate either visual or auditory nerve endings, and
cannot and will not produce one iota of evidence that OBAMA never even mentioned it... then why take the conclusions that you draw SERIOUSLY?
Get enough of these gun grabbers together and they raise a loud enough rhetoric that it demands a response from the politicians in order to appease
I agree with this statement. Get enough whiners and bellyachers together and get them whining and bawling and MAKING NOISE, and someone will try to
shut them up. That is and has become the politically correct way to get what you want for your particular special interest group here in America is
collect enough whiners and get them to whine loud enough and sooner than later the law will change.
I think this is what's happening. Its simply the democrats using a political issue to show they are doing something that the base desires, with
elections coming up in less than 2 years and a possibility of retaking the House they need to make sure they have thier base locked down.
"Its (it's sic) something the base desires..." why would the base desire the dismantling of the 2A?
"They need to make sure they have thier (their sic) base locked down" lots of wisdom in that comment.
This is why your seeing so much legislation at the moment and why you didn't see it a couple of years ago.
Are you sure this is why your (you're) seeing so much legislation at the moment by states to prevent enactment of impending 2A laws? States passing
laws to arrest and jail any federal agents who attempt to enforce unconstitutional laws.
With your you're yore intelligence level, being in collage and such, eye hope yew you ewe go in to either political science (perfect job) or teaching
engleash (english sic)