It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Cynic
1) Parenting class prior to birth with test on completion, if failed, take the baby at birth and send out for adoption, no parental contact.
2) Means test, can he/she/they afford the child, if no, take the baby at birth and send out for adoption, no parental contact.
3) I.Q. test, iif lower than normal society, take the baby at birth and send out for adoption, no parental contact.
If this sounds too harsh, tough. I am tired of my rights as a taxpayer being trod upon at the whim of idiots.
Originally posted by TokiTheDestroyer
I swear to god I read these threads and you people seem like you want Nineteen Eighty-Four to come to fruition.
We just need all these new rules and regulations because we don't have enough already, right?
Gotta step on more toes, piss off more people, make more hard feelings all around, yeah, great idea.
I.Q. test have been proven to be nothing of the sort to indicate intelligence or capability.
they are creating a person that will be part of society.
Originally posted by Ghost375
The answer is no.
But isn't it funny how there's no right of this in the bill of rights, and no one has tried to pass a bill like this yet?
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.