Chris Matthews to Hillary on 2016 POTUS Run - 'We'll get you in there"

reply to post by usernameconspiracy

It isn't a popular idea among hardcore Republicans, but they need to find a candidate that will pull the swing vote, and that means shutting the hell up regarding social issues.

All the GOP does is cater to the centrists/moderates/left. I agree that Palin was divisive but their loss had more to do with the wimpy John McCain than it did Palin IMO.

I’d prefer a hard core conservative (maybe a libertarian) over any swing-vote grabbing moderate like McCain. I’d rather lose every election and go out on my principles than cave to moderate pressures.

If I wanted another NEOCON I'd vote for Hillary!!

reply to post by seabag

Originally posted by seabag
HEY, HILLARY SUPPORTERS - When the SHTF, don't look my direction!

Don't worry. We won't.

reply to post by FlyersFan

Originally posted by FlyersFan
Fox 'let go' both Palin and Beck.

Well, pick any other two. Bill O'Reilly and Sean Hannity.

If the dems want a power ticket in 2016 ... Bill Richardson/Hillary Clinton.

Sounds good to me.

reply to post by rockymcgilicutty

Originally posted by rockymcgilicutty
Is anyone else worried that the current king won't step down?

I used to think that about Bush Jr. Then I realized how ridiculous the thought was.

Allen west and Dr Conner would work quite well me thinks

reply to post by seabag

If I wanted another NEOCON I'd vote for Hillary!!

If you voted for Hillary you wouldn't be "culturaly insensitive" to the female gender.

I love it when those two phrases are added before WB.

chris matthews is an obvious democrat who did you expect him to endorse? msnbc is like the counter weight to fox news and at this point they are all full of crap!!! i will vote for anyone who will bring the jobs back to the u.s and not sell us out to the corporations. haha good luck with that one

reply to post by rockymcgilicutty

If you voted for Hillary you wouldn't be "culturaly insensitive" to the female gender.

I love it when those to phrases are added before WB.

I didn’t know people threw around phrases like that in UK (Upper Kentucky)!

Ya, well I’ve been called worse. Hillary is bad for the country. If I have to be called “culturally insensitive” for voting against her then that’s a small price to pay. After all, I’m already a “racist” for not voting for Obama twice!

reply to post by beezzer


Ben Ghazi, and all that came afterwards, the fainting is what gets me.
That was the second time, I dont know are presidents known for fainting?



What if she was in The White House as POTUS, and she faints?


I guess Bill could just step in on her behalf, ditch the silk robes and all until
she gained her health back.

Oh, and those glasses!



She will be 69 in 2016, thats quite OLD. Can she pull it off?
She will definitely have to get rid of the current meme of old and fragile.
idk

Originally posted by seabag
reply to post by rockymcgilicutty

 

If you voted for Hillary you wouldn't be "culturaly insensitive" to the female gender.

I love it when those to phrases are added before WB.

I didn’t know people threw around phrases like that in UK (Upper Kentucky)!

Ya, well I’ve been called worse. Hillary is bad for the country. If I have to be called “culturally insensitive” for voting against her then that’s a small price to pay. After all, I’m already a “racist” for not voting for Obama twice!

We are on the same page.

I wanted to beat a member who use's those two lines to often (Neocon & Culturally Insenstive)

Besides, I had to look them both up the first time I heard them. In KY we call them a bully and a redneck.

reply to post by FlyersFan

I can't understand why the democrats put Obama up for POTUS. He was totally unqualified.

Easy answer so they could play the race card

Same way they will put Clinton up to play the sexist card.

Granted the republican field does not look promising in the least their solution and what their opposites is say the right needs to be more like the left- moderates and rinos.

Thats the case what do we need 2 parties for?

Right?

Can't stand Clnton or Msnbc Benghazi alone is why she shouldn't be potus.

Wait...so MSNBC is left leaning and almost just a tool for democrats?
Wow...learn something new everyday. go figure.

But I would put msnbc's "facts" up against fox's "facts" any day of the week in regards to closer to reality...skewed, but closer.
MSNBC buffs, shines, spins, and bends facts to near absurd levels...however, they rarely flat out lie. Fox lies..that is the difference.

But I agree...if you want a generally unskewed view of what is going on...watch or read..erm..the BBC I think (gotta take a look at it from outside the box.)
CNN tries so hard to not offend anyone that they simply have stopped journalism all together for fear of the fringe on either side labeling them. Vanilla pudding.

Originally posted by SaturnFX
MSNBC buffs, shines, spins, and bends facts to near absurd levels...however, they rarely flat out lie.

They lie. I posted a few .. but google is FULL of MSNBC or NBC lies information. They lie and lie and lie and push their far left agenda. How anyone can say that FOX = BAD but MSNBC is okay because they supposedly aren't as bad .. well .. all I can say to that is ...

Originally posted by NightGypsy
Oh, God......Can we please....PLEASE not start this election stuff so early?

You'll have to take that up with Chris 'tingle up my leg for Obama' Matthews.
I'm wondering .. if Obama gave Matthews a tingle up his leg ...
I wonder what body part Hillary will give him a tingle in.

Did I just say that? Yes I did!

i believe Obama would be our last president

Originally posted by sam_inc
i believe Obama would be our last president

And this would be because? One line statements like that without any explanation can leave a lot to the imagination... I mean it could mean that Robert Reich was right and we have to move back in with England...

Originally posted by burntheships
She will be 69 in 2016, thats quite OLD. Can she pull it off?

Reagan was 69 when he took office. It's unusual but not unprecedented. Plus I think she has some Keith Richards way of rejuvenating.

reply to post by intrepid


This is true, although Reagan I think was in much better health, and active.
( well at least he rode horses and did not faint)

Even with all of the Jelly Bellys he ate, it was rumored that Alzheimers was setting
in while he was in office.

Speaking of Keith Richards...

These glasses might suit Hillary better, at least its not the Old meme...
Catwoman?


photo credit

reply to post by intrepid


Keith Richards is preserved by years of drugs,rock and booze,Hillary is propelled by ego driven dementia.
She is shriveling up as we watch from the pressure of such a deceptive life.

Hillary is the next logical choice to continue installation of a society dependent on government...shes deep in the UN and would love to further and continue the globalist UN trend as much as she possibly can.

She will also be another "first" in terms of presidential precedence and this will be the next "race" card played in response to criticism of her. When people didn't agree with Obama it was because he was black and when people don't agree with Hillary it will be because she is a woman ...I'm sure there is a gay president lined up after her and if anyone disagrees or criticizes him it will be because hes gay ...

meanwhile all the associated "marginalized" groups will value and relate to the messenger and not the message. This will be the rule...and of course there are exceptions to it but none the less the majority will probably receive the messenger and ignore the message.

In terms of globalism...shes a wet-dream candidate that I'm sure will only trend more and more in the next 4+ years as propaganda increases...

pretty soon after years of passive association, liberty and terrorism will mean the exact same thing. Anyone who values independence and individualism will be suspect and questioned as their motives aren't in-line with the "main-stream" which perceives those beliefs as a POTENTIAL threat.

This future will endorse "pre-crime" laws, globalism, surveillance, safety and security above ALL else...they will be the #1 priorities in power and all else will be the sacrificial lamb to bring these priorities about.

This is the future turned on its head...

due-process and justice will be sacrificed for pre-crime laws...individualism will be sacrificed for globalism, independence sacrificed for socialism, liberty will be sacrificed for safety and security, and privacy will be sacrificed for surveillance...

Welcome...to the New World Order

reply to post by FlyersFan


No they don't fit my Left wing agenda, they are Liberal and favor Democrats... neither of which are Left. I don't watch MSNBC, I try to watch/read as much Independent media as possible, can you say the same? I doubt it. You scream FOX news pretty consistently.